List Manager wrote:
I just had a meeting with Dan Niziolek, and it sounds like a bit mistake is
about to made on Lake Street. They are trying to push through a vote
(planned for next Friday, July 23rd) to make the street five lanes for many
blocks around Chicago Avenue.
I disagree with the whole
Jay Walljasper wrote:
Call Dan's office and speak to Gay Noble, 612.673.2210 or e-mail above.
I think the meeting is now for the 20th
Thanks for your help, Jay
I already sent a message to Dan but I wanted to follow up with some
more observations:
26th and 28th streets are very underutilized.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 15, 2004
Media Contact: Cheri Reese, Executive Director of Public Affairs,
612-668-0230
Planning team to assist Minneapolis Public Schools with Future
Facilities Use
Efforts coordinated with community engagement
Minneapolis, Minn.--The
List Manager wrote:
Forwarded with permission of the author:
I just had a meeting with Dan Niziolek, and it sounds like a bit mistake is
about to made on Lake Street. ... This project will affect Lake Street for 50 years,
and deserves further
discussion about what is best for everyone, not just
Pulse of the Twin Cities
Volume 8, Issue 15
July 14 - July 20, 2004
http://pulsetc.com
Your Locally Grown Alternative Newspaper
--
A Conversation with Hizzoner the Mayor
Rybak discusses new police chief, upcoming campaign
by Ed Felien
Hizzonner, the
David Greene wrote:
26th and 28th streets are very underutilized. When I don't drive
on Lake Street, I take these streets. There is almost no traffic
on them, even during rush hour.
Why widen when additional express and local transit service will
take cars off the road _and_ reduce parking
Subject: [Mpls] Protest Cheney in Mpls 7.17 8/9:30/10am
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:18:01 -0500
Subject: Cheney in Minneapolis Sat 17th
Lets give a furious Minnesota welcome to - snip - DICK CHENEY.
- snip -
It is not Patriotic to let such people enter Minnesota as though they
were not
I just got a call from Mary Watson, Chair of Ventura
Village Court Watch program. Mary just returned from
court and called to tell me that the offender they
were following was sentenced to 19 months in prison
after he plead guilty to the charges against him. I
won't name him because his name
I am a supporter of LRT and am excited by it's initial success. I can't say
the same for a friend of mine who is transit dependent. He is nearly blind
and depends solely on the bus to get to and from work and other places. He
does not live close enough to an LRT station to use it.
According to
I've used both 28th and 28th streets (26th more often) instead of dealing
with Lake, and they can be a real timesaver. I recently used 28th to travel
from Lyndale to Hiawatha and didn't have to stop once, since all the traffic
lights seemed to be better synchronized than on Lake. Probably one of
Nathan Hunstad wrote:
I've used both 28th and 28th streets (26th more often) instead of dealing
with Lake, and they can be a real timesaver. I recently used 28th to travel
from Lyndale to Hiawatha and didn't have to stop once, since all the traffic
lights seemed to be better synchronized than on
How about eliminating all left turns during rush hour, not just at
intersections?
Why does Lake street now have to be either 3 lanes or 5? Why not just call
the whole thing off and leave it at 4? Or, use the 10s of millions in
reconstruction money to bring back the streetcars?
Mike Jensvold
Nathan Hunstad wrote, in part:
I think traffic could be much improved if they were.
I think that a three-lane Lake Street with continuous left-turn lanes,
combined with better-timed signals, is more than adequate. Perhaps the city
could use signs to direct through traffic to 26th and 28th
As a St. Paul homeboy, I never use Lake unless I'm going to some place along
Lake. More often than not, my business is at the west edge (Uptown, Calhoun,
Kenwood), and the only way to fly is down the east-west one-ways 26th/28th
Sts. Once in a great while, I like to just drive Lake St. to see
On 7/14/04 10:22 AM, Ron Lischeid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference here is that the noise insulation program is not funded by
tax money- it is paid for by Passenger Facility Charges (PFC) which is a
surcharge attached to tickets of passengers using MSP- those that use the
airport and
15 matches
Mail list logo