[mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files

[Kamerman, Sol]

I upgraded to 1706 a few weeks back.  I enabled express updates and I am not 
seeing the express folders being created when downloading the patches.   I have 
made all of the modifications necessary including the client settings and it 
doesn’t appear to be working correctly even with the latest build and client.  
Is anyone else seeing this?  Are the certain conditions that have to be met in 
order for this to work?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Corkill, Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, 12 September, 2017 6:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files


Hi all,

Do we know if this is fixed now in 1706? I’ve held off enabling express updates 
and now that we’re on 1706 I’ll enable it if it’s working obviously.

Daniel.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2017 8:11 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files

Not really a ‘bug’ – just a lack of understanding how BITS works by whoever 
wrote that piece..

‘Should be fixed in the 1706 Production release although it’s still broken in 
the TP.

Can’t speak for WSUS standalone – but don’t think Express updates apply to Win7 
anyway?

I’ve seen various threads complaining about performance though – so I would 
wait a while before enabling this again.

Phil

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 20 July 2017 18:57
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files


This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to 
be. Learn about spoofing

Feedback

Should be fixed in the next version of ConfigMgr. Known issue.

Basically you get a BITS job for each “delta” in the patch, making it very 
slow… look at it as “free” bandwidth management! 

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Fast, David D.
Sent: den 20 juli 2017 17:48
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files

Is this “bug” specific to the SCCM SUP implementation of Express Updates?  We 
recently enabled Express Updates on our WSUS server (servicing mainly W7 OS), 
and I am less than impressed on the results.  It seems that clients take longer 
to download/install updates now than they did before.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mead, Renae (DTMB)
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 9:19 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files

We are having issues getting Windows 10 distributed to slower sites, so we 
reached out to Microsoft, which suggested using Express updates. We turned it 
on and during testing experienced severe performance issues. It took 40 hours 
to download and install patches using Express Updates. Another machine on the 
same subnet, same DP, NOT using express updates took 15 minutes to download, 
install, and reboot. Not to mention the package grew from 4GB to 24 GB.

We reached out to Microsoft with our testing results and expressed our 
concerns; they confirmed “there was a bug that they found that causes clients 
to create numerous BITS jobs (one for each byte range for the deltas to the 
package).  Each of those jobs has it's own overhead, and latency amplifies 
that.” They did confirm the fix for express updates is in escrow for the next 
Current Branch release, which should be in the next month or so.

As others have stated Express updates are not ready for prime-time.

Thanks,
Renae Mead
DTMB IS OA Enterprise Services
mea...@michigan.gov
(517) 636-0761 Office
(517) 388-2737 Mobile

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 10:11 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] 1702 Express Install Files

Is anyone using this feature in SCCM 1702? I was really looking forward to 
getting this up and running after the 1702 upgrade but I am a little 
disappointed with the results I am seeing.

I understand the initial download is larger and I am okay with that, my patch 
package jumped from 13.1GB to nearly 44GB so the 2-3X size increase was pretty 
accurate. My issue is the time that it is taking to install the cumulative 
update, it is taking almost 3+ hours on my test machines. The machines are all 
W10 1607 

[mssms] Update: RE: August updates not required...

[Kamerman, Sol]

Ok, I am beginning to think something is wrong.  I have 347 Windows 1607 
systems.  Some were deployed last month and was able to receive the last 
Cumulative update in July.  Now, with the August updates the systems are coming 
up as not required when it should be required.  I checked the Deferupgrade 
settings and this is set to off so it should be checking in and saying that it 
is required.  I am stumped.  Log files look okay.  Does anyone have any ideas 
or log files I should check?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:30 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] August updates not required...

All:

Has anyone else noticed that a lot of the updates released this month such as 
1607 cumulative updates and Flash Player updates are not required for many 
systems?  For example, KB4034658 is not required for 347 systems and only 6 
required.  The patch FLASH patch 4034662 is only required for 6 machines and 
not required for 304 of my 1607 systems.  Is anyone else seeing this?  I am 
beginning to think something is not right, but wanted to check here first 
before I start really digging into this.  I have checked log files both on 
servers and clients and everything appears to be normal.

-Sol

[mssms] August updates not required...

[Kamerman, Sol]

All:

Has anyone else noticed that a lot of the updates released this month such as 
1607 cumulative updates and Flash Player updates are not required for many 
systems?  For example, KB4034658 is not required for 347 systems and only 6 
required.  The patch FLASH patch 4034662 is only required for 6 machines and 
not required for 304 of my 1607 systems.  Is anyone else seeing this?  I am 
beginning to think something is not right, but wanted to check here first 
before I start really digging into this.  I have checked log files both on 
servers and clients and everything appears to be normal.

-Sol

[mssms] RE: Help! WSUS maintenance, DB reindex?

[Kamerman, Sol]

I ran into this a few weeks ago.  There was a lot that needed to be done, but 
once completed everything came back to normal.  I increased memory pool, 
throttled the CPU (35%) so I can at least work on the server and clean things 
up.  The WSUS cleanup wizard would crash all the time, but keep doing it until 
it runs all the way through.  I also found that some of the scripts for db 
cleanup and indexing for the WSUS DB worked well.  Also, if you are adding a 
bunch of new systems like I was, the scans was killing the server... A 
combination of all of these things were causing problems. Also, check your 
event viewer log files to see if the services in the WSUS app pool are failing. 
 This was happening to me and my systems we always trying to scan which also 
was a contributing factor to performance issues.

Good luck with this, I took me about 3 days to get everything back to normal.  
Reach out to me directly if you need any help.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Mike Murray
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 5:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Help! WSUS maintenance, DB reindex?

Hello,

CM2012 R2 SP1 (yes, we're upgrading soon)

Our MP that hosts WSUS is really taking a performance hit lately. RAM was 
running almost 100% constantly at one point, we were able to add more RAM and 
dedicate a chunk of it to the WSUS pool in IIS. Now the CPU is pegging. It's 
all the WSUS pool in IIS. I tried limiting the CPU usage setting, but it's 
still running really high.

I would like to know if some has a definitive guide for cleaning up the WSUS DB 
and possibly reindexing it to hopefully clear up some of these issues? I see a 
lot of results in Google, and I want to play this very safe.

TIA!


Best Regards,

Mike Murray
Desktop Engineer/IT Consultant - IT Support Services
California State University, Chico
530.898.4357
mmur...@csuchico.edu

Remember, Chico State will NEVER ask you for your password via email!
For more information about recognizing phishing scam emails go to: 
http://www.csuchico.edu/isec/basics/spam-and-phishing.shtml

Re: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

[Kamerman, Sol]

First thing I checked, but still nothing.
 
Sol
 

From: <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> on behalf of "Smith, Robert F [US] (ES)" <robert.f.sm...@ngc.com>
Reply-To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" <mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 3:39 PM
To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" <mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book


 

My email went to a spam folder I found it there .
 
 
Robert F. Smith

Enterprise Operations 
Systems Management Infrastructure 
Phone 703-949-2368 
Cell 203-524-2172 
 
 
 


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Nemec, Dale
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: EXT :[mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book


 
Same here.
 

Dale Nemec | Global Architecture & Technology Ops (ESS) | Tektronix
Email: dale.ne...@tektronix.com
 | Web: www.tektronix.com

 


From: 
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 11:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book


 
I signed up this morning to get the book and never received an email.  Can you help?
 
Sol
 


From: 
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FREE SCCM e-book


 
Hi All,
 
After long time, my new e-book about SCCM is ready, you can download it FREE from

https://goo.gl/xBwn3b
 
The e-book has 197 pages, 33 chapters and over 160 PowerShell scripts, so you can automate (almost) all SCCM tasks
 
Regards,
 
 
Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail:
raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880
 
MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael
 
 
 



Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete
 this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of
 a manual signature that is included in any attachment. 
 

[mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

[Kamerman, Sol]

I signed up this morning to get the book and never received an email.  Can you 
help?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FREE SCCM e-book

Hi All,

After long time, my new e-book about SCCM is ready, you can download it FREE 
from https://goo.gl/xBwn3b

The e-book has 197 pages, 33 chapters and over 160 PowerShell scripts, so you 
can automate (almost) all SCCM tasks

Regards,


Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

[mssms] RE: Off Topic: Windows 10 LTSB or CBB

[Kamerman, Sol]

Thanks Wendell.  I'm curious... If that was your only complaint then why move 
to the Education CB or CBB?  I believe the education version puts you in the 
same situation for updating etc...

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Wendell Hutchison
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:46 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Off Topic: Windows 10 LTSB or CBB

Hi Sol,

I deployed Enterprise LTSB last year. The biggest complaint was not having 
"Camera". This year we're deploying Education and haven't decided on a service 
plan (CB or CBB).

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 7:05 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] Off Topic: Windows 10 LTSB or CBB

All:

I have been doing a lot of reading over the last several weeks and I still 
haven't come to a conclusion on which direction I want to go in regards to 
which Windows 10 version I should install in the coming months.  I currently 
have 1800 laptops on 1511 CBB, and will be upgrading these laptops to 1607 CBB 
over the next few weeks.  This is challenging in it of itself because the 
update takes about an hour or more and is extremely disruptive to our 
end-users.  I am fighting with the option to move to Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 
because all of the articles I have read about this particular version and how 
it's designed for mission critical systems i.e. ATM's, or factory type systems. 
 The advantage I see is that I don't have to worry about upgrading these 
systems every 12 to 18 months and the disruption to the user is minimal.  We 
have a total of 3,500 systems consisting or laptops and desktops.  Our laptop 
hardware gets changed out every two years to a new model, and our desktops 
models are every 3 and may possibly change to 2 years.

Here are some questions I have:

Since we have a more aggressive hardware cycle is it worth going to LTSB or 
just stay with CBB?

How are other admins handling the cycle change when they are dealing with many 
systems that will need be updated? Over 3,500 and up to 100K depending on the 
size of your company i.e. disrupting users, on-prem / off-prem?

If we don't care for using the app store or having the Edge browser installed, 
are there any other drawbacks from using LTSB?

Is Microsoft really going to stop creating security updates for 1511 when it 
goes end of life? Are you concerned about this if your company isn't ready to 
go to 1607 and you need stay on 1511 past its life cycle?

Have you made the decision to go to LTSB and not look back?

Any other info you can provide is appreciated.



