Re: [External] Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

have you selected 'ignore dismissable errors' or whatever that option is on both the upgrade check and actual upgrade operating system steps ? On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matt Gerding wrote: > Thanks for all the input. > > > > It’s frustrating because after

[mssms] RE: Collection query weirdness

The first part appears to be getting the info from 'System Resource' While the one after the OR is getting it from 'Operating System' So if there are some machines that have not reporting in HW Inventory and Populated the 'Operation System' with its info they would not show up Depending on how

[mssms] Collection query weirdness

Can someone explain this to me? The query below returns fewer results than if I just use the first part of the query. Adding the "or" option drops the total results. Seems wrong to me. Best Regards, Mike Murray Desktop Engineer/IT Consultant - IT Support Services California State

[mssms] RE: Network Access Account - restricted logon to with server in the list and unknown OSD Fails..

I’ve handled the scenario you’re after with setting deny user rights, which worked without issues. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: donderdag 19 januari 2017 15:19 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE:

RE: [External] Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

There is a log file in there as well. I just search *.log and the two that pop up give a good understanding of what was going on. Seems like once SCCM run the setup.exe, it hands everything off to the setup. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

RE: [External] Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

Thanks for all the input. It’s frustrating because after putting in a lot of troubleshooting effort, we can get one working, but then what worked on one PC, doesn’t work for the next failure. Too much inconsistency. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]

RE: [External] Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

Not quick and easy, but if you parse through the xml files (C:\$WINDOWS.~BT\Sources\Panther\) you will find driver or app detail on what caused the failure. You would be looking for HardBlock which is what stops the upgrade. Cordell Melin From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [External] Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

I’m currently in the middle of a Win10 readiness project, and we have a high rate of failure with the in-place upgrade task sequence. I’m currently at about a 13% failure rate. Frustratingly, the logs only give that generic error code. It never says what it actually conflicted with. I have

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

Similar issues for me, Win7 SP1 enterprise x64 to Win10 1607 Enterprise x64. Most were resolved by deploying KB2952664. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Matt Gerding Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:39 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

yeah we saw a lot of failures at first but got around most of them by using logic to detect for those things causing failures in no specific order bit9 sep on a vpn not meeting requirements lack of disc space etc.. we are using a customized version of this

Re: [mssms] Does On-Premises MDM require Intune subscriptions for each device?

The surface hubs run Windows 10 Team edition. It does appear to be x64 based, but it only allows UWP apps to be installed and used, similar to how RT only supported windows 8 'modern' apps. There doesn't even seem to be a way to get a prompt on it from what I've seen so far. As for what I want

Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

Any third-party VPNs? Those and Anti-Virus were responsible for the biggest roadblocks On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Matt Gerding wrote: > They are all Win7 SP1 enterprise x64 to Win10 1607 Enterprise x64. I don’t > think we have applied the KB2952664. When

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

I ran into difficulties with a few customers (duplicate profiles and generally very messy) so I no longer recommend the in-place upgrade from Windows 7/8. I use the in-place upgrade TS now for W10 to W10 only. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

They are all Win7 SP1 enterprise x64 to Win10 1607 Enterprise x64. I don't think we have applied the KB2952664. When they fail, smsts log always gives me an error code that relates to generic application incompatibility, but again, I've taken the computers that the in-place will fail on, rerun

[mssms] RE: Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

Are you going win10 to win10 or win7 to win10? Have you applied KB2952664 if they are Windows 7. I have had a lot of flakiness with win7 to win10 upgrades recently. Clean VM's built a few would work, more than a few would fail. Task sequence wouldn't fail, it would just get stuck. Could be

RE: [mssms] Does On-Premises MDM require Intune subscriptions for each device?

Setting up hybrid Intune is very doable, but seems like massive overkill for a few Surface Hubs that are on Prem. Meraki doesn’t help? You need a license for each user, and they can have up to 15 devices. I don’t think there is any point in using Intune with SCCM for on premise only Windows

[mssms] Windows 10 In-Place Upgrade Failures

Has anyone experienced high failure rates with Windows 10 in-place upgrade Task Sequence deployments? I've been rolling Windows 10 out to our organization and am trying to leverage the in-place upgrade TS to save money and time. I've had the in-place configured and working for a couple of

[mssms] Does On-Premises MDM require Intune subscriptions for each device?

Background: We just purchased a few Surface Hubs, and I'm reading up on management options for them. It seems that they don't apply group policy or support installing the traditional sccm client, they have to be managed using MDM functionality. We use Meraki currently for MDM, but I was reading

[mssms] RE: Network Access Account - restricted logon to with server in the list and unknown OSD Fails..

Actually opened a ticket and sent logs off to Microsoft. The event viewer even 4625 “an account failed to log on” “User not allowed to logon at this computer” This server is clearly listed in the logon to list. As soon as they change it to be allowed to log in to all domain computers it

[mssms] RE: Configuration baseline possible for %localappdata% content?

Neat little feature, never knew CIs did that. Looks like it would work. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:03 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: