The EULA Required Updates will appear in All Updates even if not accepted. So I
think you have a similar problem to David?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: 14 October 2014 16:00
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject:
I recently had to do something similar. Office baked in and needed a different
config for a site. So I created a new msp and patched office during the ts,
worked fine.
This was adding a couple of components and redefining the default profile but
you can quite easily create a msp to remove
Andrew.
Fyi they did not appear in All Updates as they had not synched successfully due
to EULA. Once synched they obviously were available.
On 15 Oct 2014, at 07:22, Andrew Craig andrew.cr...@syliance.com wrote:
The EULA Required Updates will appear in All Updates even if not accepted.
Hi Paul,
Yeah, I am going in circles, I missed that you are having sync issues. I should
have said, the Updates will appear even if EULA is not yet accepted, as long as
they are properly synchronized. But if the EULA data is missing or corrupt then
sure they won’t show up. Then a full resync
Andrew,
No worries. Issue was due to misconfig of the remote SUP's and I am testing
this today but I'm certain all will be ok. The EULA hadn't downloaded due
to issues writing to the WSUS content location therefore the synch had
never completed hence nothing in All Updates.
Anyway I feel I have
Hi Trevor,
Thanks for your suggestion. You're probably right that a wrapper script will
most likely work. I have decided to advertise the application after the TS has
finished and run it under the user context. (User has administrative rights).
Best regards,
Sander
Van:
Russ - followed the TechNet article and it still fails. EULA not
downloaded.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Russ Rimmerman
russ.rimmer...@microsoft.com wrote:
You’re sharing the same wsuscontent share on each SUP correct? You
should follow pretty much the same process documented on the
What's the difference between WID and DB when configuring WSUS for SCCM? Does
it matter which one is used?
Thanks,
Brian
Recreating the Task Sequences, CustomSettings package which is process during
the Gather step, the WinPE images, MDT Files image appears to have fixed the
issue.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Niehaus
Sent: Tuesday, October 14,
WID is Windows Internal Database, DB would be using a SQL database. I generally
install the WSUS database on the SQL server the site server is using rather
than WID.
Check this out:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc708452(v=ws.10).aspx
Thanks,
Justin Chalfant
Premier Field
I used the built in database. I was worried about SQL licenses. If I remember
correctly I had it set up with SQL in a previous deployment and SCOM wasn't
happy with it. Constantly throwing up alerts.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
Have you gone through
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc708545(v=ws.10).aspx to confirm
all your permissions are correct, especially the WSUSContent items under the
“Permissions/Disk” section?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
This article seems to say this isn't possible. If you could share exactly how
you're doing this, I'd appreciate it!
http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/access-help/install-or-remove-individual-office-programs-and-components-HA010354261.aspx
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
system was unknown, so i prestaged it and still not working.
I see this in the smspxe.log Doesn't this all appear good? i've already tried
rebuilding the server and rebootin and all that. Folks in other areas can pxe.
[010.212.017.015:4011] Recv From:[010.222.128.054:68] Len:303 ba11d8 smspxe
I am trying to write a query which returns all systems that are not in a
certain OU, but those systems still get returned.
This query works and returns the 32 items it should:
select * from SMS_R_System where SMS_R_System.SystemOUName = OUName
This query returns 1963 items, but includes the
If you’re trying to build a collection, here’s a lazy way out – create a
collection of computers in that OU, then exclude that collection in in the new
collection.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Gushue, William
Sent: Wednesday, October
Use a subselect query that basically returns all systems that are “not in” the
query that works.
Bruce Hethcote | Technical Training Team
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Gushue, William
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 2:57 PM
To:
select * from SMS_R_System where SMS_R_System.ResourceID not in (select
ResourceID from SMS_R_System where SMS_R_System.SystemOUName = OUName)
William
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on behalf
of Gushue, William bgus...@osler.com
Sent: Wednesday, October
Sure it’s possible, you just need to use a nested query.
Something like
Select * from SMS_R_System
where ResourceID not in
(select ResourceID from SMS_R_System
Where SystemOUName = ‘OUName’
)
-Phil
_
Phil Schwan | Technical
Garth just put out some nice blog posts about sub-select queries too.
