Which apps and which defaults specifically? Everyone can benefit from y'all
giving details.
Also, submit this to Microsoft. Mr. Niehaus has publicly stated that these
types of issues are officially bugs and are items that Microsoft needs to fix.
And they have been fixing them - each and every
Nice find Russ – it would make too much sense to actually put that on the page
that client setting page in the documentation. Guess I’ll add it ☺
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:34 PM
go with at least 20 gb, to be sure it 'wont' fail for that specific reason,
but for laughs I did some tests and managed to get the upgrade to start
with as low as ~6gb free, it seems as if the '20 gb requirement' is dynamic
as we got different results on different vm's and couldn't get it to
I asked the same question a couple months ago, and was told yes, 20 GB is
required regardless of deployment method.
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of jeff.carr...@wellsfargo.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 2:05 PM
To:
I do not know for sure but, knowing how MS is, my assumption is the first limit
to get hit. If you have 5120 free on the client plus at least 20% free space
on the disk after 5120 is taken, the cache size will be 5120. If you hit less
than 20% before the cache gets to 5120, the cache will not
It should be based on the value specified at client installation for the
SMSCACHEFLAGS property where you can specify PERCENTDISKSPACE or
PERCENTFREEDISKSPACE. If you’ve specified neither, then it defaults to max size.
See SMSCACHEFLAGS at
According to the link below, the disk space requirements for windows 10 upgrade
is 20 GB for 64bit machines. Does anyone know if this changes with using CM
Task Sequence, with the consideration of caching it first locally?
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-specifications
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/clients/manage/manage-clients#BKMK_ClientCache
“Cache is adjusted to whichever size is less.”
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew Sanders
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:24 PM
To:
We are doing exactly what Coreland stated. Our Win 10 clients are all on 1511
CBB currently but we will not upgrade them to 1607 due to apps and defaults
being reset. All of our 1511 clients will be upgraded to the Creators Update
when it is released to CBB. When we do deploy the Creators
In ConfigMgr CB, these options exist for controlling cache size in client
settings:
[image: Inline image 1]
Which setting takes precedence, size or percentage? For instance, if I have
a 100GB hard drive and I set the size to 10,000MB, but set the percentage
to 1% (1,000MB), which wins? I can't
Sol:
I think you've started on the track Microsoft recommends and changing horses
mid-stream may not net you anything. Organizationally, we supply both LTSB/CBB
images. For Surface(tm) Devices, CBB with the Windows Store Enabled is a must
(we rip out the fluff apps though). For research boxes
The other complaint was "no access to Store". We deploy a fat image with
software added. I developed everything last year. This year my techs are
"building a better mouse trap". We'll see how things turn out.
One of the things I liked about the LTSB was the 10 year life span. Feature and
FYI
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msrc/2017/02/14/february-2017-security-update-release/
Keep in mind that future chipsets may not support your currently deployed LTSB
build and may have to wait for the next one. So if you are planning hardware
refresh in the next 12-24 months, you may have support issues. See link below.
Thanks Wendell. I'm curious... If that was your only complaint then why move
to the Education CB or CBB? I believe the education version puts you in the
same situation for updating etc...
Sol
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Wendell
Hi Sol,
I deployed Enterprise LTSB last year. The biggest complaint was not having
"Camera". This year we're deploying Education and haven't decided on a service
plan (CB or CBB).
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent:
I'm seeing some odd behavior where if I delete a client record from the site
server; the client still active on device gets rejected when trying to connect
again. I don't recall having this issue on SCCM 2012 R2, but my CB 1610
running in mixed mode is rejecting it saying the administrator
Microsoft pushes CBB for most environments pretty hard. The fact that we
are still having this conversation means that something still isn't ideal
for us. When 1511 CBB does go EoL, yes, Microsoft will stop publishing
updates for it. The big issue, as you state, is the interruption this
update
All:
I have been doing a lot of reading over the last several weeks and I still
haven't come to a conclusion on which direction I want to go in regards to
which Windows 10 version I should install in the coming months. I currently
have 1800 laptops on 1511 CBB, and will be upgrading these
19 matches
Mail list logo
