Re: [Mspgcc-users] support for msp430F5437

2010-03-09 Thread Peter Bigot
There was some discussion about whether to include msp430/common.h; the pros are that the documentation says it should be included and people seem to expect it; the cons are that it defines certain things that aren't necessarily common, like the address of the watchdog timer (fixed) and the LPM

Re: [Mspgcc-users] support for msp430F5437

2010-03-09 Thread Anthony Asterisk
The parts of common.h I am presently interested in are the LPM definitions which only exist in common.h. The existing LPM bit definitions are the same for 54xx family. The WDT bits are excluded based on __MSP430_WDT_A_BASE__, which is defined for cc430_.h and msp430x54xx.h, so it looks to

Re: [Mspgcc-users] support for msp430F5437

2010-03-09 Thread JMGross
I don't know which version of the 54xx header file you have. For the 430X compiler or the older non-X-compiler? For the latter, most files have been added/updated since alst release and you can load them from the sourceforge repository. I don't know the state of the headers for the