[Mspgcc-users] gdb 5.1.1: gdb-internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized

2006-02-14 Thread Grant Edwards
An internal GDB error was detected. This may make further debugging unreliable. Continue this debugging session? (y or n) If I answer y and continue, monitor commands seem to work, but nothing involving program symbols will work. Any idea what's wrong? -- Grant Edwards

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Recommended gdb version?

2006-02-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-02-14, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: On 2006-02-14, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: I notice that CVS contains gdb code for 5.1.1, 5.4 and current. Does current mean 6.4? Apparently not. 6.4 won't build with the current sources. Both the sim and gdb builds fail

[Mspgcc-users] Re: gdb 5.1.1: gdb-internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized

2006-02-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-02-14, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: Even though gdb 5.1.1 seems to have built OK, it doesn't seem to work. Everytime I start msp430-gdb, I get this error: This GDB was configured as --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=msp430...msp430/toolchain/src/gdb-5.1.1/gdb/partial-stab.h

[Mspgcc-users] Large interrupt overhead?

2006-03-15 Thread Grant Edwards
} -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! ALFRED JARRY! Say at something about th' DEATH visi.comof DISCO!!

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Large interrupt overhead?

2006-03-15 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-03-15, Chris Liechti cliec...@gmx.net wrote: Grant Edwards schrieb: I've been looking at the code generated by avr-gcc 3.4.5, and it sure looks like there's a lot of extra overhead involved in ISRs. Let's write an ISR that just toggles a port pin every time the interrupt happens

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Large interrupt overhead?

2006-03-16 Thread Grant Edwards
the toggle code particularly cumbersome. I did notice that a set/clr is a lot cleaner. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I just remembered at something about a TOAD! visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Large interrupt overhead

2006-03-16 Thread Grant Edwards
involved with a volume design, and the benefits of a C-friendly architecture have a clear and significant value. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I have many CHARTS at and DIAGRAMS... visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Large interrupt overhead?

2006-03-17 Thread Grant Edwards
for trivially small ISRs. But, in may experience, some of them usually are -- and they're the ones that have to run the fastest. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! .. over in west at Philadelphia a puppy

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-03-17, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to exit from low power mode. According to the manual, the _BIC_SR_IRQ() macro does what I want, but I can't get it to compile without a warning. Isn't there a way to do it that doesn't generate compiler warnings

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-17 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-03-18, Brian C. Lane b...@brianlane.com wrote: Grant Edwards wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to exit from low power mode. According to the manual, the _BIC_SR_IRQ() macro does what I want, but I can't get it to compile without a warning. Isn't there a way to do it that doesn't

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-18 Thread Grant Edwards
project I work on had to be tweaked because of that. as you noticed, i'll get better with gcc 4.x as the string concatenation won't work anymore and a bultin function is being added. :-) -- gra...@visi.com Grant Edwards

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-18 Thread Grant Edwards
? -- gra...@visi.com Grant Edwards

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-19 Thread Grant Edwards
building gcc cross-compilers for many years, so maybe I've forotten how baffling the process can be the first time. -- Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-19 Thread Grant Edwards
bothered to update them. Then I'm definitely sticking with 3.2.3. Thanks for the advice. -- Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-19 Thread Grant Edwards
is using the exact same tarballs+patches each time I run it. Besides, I already had a toolchain build script that I'd been using for some other targets, and modifying it to build for the MSP430 target was pretty trivial. -- Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-19 Thread Grant Edwards
. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm an East Side at TYPE... visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: interrupt handler redefinition at runtime

2006-03-20 Thread Grant Edwards
{ if (flag) func1(); else func2(); } I would prefer the first solution because I have some performance issues with the second one. It depends on when and how often you need to change ISRs. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! MERYL STREEP

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-20 Thread Grant Edwards
switch disables that warning? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! It's a lot of fun at being alive... I wonder if visi.commy bed is made?!?

