RE: [mssms] LogLauncher tool

2016-11-30 Thread Murray, Mike
Ah, got it. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bateman, Vern Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] LogLauncher tool Run the log Launcher as Admin, as the ccm logs directory can

[mssms] RE: Current Branch - Internet Based CLients - Internet facing Site Server Need to be on domain?

2016-11-30 Thread Burke, John
Hmm Thanks a bunch. I did do a quick look on technet.. but I’m likely just blind. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: November-30-16 4:47 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Current Branch - Internet

RE: [mssms] LogLauncher tool

2016-11-30 Thread Murray, Mike
When I run on my machine, I only see 14 logs, none are ConfigMgr logs. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Robert Marshall Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:18 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] LogLauncher tool

RE: [mssms] RE: Current Branch have something Similar to "computer details" from 2007?

2016-11-30 Thread Burke, John
Thanks I’ll take a look. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: November-30-16 4:37 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Current Branch have something Similar to "computer details" from 2007? not as

[mssms] RE: Current Branch - Internet Based CLients - Internet facing Site Server Need to be on domain?

2016-11-30 Thread Jason Sandys
The below is correct, current, and applicable to ConfigMgr CB: it must be domain joined. I’ve heard of this being side-stepped through some creative work, but that wouldn’t be supported (or advisable IMO). J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

RE: [mssms] LogLauncher tool

2016-11-30 Thread Neil Mulvaney
Great Tool. Thanks for the info. Neil From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2016 7:08 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] LogLauncher tool Just tried it out. I’m unsure exactly why but

RE: [mssms] LogLauncher tool

2016-11-30 Thread Burke, John
Just tried it out. I’m unsure exactly why but it didn’t pick up the sccm logs in syswow64 This may be as intended. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Robert Marshall Sent: November-30-16 8:08 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject:

[mssms] Current Branch - Internet Based CLients - Internet facing Site Server Need to be on domain?

2016-11-30 Thread Burke, John
Hi We are setting this up now and it’s in a dmz and a workgroup. I happened to read this via this link. Hoping it’s not the case. It’s Couple years old, and is Configmgr 2012 but I thought recalled something somewhere. I’m guessing Reza would be able to answer this off the top of his head.

[mssms] RE: Current Branch have something Similar to "computer details" from 2007?

2016-11-30 Thread Burke, John
Thanks. Not something that can be Hacked in before hand? ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: November-30-16 11:55 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Current Branch have something Similar to "computer

RE: [mssms] RE: WOL not waking powered off computers

2016-11-30 Thread Ed Aldrich
Just getting caught up here… those of us who monitor this alias were all at the MVP Summit when this was posted. I was at least, followed by a couple weeks of running around… That said, I have to say that the “disable fast startup’ fix was a new one to me! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[mssms] RE: Current Branch have something Similar to "computer details" from 2007?

2016-11-30 Thread Daniel Ratliff
Hopefully coming in 1702/1703. A pretty awesome client dashboard was put together in the hackathon at the MVP Summit a few weeks ago. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:23 AM

[mssms] Current Branch have something Similar to "computer details" from 2007?

2016-11-30 Thread Burke, John
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/bb633263.aspx Hi, I use this every day in 2007. I’m wondering if I’m just missing where to find something similar in current branch.

[mssms] [mssms} SSRS report 'Compliance 5 - Specific computer'

2016-11-30 Thread HELMS, DAVID C
I'm trying to get a better understanding of what this report is supposed to provide me. My thought was that it lists all the patches installed and what's required on a device but that doesn't appear to be the case. I am finding patches that are required and installed on the server not

[mssms] LogLauncher tool

2016-11-30 Thread Robert Marshall
I wrote this LogLauncher tool over a few days, not had much testing done, works well in my environment, wondering if folks can let me know if it runs AOK in theirs and if it is useful, what else it can benefit from doing. Comes with a handy MSI to install. You can point LogLauncher at a client,

RE: [mssms] BITS set via DCM off boundary, IP, or subnet

2016-11-30 Thread Andreas Hammarskjöld
Are you looking to use BranchCache anytime in the future? If so, then use the more modern windows 7 policies and not that ol’d XP stuff. (Or maybe you still got XP as you are in healthcare?) We set BITS policy “on the fly” and moved away from direct registry pokes as it is only read when the