Michael Atherton wrote
I see, so since my father died of a heart attack, I have
have the right to ban all fried foods eaten in public
places? Not to mention most meat products.
Point: People have a choice to smoke or not smoke and
a choice of being exposed to secondhand smoke (except
for
So, would you prefer to have your friend or family member die of cancer,
or have your local pub die because it relied on allowing cancer-causing
drugs?
Bars and restaurants have generally short lifespans, and often die
quickly. My friends should not.
Some bars and restaurants will go out
Bob Spaulding wrote:
So, would you prefer to have your friend or family member die
of cancer, or have your local pub die because it relied on allowing
cancer-causing drugs?
If you are so concerned about your friend or family member
why don't you have them kidnapped and deprogrammed?
Why
Michael Atherton asked:
Why force everyone else to met your needs?
Right back at you, Michael.
Why should many among us put up with the gut-level emotional disgust of
losing friends and neighbors to cancer without helping head off the
larger pressures?
Why should employers put up with
Bob Spaulding wrote:
Why should many among us put up with the gut-level emotional disgust
of losing friends and neighbors to cancer without helping head off the
larger pressures?
Your gut level reaction to friends dying of cancer is disgust? Not pain
cause they died? What if a friend dies
Bob Spaulding responded:
Michael Atherton asked:
Why force everyone else to met your needs?
Right back at you, Michael.
Sorry, but it's the ban augments that have the contradictions.
Why should many among us put up with the gut-level emotional
disgust of losing friends and
://www.smokeoutgary.org
- Original Message -
From: Sean Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mpls@mnforum.org
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Mpls] On the smoking ban from a bar-owner
Perhaps Ms. Jeffers problem is that she owns a dirty rundown bar in an
area
teeming with well-run