Re: [mssms] SCCM 2007 primary site still publishing to AD

2014-07-21 Thread Brian McDonald
Are there any risks involved with the leaving it there? Thanks, Brian Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2014, at 11:37 PM, CE5AR.ABREG0 elsal...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. It usually gets removed when SCCM is uninstall but in case is left, it's safe to just delete it. Cesar A. Meaning

Re: [mssms] SCCM 2007 primary site still publishing to AD

2014-07-21 Thread Sherry Kissinger
Boundary issues.  Your clients could (and likely will) look up what it should do for content or site assignment and see the old entries, and want to use those replies...which are clearly useless. You'll get client boundary issues all over the place.  Which will be easily resolved by clearing

RE: [mssms] WoL dependencies

2014-07-21 Thread Nash Pherson
Ryan's three part guide is pretty good: http://ephingadmin.com/wp/a-configmgr-admins-guide-to-wol-magic-part-one/ http://ephingadmin.com/wp/a-configmgr-admins-guide-to-wol-magic-part-two/ http://ephingadmin.com/wp/a-configmgr-admins-guide-to-wol-magic-packet-part-three/ From:

RE: [mssms] Content not being distributed to newly installed DP (CM07)

2014-07-21 Thread Atkinson, Matt
Just to make sure I report back on what resolved the problem for this DP, had to uncheck the box that enabled BITS for the DP before it would start transferring the content. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Hethcote Sent:

Re: [mssms] WoL dependencies

2014-07-21 Thread Brian McDonald
Awesome thanks!! Sent from my iPhone On Jul 21, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Nash Pherson na...@nowmicro.com wrote: Ryan’s three part guide is pretty good: http://ephingadmin.com/wp/a-configmgr-admins-guide-to-wol-magic-part-one/

[mssms] Cross forest

2014-07-21 Thread Thomas Gonzalez
Anyone have a good explanation on cross forest? I've seen anoop's write up..but the item in confused is; untrusted domain, service account in other domain given ability to read. But does the untrusted sccm need publishing permissions?, Thomas Gonzalez

RE: [mssms] WoL dependencies

2014-07-21 Thread John Aubrey
The best guides I have seen. Do most people use AMT with WOL? I’m thinking of getting a cert and going with AMT. It seems to be a lot messier to set up though. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald Sent: Monday, July 21,

RE: [mssms] Content not being distributed to newly installed DP (CM07)

2014-07-21 Thread elsalvoz
Thanks. Interesting too. Cesar On Jul 21, 2014 8:06 AM, Atkinson, Matt matt.atkin...@providence.org wrote: Just to make sure I report back on what resolved the problem for this DP, had to uncheck the box that enabled BITS for the DP before it would start transferring the content.

Re: [mssms] Cross forest

2014-07-21 Thread elsalvoz
No. We have multiple untrusted domains, all you need is service accounts in both sides, though, we don't publish anything in or from the untrusted domains. Cesar On Jul 21, 2014 8:18 AM, Thomas Gonzalez tgonza...@tins-swtx.com wrote: Anyone have a good explanation on cross forest? I've seen

RE: [mssms] Cross forest

2014-07-21 Thread Thomas Gonzalez
So let me understand this correctly; Domain A needs to discover Domain B (untrusted) with a service account from Domain A Domain B (untrusted) needs service account from Domain A to discover Domain A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of

[mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Ewing, Scott L
http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2014/07/21/announcing_3a00_-microsofts-unified-technology-event-for-enterprises.aspx Announcing: Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises Microsoft Server and Cloud Platform

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Rod Trent
This is exactly why “right-sized” technical events like the new MMS and IT/Dev Connections will be the wave of the future. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ewing, Scott L Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:17 PM To:

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Atkinson, Matt
I don’t understand how it is any different than TechEd? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 9:26 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

[mssms] PowerShell noob question

2014-07-21 Thread Murray, Mike
I'm trying to deploy a PowerShell script that will add a security group to the administrators group on all the machines in a particular collection. I found the script below. Can you tell me if my example below that will work properly? Or would I be better of simply running net localgroup

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Rod Trent
The name professed today is just an interim name. They’ll announced the official new name in September. One of the decision makers is out of the country until just before then. And, you’re exactly right. If you want technical learning for your job *today*, you’ll want to look at the

Re: [mssms] Cross forest

2014-07-21 Thread elsalvoz
Domain A is your primary and Domain B is untrusted. Domain A needs a services account from B in order for Domain A to discover resources in Domain B. You specify Srv-B/pass when setting discovery This domain A's discovery config. btw. you need write your LDAP path initially. [image: Inline