Thanks,
Sol

[mssms] Off Topic: Windows 10 LTSB or CBB

[Kamerman, Sol]

All:

I have been doing a lot of reading over the last several weeks and I still 
haven't come to a conclusion on which direction I want to go in regards to 
which Windows 10 version I should install in the coming months.  I currently 
have 1800 laptops on 1511 CBB, and will be upgrading these laptops to 1607 CBB 
over the next few weeks.  This is challenging in it of itself because the 
update takes about an hour or more and is extremely disruptive to our 
end-users.  I am fighting with the option to move to Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 
because all of the articles I have read about this particular version and how 
it's designed for mission critical systems i.e. ATM's, or factory type systems. 
 The advantage I see is that I don't have to worry about upgrading these 
systems every 12 to 18 months and the disruption to the user is minimal.  We 
have a total of 3,500 systems consisting or laptops and desktops.  Our laptop 
hardware gets changed out every two years to a new model, and our desktops 
models are every 3 and may possibly change to 2 years.

Here are some questions I have:

Since we have a more aggressive hardware cycle is it worth going to LTSB or 
just stay with CBB?

How are other admins handling the cycle change when they are dealing with many 
systems that will need be updated? Over 3,500 and up to 100K depending on the 
size of your company i.e. disrupting users, on-prem / off-prem?

If we don't care for using the app store or having the Edge browser installed, 
are there any other drawbacks from using LTSB?

Is Microsoft really going to stop creating security updates for 1511 when it 
goes end of life? Are you concerned about this if your company isn't ready to 
go to 1607 and you need stay on 1511 past its life cycle?

Have you made the decision to go to LTSB and not look back?

Any other info you can provide is appreciated.



Thanks,
Sol

RE: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

Adam,

Are you using Bitlocker or MBAM?  I have narrowed it down to being an MBAM 
issue, but not sure if it will show the same issue when Bitlocker is enabled.  
Is it possible to bring this offline?  Not sure if it’s okay to reach out 
directly to someone per the listserv rules.  Maybe we can share what we are 
doing and then contact Microsoft to bring it to their attention if we both have 
same problem.

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:30 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

I would be curious to see whether it is a bug or not.  I'm planning and hoping 
to use the Servicing Method when we start deploying Windows 10.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
All:

I decided to go the Task Sequence route to update the system and so far it has 
been able to install 1607 upgrade.  I am curious as to why it wasn’t working 
using the other method.  I realized after testing the TS route it is much 
better than the other way, but do you think that I should reach out to 
Microsoft to see if this is a bug, or is the other method just not supported 
and that TS is the better way to go?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] 
On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

That’s what I thought.  I didn’t think Bitlocker should interfere with this and 
that the setup/install process should take care of it.





From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Troy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

Regardless of using Feature Update package, Windows 10 Servicing or In-Place 
Upgrade…Windows setup/install process will take care of BitLocker e.g. 
suspend/(re)enable.

No experience with MBAM.

Troy L. Martin | Technical Architect
1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147<tel:(678)%20898-6147> | UK Phone : +44 208 326 
9141<tel:+44%2020%208326%209141>
troy.mar...@1e.com<mailto:troy.mar...@1e.com> | 
www.1e.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs=>

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE=>
 | 
Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI=>
 | 
YouTube<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U=>
 | 
Blogs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=tKrxeysyE64idSmjz1G3NP2ojp9RhRdpv1OljUgTbyg=>
 | 
RSS<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_index.php_feed_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII=>

[1E events banner]<http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events>

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

So, I should not update the system using the Feature Update software package 
with systems that have Bitlocker and do an in-place upgrade using  a task 
sequence?  If I am using MBAM I am assuming this will work the same, correct?

Sol



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myit

UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

All:

I decided to go the Task Sequence route to update the system and so far it has 
been able to install 1607 upgrade.  I am curious as to why it wasn’t working 
using the other method.  I realized after testing the TS route it is much 
better than the other way, but do you think that I should reach out to 
Microsoft to see if this is a bug, or is the other method just not supported 
and that TS is the better way to go?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

That’s what I thought.  I didn’t think Bitlocker should interfere with this and 
that the setup/install process should take care of it.





From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Troy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

Regardless of using Feature Update package, Windows 10 Servicing or In-Place 
Upgrade…Windows setup/install process will take care of BitLocker e.g. 
suspend/(re)enable.

No experience with MBAM.

Troy L. Martin | Technical Architect
1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 | UK Phone : +44 208 326 9141
troy.mar...@1e.com<mailto:troy.mar...@1e.com> | 
www.1e.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs=>

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE=>
 | 
Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI=>
 | 
YouTube<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U=>
 | 
Blogs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=tKrxeysyE64idSmjz1G3NP2ojp9RhRdpv1OljUgTbyg=>
 | 
RSS<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_index.php_feed_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII=>

[1E events banner]<http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events>

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

So, I should not update the system using the Feature Update software package 
with systems that have Bitlocker and do an in-place upgrade using  a task 
sequence?  If I am using MBAM I am assuming this will work the same, correct?

Sol



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Troy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:18 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

If doing In-Place Upgrade, Windows will automatically disable/(re)enable 
BitLocker during the deployment.

Troy L. Martin | Technical Architect
1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 | UK Phone : +44 208 326 9141
troy.mar...@1e.com<mailto:troy.mar...@1e.com> | 
www.1e.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs=>

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE

RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

That’s what I thought.  I didn’t think Bitlocker should interfere with this and 
that the setup/install process should take care of it.





From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Troy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

Regardless of using Feature Update package, Windows 10 Servicing or In-Place 
Upgrade…Windows setup/install process will take care of BitLocker e.g. 
suspend/(re)enable.

No experience with MBAM.

