Not necessarily IN it, only related to it. :)
The question is, why got only this function compiled with reference/usage of
the hwmul functions and all other didn't.
Or do you just use only this one function that does multiplication?
Is the complete stdlib compiled wrong and uses hwmul while it
Well, it's in stdlib as opposed to being in binutils or gcc. And has
nothing to do with hardware multiply being used in the demonstration
program. A one-line program calling printf with a format parameter shows
the problem.
Which is that when msp430-libc builds the multi-lib variants, it
New mspgcc4 release numbered 20101006 posted on
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mspgcc4/. See specific changes at
http://mspgcc4.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb-index.cgi.
Let me know if something that used to work doesn't anymore.
msp430-libc legacy headers:
- 6bccacf SF 3082318: c++ dislikes
