Have a look at the Content Library Explorer (part of the ConfigMgr 2012 R2
Toolkit). Anoop has a good blog on it here.
http://anoopcnair.com/2013/12/18/configmgr-sccm-2012-r2-tool-contcontentlibraryexplorerent-library-explorer/
It will allow you to browse the DPs and marks packages as INVALID
You get a deliberate error when you try to install both.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: 15 September 2014 23:59
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Intune and CM
No, they are mutually exclusive. Why
!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerry Hampson
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:19 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Intune and CM
You get a deliberate
It's a fantastic technology and works pretty much out of the box for Windows 8.
Windows 7 is a little more involved and requires certificates for the second
factor of authentication.
I have a guide to implementing DirectAccess here. It's reasonably
straightforward.
clients are Windows 7, are they a headache to setup or just a
little more involved compared to Win8?
Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Gerry
What's the supposed security risk Niall?
Original message
From: Niall Brady
Date:22/09/2014 19:18 (GMT+00:00)
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] DCR pressing F8 in boot media to optionally prompt for
credentials (much like PXE password is optional)
filed on
this by the Product Group and they confirmed that it is classified as a
security risk... so don't be surprised when the next RAP you are at points this
out... where previously they did not.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Gerry Hampson
gerry.hamp...@ergogroup.iemailto:gerry.hamp...@ergogroup.ie wrote
...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerry Hampson
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:23 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: OT: DirectAccess
Just a little more involved - requires PKI. Implement the solution and test on
Windows 8 first. Then add the Windows 7
Is there any information on the product being updated Jason? I currently have a
customer looking at a direct compete between LANDESK (incumbent) and ConfigMgr.
The techs on the ground are looking for reasons not to switch (they don't want
to learn the new technology). This is one of the issues
It's for any devices managed by the Intune integration Daniel. Previously it
was talking too long for devices to receive their policies. This hotfix has
helped.
Gerry
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: 09 October
I had this problem and was able to solve it as follows:
http://gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie/2013/07/failed-to-sync-update-error-microsoft.html
I never heard of anyone having the exact same problem that I had (I had a
Windows 2012 Primary Site Server that I hadn’t been able to patch).
Gerry
I’ve always embraced the policy that I can use the database for System Center
integrated products – MDT, SUSDB, MBAM. Am I skating on thin ice with that?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: 18 November 2014 19:58
To:
Done Niall
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: 08 December 2014 13:53
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] pls vote it up - Console should show newer version available
and allow upgrade
please vote it up ! (see
Geoff, the updates will install during the first maintenance windows AFTER the
deadline is reached.
Regards,
Gerry
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey
Sent: 09 December 2014 17:24
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject:
There isn't really much to consider Criselda. You pretty much have servers on
the other end of a VPN. You'll have to create a boundary for them and add to a
boundary group for content location. You can also use the boundary group for
site assignment (or manually install the client and designate
pricing will work for bandwidth for software updates,
software ETC from the primary site to Azure VMs.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Gerry Hampson
gerry.hamp...@ergogroup.iemailto:gerry.hamp...@ergogroup.ie wrote:
There isn’t really much to consider Criselda. You pretty much have servers
] On Behalf Of Gerry Hampson
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 5:58 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Managing Azure servers in SCCM2012
There isn't really much to consider Criselda. You pretty much have servers on
the other end of a VPN. You'll
No, but you could implement a GPO to force log off for RDP sessions after a
period of inactivity.
Gerry
Original message
From: Timothy Ransom
Date:17/02/2015 23:45 (GMT+00:00)
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] patching reboot delayed on servers if admin is logged
Some talent on that list Niall ☺
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: 01 April 2015 20:01
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Microsoft Intune Survival Guide now live!
here's the Intune one ;-)
You obviously need to license your clients as well. You need a Server
Management license for server OSes and a Client Management license for desktop
OSes. There is a big difference in cost.
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Jun 2016, at 21:03, David McSpadden
>
Use wusa.exe - unique command depending on the patch name
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/934307/description-of-the-windows-update-standalone-installer-in-windows
Using this is a long way from automation though.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I ran into difficulties with a few customers (duplicate profiles and generally
very messy) so I no longer recommend the in-place upgrade from Windows 7/8. I
use the in-place upgrade TS now for W10 to W10 only.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
There is a cracker coming out early next year John
https://www.amazon.com/Configuration-Manager-Unleashed-Content-Program/dp/0672337908/ref=sr_1_2?s=books=UTF8=1475769324=1-2
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Nov 2016, at 16:53, Garth Jones
> wrote:
It’s perfectly safe to run the PoSh script in production to access the fast
ring. Many organizations have done it. However 1610 will eventually be
available to all – eta not yet known but should be soon enough.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
It's the latter John and yes, it's a poor experience.
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Dec 2016, at 13:16, Marcum, John
> wrote:
Currently we are almost 100% desktops in my environment. We want to start
transitioning over to laptops next year. We do
I saw that also. The true status doesn't seem to reflected in that view.
However if you go back to "Updates and Servicing" you will see that the hotfix
has been installed successfully.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: 03
You have to add a legacy NIC to be able to PXE boot Hyper-V VMs.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 05 January 2017 08:33
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: OSD - WinPE Boot Problem Error
That’s not the case Bob. If you are using ConfigMgr and you are on the CBB
track. then you want ConfigMgr to be in charge of feature updates (via in-place
upgrade TS for example). If you or your user check this box then that changes.
You have introduced a “dual scan” scenario whereby the client
unreliable results in that scenario?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerry Hampson
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 8:31 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Su
That's just a term MS use for early technology adoption.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc627315.aspx
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: 06 March 2017 17:24
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms]
You need this GPO. For now it’s the only thing that solves this problem.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D33EC7.7701FF70]
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: 06 October 2017 17:04
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; Patch Management
31 matches
Mail list logo