Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-29 Thread Bill Hart
I just discovered why this happened for Sage. It turns out that there are two ways to build mpfr. One is --with-gmp and the other is --with-gmp-build. The latter speeds up mpfr by making use of internal GMP symbols, assuming you have access to a source build of GMP. If you build mpfr with the

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-17 Thread Bill Hart
Hi Jason, you may also want to forward to sage-devel where this was originally discussed. Bill. On Saturday, 17 March 2012, Jason ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: Hi GAP-4.5 compiles and runs OK for me with MPIR-2.5.1 , I would need some more details to track this down Thanks Jason

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-16 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-15 23:13, Jason wrote: pari-2.3.5.tar.gz This is very outdated. There is a stable version 2.5.1 now: http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/download.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups mpir-devel group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-16 Thread leif
Jason wrote: I added app tests for mpfr-3.1.0 mpfi-1.5.1 ecm-6.4.1 flint-2.3 pari-2.5.1 [Apparently Jeroen missed this.] and the first missing functions are ../../../mpfr-3.1.0/src/mulders.c: In function 'mpfr_divhigh_n_basecase': ../../../mpfr-3.1.0/src/mulders.c:208:3: error:

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-16 Thread Jason
On 16 March 2012 09:18, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: Jason wrote: I added app tests for mpfr-3.1.0 mpfi-1.5.1 ecm-6.4.1 flint-2.3 pari-2.5.1 [Apparently Jeroen missed this.] and the first missing functions are ../../../mpfr-3.1.0/src/mulders.c: In function

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-16 Thread Bill Hart
It might be worth adding a comment at that point of the header to say that these definitions are only needed for compatibility with undocumented GMP interfaces and that they shouldn't be used in MPIR itself. Otherwise we might find they become a feature we have to support in future. Bill. On 16

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-16 Thread leif
Bill Hart wrote: On 16 March 2012 09:18, leifnot.rea...@online.de wrote: Jason wrote: and the first missing functions are ../../../mpfr-3.1.0/src/mulders.c: In function 'mpfr_divhigh_n_basecase': ../../../mpfr-3.1.0/src/mulders.c:208:3: error: 'gmp_pi1_t' undeclared (first use in this

Re: [mpir-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading the optional GMP spkg

2012-03-14 Thread Bill Hart
Probably GAP uses some of the GMP internals. As far as I know, we don't test MPIR against GAP. It sounds like we should. Bill. On 14 March 2012 02:55, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi MPIR devs Do any of you know what Dima is alluding to below? -- Forwarded message