[mssms] Configuration Manager Local SQL Best Practice Documentation

2016-09-07 Thread Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Hi Everyone, Can anyone point me to the Microsoft TechNet documentation where they recommend that SQL be installed locally where a Primary Site has 50,000 clients or less? I’ve found a couple of blogs where people mentioned this but nothing specific from Microsoft. I’ve also found a number of

Re: [mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Eric Morrison
Pretty sure it's alphabetical from what I've seen in the past. Once you pass https over http. Get Outlook for iOS On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM -0500, "Todd Hemsell" wrote: DP selection is not load balanced or anything. Are these in the same boundaries? If so then

Re: [mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Todd Hemsell
DP selection is not load balanced or anything. Are these in the same boundaries? If so then SCCM just picks them in some order and never varies. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Jason Wallace wrote: > Yes - none of my DPs are enabled for HTTPS but one is on the same box as

[mssms] RE: Bitlocker recovery keys - MBAM console vs. AD

2016-09-07 Thread Murray, Mike
Although we do have a similar setting under Windows Components\BitLocker.\Operating System Drives - Choose how BitLocker-protected operating systems drives can be recovered From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Zarzycki, Mariusz (GIT-IOWD)
Maybe stupid answer but did You check boundaries/boundaries groups/ assigned DPs to? Best regards, Mariusz Zarzycki Sent using iPhone Sorry for typos Dnia 07.09.2016 o godz. 16:25 Jason Wallace napisał(a): > Hi folks > > I have 2 systems both configured (as close as

[mssms] RE: Bitlocker recovery keys - MBAM console vs. AD

2016-09-07 Thread Murray, Mike
That key is not set. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Schwan Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 11:54 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Bitlocker recovery keys - MBAM console vs. AD What GPOs do you have in

[mssms] RE: Bitlocker recovery keys - MBAM console vs. AD

2016-09-07 Thread Phil Schwan
What GPOs do you have in place for the systems in question? In particular, do you have the GPO option enabled or disabled for storing the recovery key in AD? Path: Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\BitLocker Drive Encryption Setting: Store BitLocker recovery

Re: [mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Jason Wallace
And like an idiot he realises his error. If you have the DP and MP sharing the Default Web Site then you only have the ability to support HTTPS on the server when the only binding on default web site is HTTPS Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:51, Marcum, John

Re: [mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Jason Wallace
Yes - none of my DPs are enabled for HTTPS but one is on the same box as an MP which is. It is this DP which is not getting hit at all. Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:51, Marcum, John wrote: > > Seems like it should be the other way around: > > Before a

RE: [mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Marcum, John
Seems like it should be the other way around: Before a client can communicate with a site system role, the client uses service location to find a site system role that supports the client's protocol (HTTP or HTTPS). By default, clients use the most secure method available to them:

[mssms] DP selection

2016-09-07 Thread Jason Wallace
Hi folks I have 2 systems both configured (as close as I can see it) identically as both DP and MP. The only difference between them is that one of the systems is configured as HTTPS for the MP role while the other is HTTP. Looking at IIS logs however one of the DPs (the non HTTPS MP) is