Troy L. Martin | Technical Architect
1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 | UK Phone : +44 208 326 9141
troy.mar...@1e.com<mailto:troy.mar...@1e.com> | 
www.1e.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs=>

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE=>
 | 
Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI=>
 | 
YouTube<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U=>
 | 
Blogs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=tKrxeysyE64idSmjz1G3NP2ojp9RhRdpv1OljUgTbyg=>
 | 
RSS<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_index.php_feed_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII=>

[1E events banner]<http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events>

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

So, I should not update the system using the Feature Update software package 
with systems that have Bitlocker and do an in-place upgrade using  a task 
sequence?  If I am using MBAM I am assuming this will work the same, correct?

Sol



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Troy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:18 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

If doing In-Place Upgrade, Windows will automatically disable/(re)enable 
BitLocker during the deployment.

Troy L. Martin | Technical Architect
1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 | UK Phone : +44 208 326 9141
troy.mar...@1e.com<mailto:troy.mar...@1e.com> | 
www.1e.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs=>

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE=>
 | 
Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI=>
 | 
YouTube<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U=>
 | 
Blogs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeW

[mssms] RE: Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

Yes, I have installed the package to other systems without MBAM and it has 
worked fine that leads me to believe that my SCCM/WSUS is configured correctly.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Phillips, Coreland
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:17 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

Have you deployed 1607 to anything else? The way your email is written makes it 
seem like it is the first time you've had SCCM pull this update down. Have you 
done all the fun things to make WSUS/SCCM ready for the ESD files etc...?
Thanks,
Coreland Campbell Phillips
Sr. Endpoint Administrator - Enterprise Services


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:00 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

All:

Just pinging the group to get some ideas as I am all out.  I am trying to 
upgrade a laptop that currently has W10 1511, I was able to download the 1607 
Feature Update from my SCCM Server (1606, I haven't upgraded to latest Branch 
but will soon).  The test system downloads the file, but when it tries to 
install I get an error code 8x80070490.  I've done a lot of Googling but 
nothing has come of it.   The only thing that has change with that the target 
system is that I have enabled Bitlocker using MBAM 2.5sp1.  Could this be 
causing the patch to fail the install?  I have tried suspending bitlocker but 
still the same error.  I am trying to avoid disabling BL all together, but 
before I do this I thought I would reach out to the group.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Sol Kamerman
Babson College

RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

So, I should not update the system using the Feature Update software package 
with systems that have Bitlocker and do an in-place upgrade using  a task 
sequence?  If I am using MBAM I am assuming this will work the same, correct?

Sol



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Troy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:18 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

If doing In-Place Upgrade, Windows will automatically disable/(re)enable 
BitLocker during the deployment.

Troy L. Martin | Technical Architect
1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 | UK Phone : +44 208 326 9141
troy.mar...@1e.com<mailto:troy.mar...@1e.com> | 
www.1e.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs=>

Facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE=>
 | 
Twitter<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI=>
 | 
YouTube<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U=>
 | 
Blogs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=tKrxeysyE64idSmjz1G3NP2ojp9RhRdpv1OljUgTbyg=>
 | 
RSS<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_index.php_feed_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII=>

[1E events banner]<http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events>

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

I believe this log is created if you’re using a Task Sequence to do the update. 
 I am using the Windows 10 Servicing Feature to update the system.  Will I need 
to use a TS  to update the system to 1607 if I have BL enabled?  Is there 
another log I can provide to help troubleshoot?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

the error means

Element not found.

Source: Windows
-
but without more info (like your smsts.log) it's hard to guess why it's saying 
that, can you attach the log

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
All:

Just pinging the group to get some ideas as I am all out.  I am trying to 
upgrade a laptop that currently has W10 1511, I was able to download the 1607 
Feature Update from my SCCM Server (1606, I haven’t upgraded to latest Branch 
but will soon).  The test system downloads the file, but when it tries to 
install I get an error code 8x80070490.  I’ve done a lot of Googling but 
nothing has come of it.   The only thing that has change with that the target 
system is that I have enabled Bitlocker using MBAM 2.5sp1.  Could this be 
causing the patch to fail the install?  I have tried suspending bitlocker but 
still the same error.  I am trying to avoid disabling BL all together, but 
before I do this I thought I would reach out to the group.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Sol Kamerman
Babson College









Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copy

RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

The update downloads which I can monitor in Software Center, when I click 
Install it spins then fails immediately.  It doesn’t start and displays the 
error I added in first email.

Sol
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 9:36 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

ah ok, gotcha, at what point does it fail exactly ?

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
I believe this log is created if you’re using a Task Sequence to do the update. 
 I am using the Windows 10 Servicing Feature to update the system.  Will I need 
to use a TS  to update the system to 1607 if I have BL enabled?  Is there 
another log I can provide to help troubleshoot?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] 
On Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

the error means

Element not found.

Source: Windows
-
but without more info (like your smsts.log) it's hard to guess why it's saying 
that, can you attach the log

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
All:

Just pinging the group to get some ideas as I am all out.  I am trying to 
upgrade a laptop that currently has W10 1511, I was able to download the 1607 
Feature Update from my SCCM Server (1606, I haven’t upgraded to latest Branch 
but will soon).  The test system downloads the file, but when it tries to 
install I get an error code 8x80070490.  I’ve done a lot of Googling but 
nothing has come of it.   The only thing that has change with that the target 
system is that I have enabled Bitlocker using MBAM 2.5sp1.  Could this be 
causing the patch to fail the install?  I have tried suspending bitlocker but 
still the same error.  I am trying to avoid disabling BL all together, but 
before I do this I thought I would reach out to the group.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Sol Kamerman
Babson College

RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

I believe this log is created if you’re using a Task Sequence to do the update. 
 I am using the Windows 10 Servicing Feature to update the system.  Will I need 
to use a TS  to update the system to 1607 if I have BL enabled?  Is there 
another log I can provide to help troubleshoot?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

the error means

Element not found.

