Jon Skeet wrote:
Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all?
What does it mean to convert to .NET?
It means to rewrite it in code which can be compiled to the Microsoft .NET framework
(or the other ECMA-compliant CLRs, such as Mono).
Jon
Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all? I was wondering whether it might not
be an interesting project, partly for performance comparison purposes and partly to
provide a nice easy way for .NET developers to encode sound.
I'd be interested in putting a lot of the effort in if others
Jon Skeet wrote:
Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all? I was wondering whether it might not be an interesting project,
partly for performance comparison purposes
I'm sorry but you will not gain any performance enhancements by
converting Lame to CLR byte code.
If you just mean
Jon Skeet wrote:
Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all? I was
wondering whether it might not be an interesting project,
partly for performance comparison purposes
I'm sorry but you will not gain any performance enhancements by
converting Lame to CLR byte code.
No, I wasn't
Jon Skeet wrote:
Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all?
What does it mean to convert to .NET?
Bob
--
Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler.
A. Einstein
___