[mssms] RE: PowerShell noob question

2014-07-21 Thread Jason Sandys
While I do love PowerShell, simple is better (that's why PowerShell is generally better than most other automation solutions - it's simple). In this case, the net command is as simple as you can get and has no explicit external dependencies like ADSI. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Jason Sandys
I’ve heard “Microsoft World”. My guess is “Microsoft One”. Although given their love of “Cloud”, maybe they’ll find some twist on that, like “Microsoft Cloud World” or “Cloudy with Microsoft”. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Lindenfeld, Ivan
ROFL. Cloudy with a chance of System Center From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:04 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises I’ve

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Daniel Ratliff
Cloudy with no chance of ConfigMgr? Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:12 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Rod Trent
Guess this means no “Day 5” event since they are extending it back to 5 full days. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:24 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's

[mssms] RE: PowerShell noob question

2014-07-21 Thread Murray, Mike
Thanks, Jason! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: PowerShell noob question While I do love PowerShell, simple is better (that's why

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Stephen Leuthold
Hence the gap that the community-based events hope to fulfill... The real world as marketing does not know it. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Rod Trentmailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com Sent: ‎7/‎21/‎2014 12:33 PM To:

RE: [mssms] HW inventory scan schedule

2014-07-21 Thread Ewing, Scott L
1. What is your hardware inventory scan schedule set to? Daily 2. How many clients are in your environment? 13,000 Windows 7 SCCM 2012 SP1 CU3 clients 3. Are you still experiencing a large number of BadMIFs? No From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 and Request Filtering

2014-07-21 Thread Miller, Todd
On SCCM 2012 distribution points, with the move away from IIS WebDAV, is request filtering for file types still a concern? I had to unblock several file types on my 2007 DPs, and I wonder if I need to do the same for 2012 DPs. What about those hidden segment setting that were so critical in

[mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 and Request Filtering

2014-07-21 Thread Daniel Ratliff
Yes, we still need to set the IIS filters on our DPs. Running 2012 R2 CU1. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 2:09 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 and

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Marcum, John
An event that size is just plain dumb! No organization can allow that many employees from various teams to be at the same conference. Unless MS has invented IT autopilot. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent Sent: Monday, July 21,

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Daniel Wolf
With the Cloud you don’t even need IT anymore. I think you’re missing the concept here, people. Daniel Wolf From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:38 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Niehaus
25K isn’t the target – I don’t think there are any facilities in the US (outside of a complete Vegas takeover) that can effectively handle a training event of that size. I wouldn’t expect the “new, evolved TechEd” to be much bigger (if bigger at all) than the current TechEd. Thanks, -Michael

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Marcum, John
HOUSTON, Texas – Here are some nuggets to nibble on about the George R. Brown Convention Center: Super roomy With seating capacity to accommodate 72,000 people, the George R. Brown Convention Center can seat every person who attended Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston in 2004. End-to-end zone How

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Niehaus
Maybe if you want an event spanning multiple buildings, or if you want one gigantic room filled with 100K chairs ☺ Thanks, -Michael From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:03 PM To:

Re: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Todd Hemsell
yes, in several location including reliant arena (where the rodeo is) On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Marcum, John jmar...@babc.com wrote: I had heard that there's an oil and gas convention in Houston that's 100K *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Marcum, John
The largest convention center in the US just happens to be in Chicago. http://comicsbeat.com/which-us-convention-center-is-biggest/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Niehaus Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 2:12 PM To:

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Rod Trent
Cabbie told me Houston’s largest conference was a bit over that number, and it was a quilting conference. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 3:03 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE:

[mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 and Request Filtering

2014-07-21 Thread Jason Sandys
Yep. The request filters have nothing to do with WebDAV, they are IIS filters. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:14 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 and

[mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 and Request Filtering

2014-07-21 Thread Miller, Todd
OK. Thanks. What about Kerberos authentication? On SCCM 2007 distribution points it was basically required to switch to Kerberos session based authentication (authPersistNonNTLM = True) to improve performance and reduce load on AD and firewalls.

[mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 and Request Filtering

2014-07-21 Thread Jason Sandys
Per that article, this is applicable to both IIS 6 and 7 so it should be the same. I wouldn't call these required by any means. Most implementations of ConfigMgr I have done I've never done either and never had an issue. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Marable, Mike
Know much about quilting? LOLLL And what is wrong with quilting? After 50-60 hours a week in the office spending some time doing some English Paper Piecing goes a long way to help with the sanity. What? :) Sent from my iPhone On Jul 21, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Marcum, John jmar...@babc.com

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread steven hosking
Can I get a beanie? :D From: Marable, Mikemailto:mmara...@med.umich.edu Sent: ‎22/‎07/‎2014 7:20 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Cc: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Microsoft's unified

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Mott
With a propeller! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of steven hosking Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 5:27 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises Can I get a beanie? :D