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-20 Thread Grant Edwards
to be done the right way took less time than explaining this. That's why there are compiler switches that allow certain warnings to be ignored. Which compiler switch disables that warning? I notice you haven't answered that question yet. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow

[Mspgcc-users] Re: How to exit from low power mode?

2006-03-20 Thread Grant Edwards
allowed a make to complete if there are any warnings -- I'd never remember to look for that fourth warning. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! I just went at below the poverty line! visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Bugs in BIS_SR et al

2006-03-22 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-03-22, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: It would be good to add a note to the manual section for _BIS_SR_IRQ() and _BIC_SR_IRQ() explaining that they _must_ be called from the top-level of an ISR. They must be called directly by the function which was declared as an interrupt

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Bugs in BIS_SR et al

2006-03-22 Thread Grant Edwards
been parsed yet. In the 4.0 implimentation a compiler builtin is being used instead of a macro, so it might be possible in that case. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! Am I JOGGING at yet

[Mspgcc-users] Re: MSP430FG461X

2006-03-24 Thread Grant Edwards
engineer :-P And we're just lowly customers. :( -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! My mind is a potato at field... visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: UART with MSP430F169

2006-05-02 Thread Grant Edwards
, but under nominal conditions it certainly works. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I've been WRITING at to SOPHIA LOREN every 45 visi.comMINUTES since JANUARY 1ST!!

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Problem with executable

2006-05-17 Thread Grant Edwards
this? $ objdump --section-headers test.elf -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! My mind is making at ashtrays in Dayton visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Problem with executable

2006-05-19 Thread Grant Edwards
a.elf a.hex where $(OBJCOPY) is the path to your msp430-objcopy executable. Nonsense. Gdb knows how to load ELF files. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! I'm UNEMPLOYED! at visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Making and adding a library without msp430-ar

2006-06-13 Thread Grant Edwards
, then those symbols are going to have to be visible to the user, since it's the user that's going to be linking them together. Since your question is not specific to the MSP430, the best place to ask about specific binutils usage would probably be on the binutils mailing list. -- Grant Edwards

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Making and adding a library without msp430-ar

2006-06-14 Thread Grant Edwards
of thing itself. The third option is to link the object modules together then strip them (keeping only the symbols he wants to be visible). -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! .. here I am in 53 at B.C. and all I want

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Making and adding a library without msp430-ar

2006-06-14 Thread Grant Edwards
with gcc. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I have a very good at DENTAL PLAN. Thank you. visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gdbproxy v0.7.1

2006-06-19 Thread Grant Edwards
JTAG and hope to get that to work with GDB. The FreeRTOS web site says how to do this. I've used both the TI and Olimex parallel port JTAG interfaces with gdb under Linux. Both work fine. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Did I SELL OUT yet

[Mspgcc-users] Code generation question

2006-06-28 Thread Grant Edwards
mov.b 0x0034, r14 add r15, r14 mov r14, two ret -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Now that I have my at APPLE, I comprehend COST visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Code generation question

2006-06-30 Thread Grant Edwards
ignore it is a serious bug in my world. Damn. It might be time to spring for the Rowley compiler. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! My FAVORITE group at is QUESTION MARK THE visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Code generation question

2006-06-30 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-06-30, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: On 2006-06-30, David Brown da...@westcontrol.com wrote: Just for fun, I tried compiling the code with two changed to an unsigned char. My mps430 compiler (3.2.3) then gives mov.b P6IN, r15 rla.b r15 mov.b r15, two ret

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Code generation question

2006-06-30 Thread Grant Edwards
maintained? 3.2.3 is our stable version Is it getting bug fixes? the latest 4.x should be the next version, but it's not yet ready -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! YOU'D cry too if it at happened to YOU

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Code generation question

2006-07-03 Thread Grant Edwards
; Unless you declare two as volatile, the compiler is free to write to two twice. because this is what atomic write to a global variable means. We know what atomic write means. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Code generation question

2006-07-03 Thread Grant Edwards
that in order to be able to use any tool, you have to learn how to use that tool first. But is this like priesthood? Do I have to recite in Latin? No, just PDP-11 assembly language. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I am covered

[Mspgcc-users] bitfield code gen questions

2006-07-03 Thread Grant Edwards
jeq.L9 call #zxcv .L9: cmp.b #llo(0), 0x0020 jge.L8 call #zxcv .L8: ret It only saves one instruction, but that instruction is a jmp, so it's a big one if you're counting cycles. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow

Re: [Mspgcc-users] bitfield code gen questions

2006-07-03 Thread Grant Edwards
with with the macro you use to set bit. It always seemed so much cleaner to just do this: #define ADCEnable P3OUTb.b3 -- Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] bitfield code gen questions

2006-07-04 Thread Grant Edwards
(ledGreen); OutputEnable(ledGreen); while (1) { if (GetBit(inputSwitch)) { ResetBit(ledGreen); }; }; } I like that approach. Having to define more than one macro for a ping always seemed wrong. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I

Re: [Mspgcc-users] The USB FET tools under Linux

2006-07-09 Thread Grant Edwards
to resolve these sort of problems is to find out what has driven the kernel maintainers to make the change and modify your software accordingly (and pray the fix will continue to work with the next kernel version). -- Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] bitfield code gen questions

2006-07-13 Thread Grant Edwards
ought to. ;) When writing embedded stuff, you should always know what assembly code is going to be generated for a chunk of C code when you write it. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm losing my at hair...did it go

Re: [Mspgcc-users] checksum generation/embedding

2006-08-07 Thread Grant Edwards
for a telecommunications link (e.g. burst errors). IOW, people are paying a lot extra for something that may not even work as well as a far cheaper solution. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I've got a COUSIN at who works

Re: [Mspgcc-users] checksum generation/embedding

2006-08-07 Thread Grant Edwards
. If they don't match, it waits for a new app. It sounds like this can't be done with the GCC tools, so I'll have to do it manually. Whatever. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm a fuschia bowling at ball somewhere in Brittany

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430 FET - Locks Up

2006-08-08 Thread Grant Edwards
? Or, is there a way to prevent it from occurring? Are you powering the target from the JTAG interface? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm having an at EMOTIONAL OUTBURST!! But, visi.comuh

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430 FET - Locks Up

2006-08-08 Thread Grant Edwards
between the times when gdbproxy can/can't find the target. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! YOW!! I am having at FUN!! visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=42303 -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Nice decor! at visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
-bit DOS instruction when I try to run it. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Do I have a lifestyle at yet? visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
a board. The stations are used for other things, and our test-systems SW guy is still hooked on Visual Basic. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is this BOOZE? at visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
. The stations are used for other things, and our test-systems SW guy is still hooked on Visual Basic. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is this BOOZE? at visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
directory. Being able to provide a firmware update that has the firmware bundled with it will be pretty nice once a few units escape into the field. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm having a MID-WEEK at CRISIS

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
scheme that uses a different interface. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! This PIZZA symbolizes at my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL visi.comRECOVERY!!

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Simple program to burn flash via JTAG?

2006-08-31 Thread Grant Edwards
for end-user updates, since we're using a standardized physical layer and protocol that aren't BSL. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Psychoanalysis?? I at thought this was a nude visi.com

[Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-12 Thread Grant Edwards
[...] --bug.s-- Has this been fixed in newer versions? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! A dwarf is passing at out somewhere in Detroit! visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-12 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-09-12, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: My program is broken because mspgcc 3.2.3 is generating unaligned word accesses. I'm calling memset() and memcpy() fill in the fields in a packed struct. Since I've requested a 2-byte copy/set mspgcc is optimizing some of those memset

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-12 Thread Grant Edwards
alignment for operations greater than 1 byte long. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Will it improve my at CASH FLOW? visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-12 Thread Grant Edwards
to be used, then you're going to have to make char 16 bits wide. On an architecture with limited RAM, I don't think anybody's going to like that idea. Maybe I should check how the other MSP430 compilers handle this. Handle what? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-12 Thread Grant Edwards
seem to be taking a narrow view of efficiency. I wasn't thinking of speed, but of the size of the resulting code. That matters very much to any embedded developer. Why not just generate this then? l1: bra l1 It's very compact. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-12 Thread Grant Edwards
assignments to packed, misaligned structure fields don't check pointers before dereferencing them. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I've been WRITING at to SOPHIA LOREN every 45 visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
suggesting a compiler which refuses to compile 100% legal standard ANSI C source code. I just don't see how that's a real option. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! How many retired at bricklayers from FLORIDA

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
though one of the addresses was odd. Two mov.b instruction is perfect. It's exactly what the source specified. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Intra-mural sports at results are filtering

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430-profile

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
address bus through the JTAG interface while the cpu is running an normal speed. Tres Cool! -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Hmmm... A hash-singer at and a cross-eyed guy were visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
(communications frames), you've got no choice: things have to be where they have to be. If the compiler doesn't support direct accesses (assignments to/from) fields in packed structures, then you use memcpy() calls. I was, however, naively hoping for some meaningful discussion. -- Grant Edwards

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
it didn't get called? The NIOS2 target has a -mno-inline-memcpy flag for that exact situation. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Am I in GRADUATE at SCHOOL yet? visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-09-13, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: On 2006-09-13, Steve Hosgood st...@caederus.com wrote: w A thought... is it a valid optimisation to replace a routine like 'memcpy', assuming that 'memcpy' is the one from stdio.h? IMO, yes. What if the user wrote his own 'memcpy

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
to Australia on holiday for three weeks starting Saturday. You guys at AAD have any job openings? I've always wanted to see Antarctica... -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Jesuit priests are at DATING CAREER DIPLOMATS

Re: [Mspgcc-users] msp430-gcc generating unaligned access.

2006-09-13 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-09-13, Chris Liechti cliec...@gmx.net wrote: a fast and not too large memcopy/memset could copy the start and end separately using byte ops when odd, and copy the remaining data in beween with word moves. That's actually what the current libc memcpy does. -- Grant Edwards

[Mspgcc-users] New gdbproxy can't load program to flash?

2006-11-09 Thread Grant Edwards
that both recocgnizes newer devices and knows how to load to flash? [This is using the TI parallel port JTAG interface.] -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! There's a SALE on at STRETCH SOCKS down

Re: [Mspgcc-users] New gdbproxy can't load program to flash?

2006-11-09 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-09, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: The new gdb-proxy does recognize the 4270, but it can't program flash on an F148. The erase operation seems fine, but when I try to load an elf file, gdbproxy cpu usage goes to 100% and it just sits there forever spitting out debug

Re: [Mspgcc-users] New gdbproxy can't load program to flash?

2006-11-09 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-09, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: On 2006-11-09, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: The new gdb-proxy does recognize the 4270, but it can't program flash on an F148. The erase operation seems fine, but when I try to load an elf file, gdbproxy cpu usage goes to 100

Re: [Mspgcc-users] New gdbproxy can't load program to flash?

2006-11-09 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-09, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: After running both old and new msp430-gdbproxy binaries with debug mode enabled, it looks like the new one _is_ programming flash, it's just 10-20X slower than the old one. With the old binary, the msp430_write_mem() messages scroll

Re: [Mspgcc-users] New gdbproxy can't load program to flash?

2006-11-09 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-09, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: I just did a bit of benchmarking, and the new binary is 30X slower. Loading my 14K program into flash with the old binary took 22 seconds (5500bps). With the new one, it takes 522 seconds (223bps) -- that's almost 9 minutes. Increasing

Re: [Mspgcc-users] gdbproxy statistic, new features...

2006-11-10 Thread Grant Edwards
-- unless the configuration data is really so complex and nested that XML-bloat is really useful. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! YOW!! Up ahead! It's at a DONUT HUT!! visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] How to shut off debug msgs in msp430-gdbproxy?

2006-11-10 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-10, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: How do I shut off the debug messages in msp430-gdbproxy? This is getting really annoying Right now I'm using 'grep -v' to get rid of debug messages, but that seems like a bit of a kludge. -- Grant Edwards grante

[Mspgcc-users] Another gdbproxy problem: Watchdog has expired. Target detached.

2006-11-13 Thread Grant Edwards
to work?? Is the source code available somewhere so I can fix this (as well as the 1-packet-per second speed limit)? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! CHUBBY CHECKER owns at my BUILDING

[Mspgcc-users] Where is libhil.so?

2006-11-13 Thread Grant Edwards
According to http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/tools.html libhil.so is needed and available from our CVS repository. WHERE IN CVS THE REPOSITORY IS IT? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I know th'MAMBO!! I at have a TWO

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Another gdbproxy problem: Watchdog has expired. Target detached.

2006-11-13 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-13, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: Since upgrading to a version of gdb-proxy that recognizes recent parts, I've been unable to stop the processor while it's running. Whenever I attempt to stop a running program, gdb reports: Watchdog has expired. Target detached. msp430

[Mspgcc-users] Is anybody maintaining msp430-gdbserver?

2006-11-14 Thread Grant Edwards
Is msp430-gdbserver still being maintained? Downloading via parallel port and the --debug option both seem to have been broken since April. Is there any way one can get access to the source code in order to fix these problems? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Is anybody maintaining msp430-gdbserver?

2006-11-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-14, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: Is msp430-gdbserver still being maintained? Um, I obviously meant msp430-gdbproxy. There's a program with identical functionality for the Altera NIOS2 JTAG interface that's called a server rather than a proxy and I can't ever keep straight

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Is anybody maintaining msp430-gdbserver?

2006-11-14 Thread Grant Edwards
this for months, but the response seems to be use a different program. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm young... I'm at HEALTHY... I can HIKE visi.comTHRU CAPT GROGAN'S LUMBAR

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Is anybody maintaining msp430-gdbserver?

2006-11-15 Thread Grant Edwards
the old one was transferring 30 frames per second. There has definitely been a slowdown, though. The USB tools are much faster, but that probably doesn't help you. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Two with FLUFFO

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Another gdbproxy problem: Watchdog has expired. Target detached.

2006-11-15 Thread Grant Edwards
the commented out line instead, it's fine. Does gdbproxy only call setsid() if stdout/stederr is a tty? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! Am I in at Milwaukee? visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Is anybody maintaining msp430-gdbserver?

2006-11-16 Thread Grant Edwards
to the tools page at http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/tools.html? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Where does it go when at you flush? visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] internal error: unsupported relocation error confusion

2006-11-21 Thread Grant Edwards
License. This program has absolutely no warranty. $ -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Hmmm... A hash-singer at and a cross-eyed guy were visi.comSLEEPING on a deserted

Re: [Mspgcc-users] internal error: unsupported relocation errorconfusion

2006-11-21 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-21, N. Coesel n...@nctdev.nl wrote: If long int is a 64 bit variable, expect GCC to be broken. Are there any versions of mspgcc where long int is 64 bits? Up through at least 3.2, long int is always 32 bits. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Why do variables in .infomem get initialized?

2006-11-21 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-21, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: [...] I expected the the .infomem section to have the @nobits attribute, but it is @progbits. Duh. That's what the section .infomemnobits is for. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! Those people

Re: [Mspgcc-users] information memory

2006-11-27 Thread Grant Edwards
are selected with the BLKWRT, WRT, MERAS, and ERASE bits and are: - Byte/word write - Block write - Segment Erase - Mass Erase (all main memory segments) - All Erase (all segments) AFAIK, the flash controller is the same in all current parts. -- Grant Edwards

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc observations (long)

2006-11-27 Thread Grant Edwards
HOWTO for msp430-gdbproxy via USB under Linux, I'd be glad to test it. :) -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Put FIVE DOZEN red at GIRDLES in each CIRCULAR visi.comOPENING!!

[Mspgcc-users] Clue on installing msp430-jtag?

2006-11-27 Thread Grant Edwards
/msp430. Can somebody loan me a clue on how to install msp430-jtag? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I wonder if I could at ever get started in the visi.comcredit world?

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Clue on installing msp430-jtag?

2006-11-27 Thread Grant Edwards
the installer) Yea, it took me an embarassingly long time to notice the makefile. I always use Makefile and my brain only looks at the beginning of the 'ls' for makefiles now. :/ -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I am having

Re: [Mspgcc-users] mspgcc observations (long)

2006-11-27 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-11-27, Ben Williamson b...@pobox.com wrote: I cobbled together the attached script, works for me. This is far from authoritative, but I hope it helps. Thanks! I'll give it a try. I've had an ez430 laying on my desk for months... -- Grant Edwards grante

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Getting started with MSP430 GCC GDB Insight

2006-12-03 Thread Grant Edwards
;// 's' is a dummy variable ... does not have to be dummy // this is needed to fix a bug preventing GDB to run properly (data section initialization problem) -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'd like some JUNK

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Switching on volatile values

2006-12-09 Thread Grant Edwards
are not permitted to generate incorrect code regardless of optimization settings. [1] Unless I misunderstood the C standard's requirement for the implementation of volatile variables. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! When this load

[Mspgcc-users] unnecessarily large frame sizes?

2007-02-14 Thread Grant Edwards
want to keep RAM usage down to a reasonable value, seems to be to use global variables everywhere possible and do the lifetime overlapping checking in your head. Ew. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Everybody is going

Re: [Mspgcc-users] unnecessarily large frame sizes?

2007-02-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2007-02-14, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: I've noticed that msp430-gcc 3.2.3 often generates unnecessarily large frame sizes? For example for a function containing a large switch statement, the frame size will be the _sum_ of the frame sizes required for each of the cases

Re: [Mspgcc-users] unnecessarily large frame sizes?

2007-02-14 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2007-02-14, Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com wrote: It's not as bad as it initially looked for this case. There's still some unexplained frame size overhead though. I can take a function like this which has a frame size of 32: void foo() { line1; line2; line3; line4; line5

Re: [Mspgcc-users] unnecessarily large frame sizes?

2007-02-15 Thread Grant Edwards
sizes (about 25% smaller than -O2) with almost no code size penalty compared to -O2. Frame sizes blow up pretty badly using -O3 because functions that are only called once are get inlined. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I want a VEGETARIAN

Re: [Mspgcc-users] unnecessarily large frame sizes?

2007-02-16 Thread Grant Edwards
- it is better to be explicit in your source code than relying on the compiler flags chosen when compiling. Good point. There's nothing to prevent -O1 from deciding to inline a function in future versions. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow

Re: [Mspgcc-users] eclipse, mspgcc-gdb, sigint

2007-02-19 Thread Grant Edwards
or not. After you've hit Ctrl-C, is the gdb-proxy process gone? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Jesus is my at POSTMASTER GENERAL... visi.com

Re: [Mspgcc-users] eclipse, mspgcc-gdb, sigint

2007-02-19 Thread Grant Edwards
talking to a separate gdb process through pipes or if it's actually linked with gdb and using it's machine-interface API. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is it FUN to be at a MIDGET

Re: [Mspgcc-users] eclipse, mspgcc-gdb, sigint

2007-02-19 Thread Grant Edwards
a not quite newbee on eclipse. Do you know of a eclipse-cdt users list that I could search or query? Or anywhere else for that matter. I have plans to use the cygwin/gnu/eclipse tools for an ARM project coming up fast. Sorry -- I know pretty much zero about eclipse. -- Grant Edwards

  1   2   3   4   >