what gives? i thought i could look forward to comments
about the city council president's candidacy for a
fourth term. shocked, i'm shocked!
my favorite part of the strib's story was the line " a
big part of her personal decision was the North Side
housing development and her work on afffordable
The Star Tribune article that I read about council member Cherryhomes'
reelction announcement mentioned her sheparding through the council the
major development projects, specifically mentioning Target [ $66 Million
taxpayer subsidy for an already extremely profitable for-profit
corporation to
Actually, if you check the history of Minneapolis, very early in its
existence, after Eastman tried to tunnel under the river for more reparian
rights, and St. Anthony Falls began to cave in, the business wigs in
Minneapolis (Pillsbury, Eastman, Upton, Steele, etc.) got the feds to pay
for
Don't know if the list played a role in this getting to the Major Daily, but
here's the Strib's take on the Bassett Creek water dispute. Unanswered
question: Will the Minneapolis Council go on record about the arrangement?
Kudos to Jenny Heiser and Dave Stack for bringing this to everyone's
In a message dated 12/8/2000 11:54:48 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes in part, on mpls-issues:
...here's the Strib's take on the Bassett Creek water dispute. Unanswered
question: Will the Minneapolis Council go on record about the arrangement?
..
the way that i read the article was that GM was
basically bribing Golden Valley to go along with the
project and fight for it.
the idea about the city council of minneapolis coming
clean about this confuses me.
I know the city of mpls. sells water to golden valley.
i have heard that they pay a
