Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

On Sunday 26 June 2016 18:33:17 che fou wrote: > MSElang seems better than Clang . how ? , they both uses llvm 3.8.1 > Yes, MSElang produces per happenstance more optimal initial BC-code for the testcase it seems. Changing the pascalcode to " program test; procedure p(); var n1, n2, n3, n4,

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

MSElang seems better than Clang . how ? , they both uses llvm 3.8.1 -- Attend Shape: An AT Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

On Tuesday 16 February 2016 16:10:27 Julio Jiménez wrote: > The link: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org/msg41615.html > > 2016-02-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Fred van Stappen : > > Very impressive the result of MSElang. > > With LLVM 3.8.1 it is even

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

> AFAIK "real" FPC programs also are not the > fastest and smallest. ;-) And for libraries it is even worse... ;-( -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

On Tuesday 16 February 2016 16:06:41 Fred van Stappen wrote: > Very impressive the result of MSElang. > It's LLVM's merit. > I am ready to try/use it ;-) > Not ready yet. There is a long way to go. Interesting the answer of the FPC team on any benchmark that it is not significant for "real"

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

The link: https://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org/msg41615.html 2016-02-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Fred van Stappen : > Very impressive the result of MSElang. > > I am ready to try/use it ;-) > > Well done Martin. > > Fre;D > > >

[MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Happy tickets benchmark

Very impressive the result of MSElang. I am ready to try/use it ;-) Well done Martin. Fre;D -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM +