From: mse00...@gmail.com
To: mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:56:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] First comparison MSElang - FPC ;-)
On Saturday 31 January 2015 15:14:50 Fred van Stappen wrote:
Hello.
Is it possible to compile MSEide
On Friday 30 January 2015 19:25:09 misu kun wrote:
if you add inline to test function , fpc 3.1.1 will produce ~ the same
assember
The difference is that LLVM knows that the procedure has no sideffects and
that it is called with constant arguments - it produces a constant result
and can be
How is this related to the future
=
The promise also offers combination of async=parallel ( all() )
sync=waited (then()) execution, for instance :
Promise.all([async_func1(),..async_funcN(),..]).then(sync_func1()).then(sync_func2))...
async_funcX() run in parallel (on different cores
On 01/25/2015 07:32 PM, Ivanko B wrote:
How about the Promise conseption for task parallelizing/waiting as a
benifitiar of multiple cores?
How is this related to the future notation used in Delphi Prism (aka
Oxygen )?
-Michael
Preventing from tossing registers stack we see in the example
minimizes function call overhead :)
and llvm beat gcc too i guess
==
Until gcc 2014+, for some scenarios, for sure
What I saw up to now from LLVM backend is really impressive
==
And the one is constantly being
Totally agree with you. :)
I think that using LLVM is a right choice.
2015-01-23 18:30 GMT+01:00 Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com:
On Friday 23 January 2015 17:20:55 Julio Jiménez wrote:
BTW, GCC 4.9 vs LLVM CLang 3.5 at Phoronix
What I saw up to now from LLVM backend is really
On Friday 23 January 2015 17:20:55 Julio Jiménez wrote:
BTW, GCC 4.9 vs LLVM CLang 3.5 at Phoronix
What I saw up to now from LLVM backend is really impressive. I also like the
concept with the LLVM bitcode input because it enables to use multiple cores
for the MSElang frontend and the unit
BTW, GCC 4.9 vs LLVM CLang 3.5 at Phoronix
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=gcc49_compiler_llvm35
2015-01-23 14:09 GMT+01:00 Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Here the first comparison of FPC and MSElang produced code:
Source:
program test1;
function test(p1:
Comparison? ;)
Well, bit by bit... :)
2015-01-23 14:09 GMT+01:00 Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Here the first comparison of FPC and MSElang produced code:
Source:
program test1;
function test(p1: int32): int32;
var
i1: int32;
begin
i1:= p1;
result:= p1+i1;
end;
Hi,
Here the first comparison of FPC and MSElang produced code:
Source:
program test1;
function test(p1: int32): int32;
var
i1: int32;
begin
i1:= p1;
result:= p1+i1;
end;
begin
exitcode:= test(123);
end.
MSElang with LLVM backend with -O3:
.file test-opt.ll
.text
LLVM calculate the result at compile time ,
but, for sure llvm is more powerful than fpc ;) , and llvm beat gcc too i guess
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a
11 matches
Mail list logo
