Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-24 Thread Frédéric Sureau
I've already tried the nop thing and it doesn't work better. I've quickly examined the generated assembly code, and there is no obvious difference between the 2 programs, at least in the main part. I'll try to watch deeper in the next few days. Thanks for your answer again. Fred 2010/8/23

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-24 Thread JMGross
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht - Von: Frédéric Sureau Gesendet am: 23 Aug 2010 21:39:51 I compile my blink led program code (attached) for the msp430f5529 using mspgcc4 with option mmcu=msp430x5418. The result is that the led is blinking too fast. I thought it was that the delay was too

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-23 Thread Frédéric Sureau
: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529 To: GCC for MSP430 - http://mspgcc.sf.net; mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net I believe some people are having some success using mspgcc4 and compiling with the TI headers version of msp430-libc.  There's a bug in the headers right now

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-23 Thread Sergey A. Borshch
On 23.08.2010 22:39, Frédéric Sureau wrote: When removing the main loop ( while(1) ), the led is just flashing one time very shortly independently from the delay duration. Show the code, please. Seems like you missed volatile keyword in delay cycle variable declaration and more effective

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-23 Thread Frédéric Sureau
Thanks for your quick reply ! Nothing changed with the volatile keyword. Here is the code (sorry it was an attachment but it may not have passed) : #include msp430f5529.h int main ( void ) { volatile unsigned long int i; WDTCTL = WDTPW | WDTHOLD; P1DIR = 1;

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Spanton
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:11 -0400, Frédéric Sureau wrote: for(i=0;i5000;i++); Try: for(i=0;i5000;i++) nop(); Cheers, Rob

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-21 Thread Peter Bigot
not tried on target yet). Fred Le 19 août 2010 15:35, Frédéric Sureau frederic.sur...@gmail.com a écrit : -- Forwarded message -- From: Peter Bigot p...@peoplepowerco.com Date: 2010/8/11 Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529 To: GCC for MSP430

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-21 Thread Frédéric Sureau
-- From: Peter Bigot p...@peoplepowerco.com Date: 2010/8/11 Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529 To: GCC for MSP430 - http://mspgcc.sf.net; mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net I believe some people are having some success using mspgcc4 and compiling with the TI headers

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-20 Thread Frédéric Sureau
Le 19 août 2010 15:35, Frédéric Sureau frederic.sur...@gmail.com a écrit : -- Forwarded message -- From: Peter Bigot p...@peoplepowerco.com Date: 2010/8/11 Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529 To: GCC for MSP430 - http://mspgcc.sf.net; mspgcc-users

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc or mspgcc4 for a msp430f5529

2010-08-11 Thread Peter Bigot
I believe some people are having some success using mspgcc4 and compiling with the TI headers version of msp430-libc. There's a bug in the headers right now that means you should include the legacy header msp430x552x.h instead of the chip-specific one, and the compiler isn't aware of the 5529 so