Mpls-Issues tip: PLEASE trim the previous message when responding. The redundant
characters make tough reading for Digest subscribers and needlessly lengthens download
times.
---
Someone had posted earlier that in St. Paul the endorsement of the Stonewall
caucus in did not depend on
Mpls-Issues tip: PLEASE trim the previous message when responding. The redundant
characters make tough reading for Digest subscribers and needlessly lengthens download
times.
---
In Stonewall caucus screenings, acceptable ratings endorsement
are decided by a secret ballot of
Mpls-Issues tip: please delete as much of this message's text as possible if replying
to the list. Thanks!
---
As a candidate for City Council in the 8th Ward, I sought the Stonewall DFL
endorsement this year and was rated not acceptable. After my screening
interview three of the
Mpls-Issues tip: please delete as much of this message's text as possible if replying
to the list. Thanks!
---
Someone had posted earlier that in St. Paul the endorsement of the Stonewall
caucus in did not depend on holding to the DFL endorsement process but in
MPLS it is a criteria
Mpls-Issues tip: PLEASE trim/cut the previous message that you are responding to. The
redundant characters make it harder for Digest readers to read and it needlessly
lengthens download times.
---
There's nothing like a little humor to make a point. Borrowing from
the theme of Animal