Source: Windows
-

but without more info (like your smsts.log) it's hard to guess why it's saying 
that, can you attach the log

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
All:

Just pinging the group to get some ideas as I am all out.  I am trying to 
upgrade a laptop that currently has W10 1511, I was able to download the 1607 
Feature Update from my SCCM Server (1606, I haven’t upgraded to latest Branch 
but will soon).  The test system downloads the file, but when it tries to 
install I get an error code 8x80070490.  I’ve done a lot of Googling but 
nothing has come of it.   The only thing that has change with that the target 
system is that I have enabled Bitlocker using MBAM 2.5sp1.  Could this be 
causing the patch to fail the install?  I have tried suspending bitlocker but 
still the same error.  I am trying to avoid disabling BL all together, but 
before I do this I thought I would reach out to the group.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Sol Kamerman
Babson College

[mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

[Kamerman, Sol]

All:

Just pinging the group to get some ideas as I am all out.  I am trying to 
upgrade a laptop that currently has W10 1511, I was able to download the 1607 
Feature Update from my SCCM Server (1606, I haven't upgraded to latest Branch 
but will soon).  The test system downloads the file, but when it tries to 
install I get an error code 8x80070490.  I've done a lot of Googling but 
nothing has come of it.   The only thing that has change with that the target 
system is that I have enabled Bitlocker using MBAM 2.5sp1.  Could this be 
causing the patch to fail the install?  I have tried suspending bitlocker but 
still the same error.  I am trying to avoid disabling BL all together, but 
before I do this I thought I would reach out to the group.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Sol Kamerman
Babson College

[mssms] RE: SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

[Kamerman, Sol]

Is the ‘Listen All’ option set to ‘Yes’  Under SQL SERVER NETWORK CONFIG -> 
Protocols FOR *

Change to NO if it is.

I looked through my old notes and that is one of the settings I had to change 
because I had multiple NICS and the comms were messed up.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of s kissel
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:25 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Re: SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port


Is the SQL Browser service started?


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
<listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>> on 
behalf of Duncan McAlynn 
<duncan.mcal...@heatsoftware.com<mailto:duncan.mcal...@heatsoftware.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:55:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

See my last bullet item in the Configuration.

Duncan McAlynn, Solutions Director, Americas
HEAT Software
M: +1.512.391.9111 | 
duncan.mcal...@heatsoftware.com<mailto:duncan.mcal...@heatsoftware.com>
HEAT Software |  490 N McCarthy Blvd. Suite 100 | Milpitas, CA 95035

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 12:51
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

One more thing… When I had this setup, I had to make the SCCM server object an 
ADMINISTRATOR on the SQL box.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Duncan McAlynn
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:32 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

I’m about to go mental over this one! Any help would be greatly appreciated, 
y’all! Thanks in advance.

Configuration:
? New CB1606 site installation on CM01
? Remote SQL 2014 default instance on SQL01
? Both servers are Windows Server 2012 R2. (Fully patched)
? *ALL* SQL IPs are enabled and configured for port 1433
? Setup executed as a Domain Admin
? CM01$ is local admin on SQL01 and SysAdmin in SQL

Issue:
This prerequisite checker fails on the SQL validation. The exact error message 
is: “Configuration Manager primary site and central administration site require 
SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port.”

Relative Log Entries from ConfigMgrPreReq.log:
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server version;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR:Can not get sql instance regkey.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR:Failed to get Sql edition, Sql 
Server:SQL01.patchlink.corp, instance:.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server Edition;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking Tcp is enabled to Static port, SQL 
Server:SQL01.patchlink.corp, Instance:.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR: SQL TCP is not enabled.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server Tcp Port;Error;  
  Configuration Manager primary site and central administration site require 
SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is limited.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> WARN: SQL Server memory is set to unlimited.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Configuration for SQL Server 
memory usage;Warning;SQL Server is configured for unlimited memory 
usage. You should configure SQL Server memory to have a maximum limit.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is configured to 
reserve minimum memory.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Installing the central administration site or 
primary site, requires SQL Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of 
memory.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> WARN: SQL Server minimum memory is 8 MB.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server process memory 
allocation;Warning;Configuration Manager requires SQL Server to reserve 
a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory for the central administration site and 
primary site and a minimum of 4 gigabytes (GB) for the secondary site. This 
memory is reserved by using the Minimum server memory setting under Server 
Memory Options and is configured by using SQL Server Management Studio. For 
more information about how to set a fixed amount of memory, see 
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=233759.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Case-insensitive collation on 
SQL Server;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:

[mssms] RE: SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

[Kamerman, Sol]

One more thing… When I had this setup, I had to make the SCCM server object an 
ADMINISTRATOR on the SQL box.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Duncan McAlynn
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:32 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

I’m about to go mental over this one! Any help would be greatly appreciated, 
y’all! Thanks in advance.

