, 2014 4:57 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
Check the slide before the last one, App-V has some progress to make but is far
from the worst.
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
What exactly do you want to get out of it?
You have many apps, many conflicting ones, or is it the speed?
I see it as managing two infrastructures doing similar things. I wouldn't
bother until there is a real
Pull the Marcum, and ask them to see their laptop's control panel...check if
they are running ConfigMgr. ;)
Mike D-
From: john.bu...@bellaliant.ca
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:47:46
#classic
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Mike Dzikowski
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
Pull the Marcum, and ask
I haven't used it, but they certainly don't have 99% of the market share for
systems management. Last I heard ConfigMgr has something like 70% market share
there.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Burke, John
Sent: Thursday, December 4,
I heard ConfigMgr had 85% at MMS. :)
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:09 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS
Ratliff
Sent: December 4, 2014 3:15 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
I heard ConfigMgr had 85% at MMS. :)
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Murray
: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
I haven't used it, but they certainly don't have 99% of the market share for
systems management. Last I heard ConfigMgr has something like 70% market share
there.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad
virtual applications and
managing those.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: December 4, 2014 3:15 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
I
]
On Behalf Of Burke, John
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014 20:34
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
but what about when it comes to the vm space. I'm guessing they were not
talking about management and more about just virtual
@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
I heard ConfigMgr had 85% at MMS. :)
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Thursday
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
Maybe, but check out licensing. You're not just allowed to just virtualize IE,
even if they do it, it may break licensing.
Actually I wouldn't compare VM and CM at all, different solution
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
John
I take it you are talking about app-v v VMware app virtualisation and managing
of that. Yes IE can be virtualised with the VMware technology but honestly why
bother.
Here's a cool round up of app v
: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
That is pretty great. Thanks.
So the app-v stuff or Microsofts product is lacking by the looks of things.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014 21:55
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM
2012?
Check the slide before the last one, App-V has some progress to make but is
far from the worst.
Daniel Ratliff
From
...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Burke, John
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014 21:21
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM
2012?
That is pretty great. Thanks.
So the app-v stuff or Microsofts product is lacking by the looks
...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Burke, John
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014 21:21
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM
2012?
That is pretty great. Thanks.
So the app-v stuff or Microsofts product is lacking by the looks
?
Cheers
Steve
From: john.bu...@bellaliant.ca
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012?
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:07:50 +
That does help thanks.
It almost seems like we are making a mistake if we go down this road.
Do we
18 matches
Mail list logo