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2014/09/25/subselect-wql-query-to-find-pcs-that-do-not-have-either-x86-or-x64-versions-of-software-installed/
You will need a subselect query. These blog post will help you.
http://be.enhansoft.com/post/2014/09/17/The-Subselect-Query.aspx
http://be.enhansoft.com/post/2014/09/24/Subselect-Query-for-SCCM-Queries-or-Collections-(WQL).aspx
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Jeff Gilbert has now finished and posted up a fantastic doc on TechNet for
Windows OS deployments.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn818437.aspx
I thought I had tried the subselect and it did not work, but I tried it just
now and it does. I think I was looking at the numbers as the subselect returns
1957 when it should return 1931, but I just compared the collection to OU and
none of those systems are in the subselect. Thanks to all
That is what I am trying to do and I’ll keep this for future reference. Good
idea. Thanks, Mike.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE:
Hey folks,
Just curious how many days you retain your logs and what size you set for the
limit to ensure user device affinity works properly?
Thanks,
Mike
Sent from Windows Mail
Select * from SMS_R_System Where SMS_R_System.SystemOUName = OUName And
SMS_R_System.SystemOUName != OHHLLP.COM/IS/COMPUTERS
Rob Carlson | Senior SMS - Patch Management Engineer
Vanguard 2.2.1 Contract | SAIC Team | Strategic Business Systems
Supporting IRM/OPS/ENM/PSD/SLM
Desk phone: (703)
And I know this depends on what we're logging. I guess I'm more interested in #
of days than anything.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Phone Ownermailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu
Sent: ?Wednesday?, ?October? ?15?, ?2014 ?1?:?28? ?PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Hey
We have a similar situation, though it's pretty close to a 50/50 split between
machines with Outlook (staff machines) and machines without (student lab
machines). We have our image building task sequence generate two images (with
the only difference being the Outlook config) and then merge them
Permissions on the disk are absolutely fine and I have compared these to
the Technet article. No matter what I am attempting to do I cannot get the
remote SUP to sync and download the EULA.
So to recap the scenario is:
Local SQL on site server. No SUP installed on site server and SUP installed
Hi All,
Is there a way to install Software Updates via ConfigMgr but not have a reboot
forced on the user? Even after the deadline is reached.
Basically we just want the updates to install and the computer will just
restart whenever the user does it.
I know this is not ideal but currently
Never tried to do it... but I presume these tick boxes are what you are after
On the Property of the Deployment of the patch group
[cid:image001.jpg@01CFE939.E80345D0]
MAGNUS TVETEN
SERVER SUPPORT ENGINEER
CO CITRIX/SERVER
Insurance Australia Group Limited
Lvl 1,
I do have those boxes ticked but I believe once it hits a deadline then it will
still pop up with the notification and restart the machine.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Magnus Tveten
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2014 11:39 AM
To:
There's a Computer Restart component in the Client Settings policy located
under the Administration tab.
-Harjit
On Oct 15, 2014, at 10:18 PM, Chad Beard cbe...@artc.com.au wrote:
I do have those boxes ticked but I believe once it hits a deadline then it
will still pop up with the
Hi all,
Before I go and check in my lab and potentially reinvent the wheel, has
anybody got a query at hand that can be executed on a ConfigMgr client and
check if it has installed all required deployments?
In this case I am specifically talking about Software Updates, but I guess
that
Hi,
I know of that option but you can only set from 1 minute to 24 hours. There
isn’t an option to disable it.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Harjit Dhaliwal
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2014 1:13 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
I have it in one of my scripts. I'll get it for you tomorrow, when I'm in
the office. Btw, the returns are tricky. There is table in TechNet that
maps each return integer. I will try to find it.
Cesar
On Oct 15, 2014 8:07 PM, David O'Brien obrien.da...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi all,
Before I go
Your deployment has a setting that say disable reboot on
server/workstation. Select those boxes.
Cesar
On Oct 15, 2014 8:20 PM, Chad Beard cbe...@artc.com.au wrote:
Hi,
I know of that option but you can only set from 1 minute to 24 hours.
There isn’t an option to disable it.
*From:*
37 matches
Mail list logo
