Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread David Brown
On 12/09/13 20:48, DJ Delorie wrote: Just FYI, the port is now official as it's been approved and checked in to the FSF repository! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-09/msg00107.html I have some follow-up patches that will get commited shortly too, though. Great news! Do you know of any

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread David Brown
On 12/09/13 21:27, DJ Delorie wrote: Is c++ an officially supported aspect of the port? I'm going to conditionally say yes because, while I build and test C++, I know there are some language features of C I took advantage of to get far (20-bit) addressing, that C++ simply doesn't support. So

[Mspgcc-users] Auto-Re: Mspgcc-users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 4

2013-09-13 Thread 徐维亚
你的邮件已接受,谢谢!! -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread scalpel4k
On Friday 13 Sep 2013 09:01:27 David Brown wrote: On 12/09/13 21:27, DJ Delorie wrote: Is c++ an officially supported aspect of the port? I'm going to conditionally say yes because, while I build and test C++, I know there are some language features of C I took advantage of to get far

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 12:27 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 09/13/2013 11:37 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: If we've got to that point then I may be able to assist in making that happen, but there were some concerns that those using the old packages may not be ready to move to the new

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 09/13/2013 11:37 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: If we've got to that point then I may be able to assist in making that happen, but there were some concerns that those using the old packages may not be ready to move to the new ones right away - so it would be nice to hear some thoughts on

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread DJ Delorie
For small targets like this, it is common to compile C++ with -fno-rtti True, but even the static objects must be initialized code adds some runtime space/time cost. It's not much, but the smallest MSP430's don't have much rom/ram to spare.

[Mspgcc-users] Auto-Re: Mspgcc-users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 5

2013-09-13 Thread 徐维亚
你的邮件已接受,谢谢!! -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread Carl Michal
This may be a little off this particular topic, but I was wondering if, along with the new toolchain support, there might be some work done to improve the experience of the MSP430 Launchpad in linux? The CDC-ACM driver has some unpleasant issues with the Launchpad (see, eg:

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-13 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 09/13/2013 12:12 AM, David Brown wrote: Do you know of any timeplans for when it will be possible to get official toolchain snapshot packages with gcc, binutils and a library as prebuilt packages and source bundles? As a developer, I can play around with a self-built gcc, but for