[mssms] CM12 modifying evaluation cycles

2013-10-03 Thread Sherry Kissinger
Question: Software Deployment Evaluation Cycle (in Default Client Agent): we've set that from the default to daily.  There is an internal line of business who is (because this is new from Configmgr 07, Application deployments) very concerned that long term, this will be detrimental to the end

RE: [mssms] CM12 modifying evaluation cycles

2013-10-03 Thread Stuart Watret
10 minutes - oh yea Stuart Watret Offshore - IT Ltd From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Sherry Kissinger [slkissin...@sbcglobal.net] Sent: 03 October 2013 13:04 To: mssms Subject: [mssms] CM12 modifying

[mssms] SCCM 2012 Link to Computer Details

2013-10-03 Thread Jones, David - Indianapolis
In SCCM 2007 reporting you could link a report to Link to Computer Details by the computer name. Is there an equivalent in 2012? Dave

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 Link to Computer Details

2013-10-03 Thread Garth Jones
no there is not, but i was looking into how to do this. Sent from my LG window smart phone, sorry for the shortness . -Original Message- From: Jones, David - Indianapolis Sent: 10/3/2013 8:34 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012 Link to Computer Details In SCCM

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 Link to Computer Details

2013-10-03 Thread Eswar Koneti
Linking is possible but you will have to create one for computer resource details and link it. You can do it using visual studio easily. Sent From Galaxy Note, please excuse any typo's as result. --- Original Message --- From: Jones, David - Indianapolis dkjo...@wiley.com Sent: October 3, 2013

Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 Link to Computer Details

2013-10-03 Thread Sherry Kissinger
I don't know if there is a default equivilent.  I use this one:  http://www.madisonusergroup.com/2012/11/28/octobernovember-2012-meeting-notes/   Sherry Kissinger Microsoft MVP - ConfigMgr mofmas...@myitforum.com From: Jones, David - Indianapolis

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 Link to Computer Details

2013-10-03 Thread Jones, David - Indianapolis
You mean create a report that looks like “link to computer details” in SCCM 2007. I can make reports but nothing that complicated. “Link to computers details” in SCCM 2007 is not a report, it’s some kind of everything view. Dave From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[mssms] Cleaning up SCCM updates

2013-10-03 Thread Brian McDonald
How do you clean up automatic updates in SCCM? What I mean by that is, my job is now 20gig worth of patches. There has to be a way to clean that up. Thanks! Brian

RE: [mssms] RE: Software Updates Deployment Details Report

2013-10-03 Thread Marcum, John
That report is really messy looking for one. For two I didn't tell the entire story I set out to edit that report to get what I actually want but I can't figure it out because it has a bunch of stuff in there I don't need. If I could get a simple report that has just the three things I

Re: [mssms] Cleaning up SCCM updates

2013-10-03 Thread Harjit Dhaliwal
Here you go! http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2012/04/12/software-update-content-cleanup-in-system-center-2012-configuration-manager.aspx -Harjit On 10/3/2013 10:05 AM, Brian McDonald wrote: How do you clean up automatic updates in SCCM? What I mean by that is, my job is now

Re: [mssms] Windows Embedded sysprep - The system is not fully installed

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Owen
Have you tried changing the scratch file size? I'm sorry, but I don't actually have any Windows Embedded experience. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:00 PM, James Hill falc...@gmail.com wrote: Continuing on my journey down the road of SCCM and windows embedded I’ve come across several issues but

RE: [mssms] Cleaning up SCCM updates

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Leuthold
FYI - If you are running 2012 SP1, this slick solution is no longer required. The blog post refers to 2012 RTM. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7f627744-364a-42ee-9f48-8e1867feaef3/removing-expired-and-superseded-updates Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:10:38 -0400 From:

RE: [mssms] RE: Software Updates Deployment Details Report

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Leuthold
Had to do something similar to show compliance of all deployed SUG's. Change the where clause to limit results based on collection instead of deployment ID. From: jmar...@babc.com To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Software Updates Deployment Details Report Date: Thu, 3 Oct

RE: [mssms] RE: Software Updates Deployment Details Report

2013-10-03 Thread Marcum, John
This is for my change requests... I need to show all updates that are targeting the machines. Your suggestion would work well. Can you send me that rdl or the SQL? John Marcum Sr. Desktop Architect Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

[mssms] Supersedence working as intended?

2013-10-03 Thread Ryan
So we have Adobe Air 3.6 set up as an application and deployed to a collection with all systems in it as required. We also have Adobe Air 3.7 set up as an application that supersedes and replaces 3.6, deployed as required to our pilot collection. Adobe Air 3.7 installed correctly on systems in

[mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Poling
I am at a site where clients are unable to download content from a DP. THe datatransferservice.log shows: Successfully sent location services HTTP failure message. DataTransferService 10/3/2013 11:36:21 AM 4532 (0x11B4) Error sending DAV request. HTTP code 600, status '' DataTransferService

RE: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Leuthold
Firewall? Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jeff Polingmailto:jeffpol...@yahoo.com Sent: ‎10/‎3/‎2013 11:47 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] DP Issue I am at a site where clients are unable to download content from

RE: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Jones, David - Indianapolis
PKI cert/HTTPS? Prestaged checked in DP settings? David Jones Sr. Analyst-Enterprise Desktop Standards Global Infrastructure Services Wiley 10475 Crosspoint Blvd Indianapolis, IN 46256 U.S. www.wiley.com T +1 317 572 3409 dkjo...@wiley.commailto:dkjo...@wiley.com

RE: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread James Massardo
If you get on the console of one of the clients, can you browse to http://configmgrsrv.mydomain.edu/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/AAA00026 ? Thanks, James Massardo From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:46 AM

[mssms] Creating a replica of production in a lab

2013-10-03 Thread Andrew Berges
Hello All, With the final version of CM2012 R2 on the verge of release, I'm preparing to add SP1 and R2 to my current CM2012 production environment. In the past moving from 2003 to 2007, I built new hardware in the lab and restored the prod database from backup, (which was far from optimal,

Re: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread CESAR.ABREG0 .
Check iis role, features and proper configuration of webdav IIS security could have and affect on client downloads On Oct 3, 2013 9:46 AM, Jeff Poling jeffpol...@yahoo.com wrote: I am at a site where clients are unable to download content from a DP. THe datatransferservice.log shows:

Re: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Poling
It's a vanilla IIS install. . .I even removed the role and allowed ConfigMgr to install and configure IIS when I re-installed the DP role. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:51 PM, CESAR.ABREG0 . elsal...@gmail.com wrote: Check iis role, features and proper configuration of webdav IIS security could

Re: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Poling
Browsing to the URL from the client results in a page cannot be displayed. If I do a wireshark capture on the client, all I see are SYNs and not a complete conversation. . . definitely something in the network infrastructure. I am trying to get access to the team who handles taht to assist. On

RE: [mssms] Creating a replica of production in a lab

2013-10-03 Thread Mark Mears
Restoring a site backup would be the best alternative to ensure you got all objects replicated correctly. Thanks, Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.commailto:mark.me...@cireson.com%0d Phone: (757) 945-2651

RE: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Mark Mears
Identify what network devices exist on the links between the site and the DP and see if anything might be altering or filtering that traffic. Thanks, Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.commailto:mark.me...@cireson.com%0d Phone: (757) 945-2651

Re: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Ryan
Weird, we just started getting this same issue at our east coast location... Same errors in the log files. Just that location though. I'll let you know if we figure this out. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Jeff Poling jeffpol...@yahoo.com wrote: It's a vanilla IIS install. . .I even removed

RE: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Mark Mears
Sounds like time for a blog post to me! Thanks, Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.commailto:mark.me...@cireson.com%0d Phone: (757) 945-2651 [cid:image001.png@01CEAC8E.61A72300]http://www.cireson.com/

[mssms] AUTO: Dunn, Paul is out of the office. (returning 2013-10-16)

2013-10-03 Thread PDunn
I am out of the office until 2013-10-16. I will be checking emails periodically if you need to contact me. Note: This is an automated response to your message RE: [mssms] DP Issue sent on 10/3/2013 3:54:53 PM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

Re: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Ryan
The steps to fix were restarting the IIS service, and then starting the SMS DP Pool also, since that didn't restart when we restarted the service. I'll see if I can recreate this in the lab and then will probably make a post with nice pictures. Based on the steps Jeff said he did, I doubt this