Configuration:

  *   New CB1606 site installation on CM01
  *   Remote SQL 2014 default instance on SQL01
  *   Both servers are Windows Server 2012 R2. (Fully patched)
  *   *ALL* SQL IPs are enabled and configured for port 1433
  *   Setup executed as a Domain Admin
  *   CM01$ is local admin on SQL01 and SysAdmin in SQL

Issue:
This prerequisite checker fails on the SQL validation. The exact error message 
is: “Configuration Manager primary site and central administration site require 
SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port.”

Relative Log Entries from ConfigMgrPreReq.log:
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server version;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR:Can not get sql instance regkey.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR:Failed to get Sql edition, Sql 
Server:SQL01.patchlink.corp, instance:.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server Edition;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking Tcp is enabled to Static port, SQL 
Server:SQL01.patchlink.corp, Instance:.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR: SQL TCP is not enabled.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server Tcp Port;Error;  
  Configuration Manager primary site and central administration site require 
SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is limited.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> WARN: SQL Server memory is set to unlimited.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Configuration for SQL Server 
memory usage;Warning;SQL Server is configured for unlimited memory 
usage. You should configure SQL Server memory to have a maximum limit.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is configured to 
reserve minimum memory.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Installing the central administration site or 
primary site, requires SQL Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of 
memory.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> WARN: SQL Server minimum memory is 8 MB.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server process memory 
allocation;Warning;Configuration Manager requires SQL Server to reserve 
a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory for the central administration site and 
primary site and a minimum of 4 gigabytes (GB) for the secondary site. This 
memory is reserved by using the Minimum server memory setting under Server 
Memory Options and is configured by using SQL Server Management Studio. For 
more information about how to set a fixed amount of memory, see 
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=233759.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Case-insensitive collation on 
SQL Server;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Check Machine FQDN: .
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: getaddrinfo returned success.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Validate FQDN of SQL Server 
Computer;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO:CheckSupportedFQDNFormat 
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: NetBIOS 
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Primary FQDN;Passed


Duncan McAlynn, Solutions Director, Americas
HEAT Software
M: +1.512.391.9111 | 
duncan.mcal...@heatsoftware.com
HEAT Software |  490 N McCarthy Blvd. Suite 100 | Milpitas, CA 95035

[mssms] RE: SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

[Kamerman, Sol]

Did you enabled Named Pipes on the SQL server?  Is there a firewall turn on the 
SQL box?  Turn off if it is and run prereq again see what happens.

Just some thoughts ☺

Also, the recommended install is to install SQL on the same box and everyone on 
the list would agree.  There may be business reasons as to why you can’t so you 
may not be able to.   I had my previous SCCM environment on a remote SQL and it 
was a pain to install and manage.  I moved to same box during my latest upgrade 
to 1606 and it works so much better.  Have you thought about moving to the same 
box?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Duncan McAlynn
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:32 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port

I’m about to go mental over this one! Any help would be greatly appreciated, 
y’all! Thanks in advance.

Configuration:

  *   New CB1606 site installation on CM01
  *   Remote SQL 2014 default instance on SQL01
  *   Both servers are Windows Server 2012 R2. (Fully patched)
  *   *ALL* SQL IPs are enabled and configured for port 1433
  *   Setup executed as a Domain Admin
  *   CM01$ is local admin on SQL01 and SysAdmin in SQL

Issue:
This prerequisite checker fails on the SQL validation. The exact error message 
is: “Configuration Manager primary site and central administration site require 
SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port.”

Relative Log Entries from ConfigMgrPreReq.log:
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server version;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR:Can not get sql instance regkey.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR:Failed to get Sql edition, Sql 
Server:SQL01.patchlink.corp, instance:.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server Edition;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking Tcp is enabled to Static port, SQL 
Server:SQL01.patchlink.corp, Instance:.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> ERROR: SQL TCP is not enabled.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server Tcp Port;Error;  
  Configuration Manager primary site and central administration site require 
SQL Server Tcp is enabled and set to Static port.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is limited.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> WARN: SQL Server memory is set to unlimited.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Configuration for SQL Server 
memory usage;Warning;SQL Server is configured for unlimited memory 
usage. You should configure SQL Server memory to have a maximum limit.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is configured to 
reserve minimum memory.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Installing the central administration site or 
primary site, requires SQL Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of 
memory.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> WARN: SQL Server minimum memory is 8 MB.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;SQL Server process memory 
allocation;Warning;Configuration Manager requires SQL Server to reserve 
a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory for the central administration site and 
primary site and a minimum of 4 gigabytes (GB) for the secondary site. This 
memory is reserved by using the Minimum server memory setting under Server 
Memory Options and is configured by using SQL Server Management Studio. For 
more information about how to set a fixed amount of memory, see 
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=233759.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Case-insensitive collation on 
SQL Server;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: Check Machine FQDN: .
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: getaddrinfo returned success.
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Validate FQDN of SQL Server 
Computer;Passed
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO:CheckSupportedFQDNFormat 
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> INFO: NetBIOS 
<01-04-2017 10:47:35> SQL01.patchlink.corp;Primary FQDN;Passed


Duncan McAlynn, Solutions Director, Americas
HEAT Software
M: +1.512.391.9111 | 
duncan.mcal...@heatsoftware.com
HEAT Software |  490 N McCarthy Blvd. Suite 100 | Milpitas, CA 95035

[mssms] RE: ERROR: failed to delete orphaned content folder

[Kamerman, Sol]

All:

I was able to resolve the issue.  I noticed that the permissions of the share 
and folder were not set correctly for the account that I  am using to connect 
WSUS to SCCM.  I am not sure why it was working fine for the last several 
weeks, but as of now it is able to delete the content folders.

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 7:42 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] ERROR: failed to delete orphaned content folder

All:

I am seeing an error that recently started in the wsyncmgr.log file.  
Everything was working fine a few days ago, and nothing has been changed as far 
as permissions on the server.  I have rebooted to the server and the problem 
reappears.  I have done some googling, but nothing has helped thus far.
Patches are being downloaded still, but it occurs right after the sms cleanup 
phase.


The error is:
Deleting file 
\\?\UNC\sitesccm\patches$\September 
2016 - Microsoft Critical 
Updates\7219a284-56c6-46b7-9306-1eb439c5dff0\ie11-windows6.1-kb3185319-x64.cab, 
FAILED, Win32 Error = 5  SMS_WSUS_SYNC_MANAGER12/7/2016 
7:26:14 AM  4812 (0x12CC)
Failed to delete orphaned content folder 
\\sitesccm\patches$\September 2016 - 
Microsoft Critical Updates\7219a284-56c6-46b7-9306-1eb439c5dff0, error 0x5  
SMS_WSUS_SYNC_MANAGER12/7/2016 7:26:14 AM 4812 (0x12CC)
Deleting file 
\\?\UNC\sitesccm\patches$\September 
2016 - Microsoft Critical 
Updates\bedfbe1e-920f-4247-9333-9bd1b777bebb\windows6.1-kb3178034-x64.cab, 
FAILED, Win32 Error = 5  SMS_WSUS_SYNC_MANAGER
12/7/2016 7:26:14 AM  4812 (0x12CC)
Failed to delete orphaned content folder 
\\sitesccm\patches$\September 2016 - 
Microsoft Critical Updates\bedfbe1e-920f-4247-9333-9bd1b777bebb, error 0x5 
SMS_WSUS_SYNC_MANAGER12/7/2016 7:26:14 AM 4812 (0x12CC)

Has anyone else seen this before?

Thanks for any help you can provide.

Sol

RE: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console

[Kamerman, Sol]

I just tried the script a few minutes ago in my test environment 1606, and 1610 
appeared almost immediately after I checked for updates.

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of the codepoets
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 2:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console

Thanks for the reply Sherry. It's been 2 days since the script was run. Still 
nothing.

Was your lab running 1511 or something newer?

My colleague has told me he's seeing a version check in one of the logs and 
thinks that's what is denying us access to 1610. So I am just trying to confirm 
that we, at 1511, cannot go directly to 1610.

Erik

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Sherry Kissinger 
> wrote:
in my lab; after running the script; I noticed 1610 wasn't there right away 
either.  I don't recall how long it was--I got distracted by production.  by 
the time I got back to the lab it was the next day--and it was there.  You may 
just need to wait longer?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:23 PM, the codepoets 
> wrote:
We have 1511 installed and seemingly working fine in both our LAB and 
Production. I see 1602 and 1606 in both consoles, but not 1610. I know 1511 is 
stated as the minimum, but has anyone confirmed this and done an in console 
upgrade from 1511 to 1610? (And yes, I've already tried running the PowerShell 
script to make the update available with no luck. The script completes fine but 
there is no change in either environment)

Thanks,
Erik



--
Thank you,

Sherry Kissinger

My Parameters:  Standardize. Simplify. Automate
Blogs: http://www.mofmaster.com, http://mnscug.org/blogs/sherry-kissinger, 
http://www.smguru.org

RE: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

[Kamerman, Sol]

Gotcha, issue still stands as to why my Win10 box is not checking as required 
under the ‘All Windows 10 Updates’…  It’s been over 24 hours and still nothing. 
 It does check-in for software updates which is odd.

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:50 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

This changed from ConfigMgr CB 1511 to 1602 I believe which is why you are not 
seeing them. Also, the downloading of all languages was also corrected in 1602 
I believe.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:10 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

Interesting, at first this what I was planning on doing, but I am not seeing 
this in the All Software Updates.  I have selected the appropriate Product 
Classifications and Products to be downloaded and it hasn’t showed up.  I 
applied all patches related to the WSUS issue as well.  Are there any other 
reasons why I’m not seeing in All Software Updates?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Linkey, Mike
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:02 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

I deploy them just like a regular software update.  That way I don’t have all 
of the extra languages and such downloaded.  Working so far on the machine we 
have upgraded.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

I would think you'd need to set your Servicing Options for it to detect and say 
that an update applies/needed to a specific machine...

I may be wrong...

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
I haven’t set up the Servicing Options yet since it’s not reporting that any 
clients require the update at this time.  I am seeing that the Servicing is 
detecting that I have a machine considered ready, I believe this info might be 
coming from the Software Inventory and not the check-in but I could be wrong.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] 
On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:24 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

What have you set for your Servicing Options?  You can choose between CB, CBB, 
etc. with a time delay based on days.  That may be effecting it - not totally 
sure as I haven't played with this yet.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:

All:

I have my test environment setup with the latest CB of SCCM, and I can see the 
'Feature update to Windows 10 Enterprise, version 1607' update listed in the 
‘All Windows 10 Updates’.  However, SCCM is showing zero machines requiring the 
update hours after the deployment took effect.  I've also manually updated the 
client, refreshed the ConfigMgr client machine policy and run update 
scans/deployment evaluations on a couple of Windows 10 Enterprise 1511 
machines.  No machines are detecting the update and displaying it in Software 
Center.

