NT
You might be able to script something as part of your installation, to
shutdown IE11 or use the Powershell App Deployment Toolkit to help.
Powerful - Provides a set of functions to perform common deployment tasks, such
as installing or uninstalling multiple applications, prompting users to
FYI, Internet Explorer is specifically presented in the PSADT as an option for
closing prior to installation.
-Phil
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Mike Dzikowski
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:59 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
I get asked from time to time to produce a compliance report for a specific
server on its overall compliance for ALL patches (security, updates, critical,
etc..) released from Microsoft. I thought the simple compliance report for a
specific computer would do the trick, but it will only list
There's a pretty one in here:
http://www.madisonusergroup.com/2012/11/28/octobernovember-2012-meeting-notes/
which basically has this as one of the queries inside; it's for an srs report
of course, so the resourceid is obtained from a prompt for a computername, to
be used in this Dataset.
I
Hi Ransom,
Is this issue fixed. Im also getting same error.
Using SCCM 2012 R2 CU2 installed.--(client version also updated)
Inorder to deploy windows 7 , I have installed ADK 8.0 on separate windows
7 machine, THen copied those boot files in SCCM 2012 Primary and updated
the DP's
In client
I'm far from an expert on compliance setting, but I think you should be able to
switch the rule type to existential instead of value.
You aren't getting a value of the hotfix ID wmi entry, you just want to check
if it exists.
I'll let others chime in if I'm way off with my solution, always
Duh ... agree ... thanks Matt !
Will reply with results ... so far looks like using Existential is working.
Shane
From: matt.atkin...@providence.org
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 - Compliance settings - Hotfix
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:23:03 +
I’m
Otherwise, yeah the value should be KB2732673 if you aren't using existential
On July 24, 2014 5:23:03 PM CDT, Atkinson, Matt
matt.atkin...@providence.org wrote:
I'm far from an expert on compliance setting, but I think you should be
able to switch the rule type to existential instead of value.
Thanks for sending these, they are fantastic for a custom report beginner like
myself.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 8:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Call for
Thanks Sherry.
Existential has worked ... and also proved a non-compliant hotfix by using a
dummy KB number (KB299)
Shane
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 - Compliance settings - Hotfix
From: slkissin...@sbcglobal.net
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:51:07 -0500
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
I am seeing an issue where newly created device objects in VMware aren't seeing
a required TS that is being applied to a collection in which they are a part of.
Current environment.
SCCM 2012 R2 running SQL 2012 on Windows 2012. DPs, PXE, and WDS running on
separate Windows 2012 server.
Posted this also in the mdt-osd forum...
I am seeing an issue where newly created device objects in VMware aren't seeing
a required TS that is being applied to a collection in which they are a part of.
Current environment.
SCCM 2012 R2 running SQL 2012 on Windows 2012. DPs, PXE, and WDS
FYI . I currently have a case open with Microsoft Premier Support regarding
Compliance Settings.
As of right now, it is not possible to execute a Remediation Script, when
you are using an existential rule. If you are using a value-based rule, your
Discovery Script must output something, in
Hi all,
This afternoon I've deployed the latest patches to our ~1500 workstation fleet
and I'm seeing 95% network utilisation on the site server. This is a process
I've performed for years and have never seen anything like it. Was hoping for
troubleshooting suggestions.
Daniel.
15 matches
Mail list logo