[mssms] 403 - Forbidden

2013-10-03 Thread Beardsley, James
I'm in the process of configuring HTTPS and we're using a TMG to do the SSL bridging. In my IIS logs, I'm seeing 403.16's and 403.7's. (Note: MP is WS2012) IP of MP GET /SMS_MP/.sms_aut mplist2DHG 443 - IP of PC

[mssms] SCCM 2012 Branch Cache And Pull Distribtution Points

2013-10-03 Thread Boseman, Marcia H - Raleigh, NC
Has anyone used Branch Cache and Pull Distribution Points in SCCM 2012 with workstations or servers successfully? If so, what type of SCCM environment do you have.

Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 Branch Cache And Pull Distribtution Points

2013-10-03 Thread Albert Kirkpatrick
I have used both, although I prefer 1E NOMAD to Branch cache. I had a client with 3 remote locations, 300+ clients each and no servers.  Implemented Nomad works like a charm for deployments. From: Boseman, Marcia H - Raleigh, NC marcia.h.bose...@usps.gov To:

Re: [mssms] DP Issue

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Poling
Well, I believe I successfully narrowed it down to a network configuration issue. As it turns out there are multiple networks (unclear if they are vLANs or phsyically separate networks). I did the following: 1. Accessed the DP URL from a PC on the Lab network - failed with a timeout/page

RE: [mssms] CU3, agent installation issue

2013-10-03 Thread Carey, Andrew
We are seeing this as well in our test environment and have opened a case with Microsoft. Our initial findings are that this occurs when you attempt to install the SCCM client on a server which also host the management point role. We were able to work around the issue (as proof of concept) by

RE: [mssms] OT: MMS absorbed into TechEd 2014

2013-10-03 Thread Ed Aldrich
Begs the question of standing up more/easier/cheaper “remote” options, content, labs, etc... From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Leuthold Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:21 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms]

RE: [mssms] CU3, agent installation issue

2013-10-03 Thread s kissel
That's great if it's a primary. :) However, the Remove Role option is greyed out for the Management Point on Secondary site servers. I haven't yet found a way to make it work. -S From: agca...@ufl.edu To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] CU3, agent installation issue Date: Thu, 3

[mssms] Restart countdown for Endpoint Protection?

2013-10-03 Thread Murray, Mike
It appears that when Endpoint Protection installs as part of an ADR, the user is required to restart within 15 minutes. I'd like to be able to modify that time, a la software updates. Is this possible? Best Regards, Mike Murray Desktop Management Coordinator - IT Support Services California

[mssms] Direct membership add of a new device record taking long time in SCCM 2012.

2013-10-03 Thread Richard Zuraff
During our imaging process we add a new computer to a single collection as a direct member. From there we than move it to a imaging collection. We are noticing since moving to SCCM 2012 it taking a long time before the records will show up in that collection. In 2007 it would show up in a

Re: [mssms] Direct membership add of a new device record taking long time in SCCM 2012.

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Poling
I've seen this before and updating the membership on All Systems fixes it. Though updating All Systems might have an impact depending on how many devices are in your environment. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Richard Zuraff richard.zur...@genmills.comwrote: During our imaging process we add

Re: [mssms] Direct membership add of a new device record taking long time in SCCM 2012.

2013-10-03 Thread Ryan
That makes sense... Most collections are going to be limited to All Systems, so if the new record isn't in all collections yet it won't be added. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Jeff Poling jeffpol...@yahoo.com wrote: I've seen this before and updating the membership on All Systems fixes it.

Re: [mssms] Direct membership add of a new device record taking long time in SCCM 2012.

2013-10-03 Thread Richard Zuraff
So if we add the machine to the all systems first than the other collection. Would you think this would speed up the process? On Oct 3, 2013, at 10:47 PM, Ryan ryan2...@gmail.commailto:ryan2...@gmail.com wrote: That makes sense... Most collections are going to be limited to All Systems, so

Re: [mssms] Direct membership add of a new device record taking long time in SCCM 2012.

2013-10-03 Thread Ryan
My guess is this order is happening: 1) Computer record is created 2) Task sequence creates direct membership rule for computer 3) Collection refreshes because of the new rule, but limiting collection is all systems and computer isn't there yet so it isn't added 4) Computer is added to the All