I am at a point where I don’t know what else to look at. Do any of you have 
SCCM successfully upgrading machines to 1607 via the Windows 10 Servicing 
method?

-Sol







CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The e-mail transmission (and/or the documents 
accompanying such) may contain confidential information. Such information is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are 
not the named or intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of such information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error, please notify the sender and then delete the email. Thank 
you for your cooperation.

RE: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

[Kamerman, Sol]

Interesting, at first this what I was planning on doing, but I am not seeing 
this in the All Software Updates.  I have selected the appropriate Product 
Classifications and Products to be downloaded and it hasn’t showed up.  I 
applied all patches related to the WSUS issue as well.  Are there any other 
reasons why I’m not seeing in All Software Updates?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Linkey, Mike
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:02 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

I deploy them just like a regular software update.  That way I don’t have all 
of the extra languages and such downloaded.  Working so far on the machine we 
have upgraded.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [External] Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

I would think you'd need to set your Servicing Options for it to detect and say 
that an update applies/needed to a specific machine...

I may be wrong...

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:
I haven’t set up the Servicing Options yet since it’s not reporting that any 
clients require the update at this time.  I am seeing that the Servicing is 
detecting that I have a machine considered ready, I believe this info might be 
coming from the Software Inventory and not the check-in but I could be wrong.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] 
On Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:24 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

What have you set for your Servicing Options?  You can choose between CB, CBB, 
etc. with a time delay based on days.  That may be effecting it - not totally 
sure as I haven't played with this yet.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:

All:

I have my test environment setup with the latest CB of SCCM, and I can see the 
'Feature update to Windows 10 Enterprise, version 1607' update listed in the 
‘All Windows 10 Updates’.  However, SCCM is showing zero machines requiring the 
update hours after the deployment took effect.  I've also manually updated the 
client, refreshed the ConfigMgr client machine policy and run update 
scans/deployment evaluations on a couple of Windows 10 Enterprise 1511 
machines.  No machines are detecting the update and displaying it in Software 
Center.

I am at a point where I don’t know what else to look at. Do any of you have 
SCCM successfully upgrading machines to 1607 via the Windows 10 Servicing 
method?

-Sol







CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The e-mail transmission (and/or the documents 
accompanying such) may contain confidential information. Such information is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are 
not the named or intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of such information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this email in error, please notify the sender and then delete the email. Thank 
you for your cooperation.

RE: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

[Kamerman, Sol]

I haven’t set up the Servicing Options yet since it’s not reporting that any 
clients require the update at this time.  I am seeing that the Servicing is 
detecting that I have a machine considered ready, I believe this info might be 
coming from the Software Inventory and not the check-in but I could be wrong.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:24 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Windows 10 1607 upgrade issue

What have you set for your Servicing Options?  You can choose between CB, CBB, 
etc. with a time delay based on days.  That may be effecting it - not totally 
sure as I haven't played with this yet.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Kamerman, Sol 
<skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:skamer...@babson.edu>> wrote:

All:

I have my test environment setup with the latest CB of SCCM, and I can see the 
'Feature update to Windows 10 Enterprise, version 1607' update listed in the 
‘All Windows 10 Updates’.  However, SCCM is showing zero machines requiring the 
update hours after the deployment took effect.  I've also manually updated the 
client, refreshed the ConfigMgr client machine policy and run update 
scans/deployment evaluations on a couple of Windows 10 Enterprise 1511 
machines.  No machines are detecting the update and displaying it in Software 
Center.

I am at a point where I don’t know what else to look at. Do any of you have 
SCCM successfully upgrading machines to 1607 via the Windows 10 Servicing 
method?

-Sol

[mssms] can't see KB2919355 in All Software Updates

[Kamerman, Sol]

For some reason I can't see this update in the list.  Before I start checking 
off things on the list I thought I would ask if anyone knows which product I 
need checked to see it.  I can see Windows 8 updates etc... but I might be 
missing something.

Thanks in advance for the help :)

Sol Kamerman
Manager, Client Services and Technical Support
Babson College

[mssms] RE: can't see KB2919355 in All Software Updates

[Kamerman, Sol]

I was thinking the same thing, we may just have to be patient.

-Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Barnes,Chris
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 1:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: can't see KB2919355 in All Software Updates

I don't see it either in WSUS or SCCM. If I point a 2012R2 server directly to 
MU I don't see it either.

I thought I read somewhere that Microsoft was going to roll it out slowly 
today, so perhaps we will need to check back later?


Chris Barnes

Senior Technical Specialist
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Desk:  (248) 648-2528
Cell: (248) 767-4415

[Penske75new]
PENSKECARS.COMhttp://penskecars.com/


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:40 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] can't see KB2919355 in All Software Updates

For some reason I can't see this update in the list.  Before I start checking 
off things on the list I thought I would ask if anyone knows which product I 
need checked to see it.  I can see Windows 8 updates etc... but I might be 
missing something.

Thanks in advance for the help :)

Sol Kamerman
Manager, Client Services and Technical Support
Babson College





Penske Automotive Group and its affiliates will never sell or rent your email 
address in violation of applicable law. This email and any files transmitted 
with it are confidential and intended solely for use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. Please delete all copies if you are not the 
intended recipient.




inline: image001.jpg