Re: [Mspgcc-users] LPM3 seems to interfere with MSP's ability to restart

2013-11-26 Thread Valentin Sawadski
And is there anything in the errata sheet? I remember once coming across an errata where the device would not wake up from LPM if the interrupt is triggered a few clock cycles after the LPM instruction. On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Andrew McLaren and...@aratika.co.nzwrote: I'll plug

Re: [Mspgcc-users] LPM3 seems to interfere with MSP's ability to restart

2013-11-25 Thread Andrew McLaren
I'll plug Valentin's response in below, as it's got tied to my erroneous post (I always thought this was keyed on the message title, but seems to be more than that?). In the test code I was running, I was literally doing nothing more than the bare minimum I needed to do to get the MSP running

Re: [Mspgcc-users] LPM3 seems to interfere with MSP's ability to restart

2013-11-23 Thread Valentin Sawadski
Hi I'm not sure if it is directy related to your issue but one thing I noticed when debugging targets with MSPGCC is the following. My program is using Timer A and directly after programming the MSP with mspdebug the Timer A is not starting up. It is simply not counting. I have to powercycle the

[Mspgcc-users] LPM3 seems to interfere with MSP's ability to restart

2013-11-20 Thread Andrew McLaren
I'm seeing a bit of a weird situation that I don't really understand. I suspect it will be something simple (hopefully just a 'dumb user error'!). It affects the ability of the debugger to reload/restart code following an LPM3 state. I've been able to reduce the logic to simply the command that

[Mspgcc-users] LPM3 seems to interfere with MSP's ability to restart

2013-11-20 Thread Andrew McLaren
Seemed to have managed to post this as a reply to another thread... Should be here on its own! I'm seeing a bit of a weird situation that I don't really understand. I suspect it will be something simple (hopefully just a 'dumb user error'!). It affects the ability of the debugger to