Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Quality problem reencoding

2002-11-14 Thread B. Streamin
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Haas Wernfried wrote: maybe you could switch to ogg vorbis, it is designed to be able to peel a stream, which means reducing bitrate without reencoding, but afaik the tools for peeling are quite experimental / not available for the public yet. if you already have mp3s and

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Quality problem reencoding

2002-11-14 Thread Gabriel Bouvigne
I have a number of files created with lame 3.92 using the --r3mix preset. They all sound great. The problem is when I reencode them down for streaming. It doesn't matter if I reencode on the fly or reencode first. The effect reminds me of a phase shifter commonly used on a

[MP3 ENCODER] Any advices?

2002-11-14 Thread Lim Kim Teck
Hi, I'm really new to MP3. I'm trying to watermark wavefiles and encode to MP3 files, but I seem to have no progress after few months. Can anyone advise me on what literature should I read up? Do I need a clear understanding of psychoacoustic model, huffman constants etc? Please help. Thanks.

[MP3 ENCODER] Re: Quality problem reencoding

2002-11-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 14), Greg Wooledge said: Dan Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Unfortunately, ogg is no good for streaming, as its minimum bitrate is 64k. That's completely untrue. I've heard of people producing Vorbis bitstreams as low as 5 kbps (of course, this is a degenerate