I have a stereo 16 bit wav file sampled at 48000Hz
I use two methods to encode
1. CBR, 128Kbps
2. VBR, 128Kbps, Joint Stereo
When comparing the file size, I have 2 questions
1. Why the file size of VBR is bigger than CBR?
2. Why VBR produce more samples in the output (viewing the properties
On 3/19/07, howard chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stereo 16 bit wav file sampled at 48000Hz
I use two methods to encode
1. CBR, 128Kbps
2. VBR, 128Kbps, Joint Stereo
What are your lame encoding parameters (switches) for (1) and (2)?
2. Why VBR produce more samples in the output
YUE LI a écrit :
As I know, both psychoacoustic model and quantization use scalefactor bands,
not equally divided subbands.
So why Polyphase subband filtering is performed in the beginning of encoding?
It's just to keep a decoding step identical between layer II and layer
III. From an
and all the following modules use
scalefactor subband only.
So I wonder why we divide the signal equally at the begginning, just to
convenient MDCT?
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Kun Niu[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Apr 11, 2006 23:50
Title : Re: [mp3encoder] Question about Subband
)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:51:46 + (GMT)
From: YUE LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [mp3encoder] Question about Subband filtering
To: mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Hi,
I have a very simple question. But I
)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:51:46 + (GMT)
From: YUE LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [mp3encoder] Question about Subband filtering
To: mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Hi,
I have a very simple
Hi,
I have a very simple question. But I just couldn't make it out.
As I know, both psychoacoustic model and quantization use scalefactor bands,
not equally divided subbands.
So why Polyphase subband filtering is performed in the beginning of encoding?
Looking forward to your help...
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Warren Toomey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MP3 encoders development list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Question
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 01:43:05PM -0500, Dan F Merrill wrote:
Please don't send any more of your
Please don't send any more of your email to me.
Thank you. -Dan Merrill of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Please don't send any more of your email to me.
Thank you. -Dan Merrill of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Please don't send any more of your email to me.
Thank you. -Dan Merrill of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Christopher Gorrie wrote:
I have dynamically linked the LAME Dll
to my program and was wondering whether
there is any way to write tags (ID3V1
or ID3V2) to the MP3's.
Is it just not part of the library yet?
Well, it is part of libmp3lame, but not exposed by the dll.
You will probably have to
Hi
If you are using Delphi check the site
http://www.dv.co.yu/mpgscript/mpeghdr.htm.
Lars
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Bouvigne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MP3 encoders development list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder
What does it mean when Internal buffer inconsistency. flushbits
ResvSize is printed to stderr when calling lame_encode_buffer()?
Thanks In Advance
Deven
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
14 matches
Mail list logo
