Williams
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 5:13 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
if you supersede and select
, 2014 5:20 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
not unless the PG says to fix it.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Marcum, John jmar...@babc.com wrote:
Yes, that's what sustained engineering does. :-)
-Original Message-
From
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 11:50 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
How about fixing the 2 confirmed bugs that make software randomly deploy all
over
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 11:50 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
How about fixing the 2 confirmed bugs that make software randomly deploy all
over
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 3:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Software will randomly install on computers all over the environment.
Desktops, Servers
: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Software will randomly install on computers all over the environment.
Desktops, Servers.. everything. It is nearly impossible to predict when and
where apps will install.
Bug was filed by another company here in Houston in January based
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
How about fixing the 2 confirmed bugs that make software randomly deploy
all over the enterprise? This is costing us hundreds of thousands in
license costs unless we spend a ton of money going and cleaning
, June 10, 2014 1:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
What is the most recent client version? I have 5.00.7958.1104
I get ZERO hits when googling that version.
/Todd
Services - SUNY Buffalo State
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
What
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
you happen to have a link to the update you installed? I am doing something
wrong over here.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
you happen to have a link to the update you installed? I am doing something
wrong over here
Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1
, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Sorry I spoke to soon. That IS from CU1. It's not an auto-client package so
of course it has to be distributed manually.
Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
you happen to have a link to the update you installed? I am doing something
wrong over here.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Kent, Mark ken...@buffalostate.edu
wrote:
I have 5.00.7958.1203, from one post R2 CU1 update.
Mark Kent
: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
yes, and somehow I am at an impossible version number.
Thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov wrote:
http
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Here's what I have. I think the way
Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Here's what I have. I think the way they are doing updates is a confusing
mess.
5.00.7958.1000
5.00.7958.1203
5.00.7711.
5.00.7804.1000
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Brian Huneycutt
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:01 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Having multiple product versions in market at once can definitely make things
...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
IMO Using more unique names for updates would help. I see CU1 for R2
and CU1 for SP1 then I have to think what came first SP1
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
IMO Using more unique names for updates would help. I see CU1 for R2 and
CU1 for SP1 then I have to think what came first SP1 or R2? and so forth.
Next make all client updates use the automatic updates feature rather than just
10, 2014 12:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
+1
Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad
It can be disabled.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:03 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Ya
Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
+1
Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State
-Original Message-
From: listsad
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of SORENSEN, STANLEY
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:35 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
+2
Respectfully,
Stan
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Here's what I have. I think the way they are doing updates is a confusing
mess
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
IMO Using more unique names for updates would help. I see CU1 for R2 and
CU1 for SP1 then I have to think what came first SP1 or R2? and so forth.
Next make all
]
On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
yes, and somehow I am at an impossible version number.
Thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
joseph.hea
He's not a PM... Sustained Engineering
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:43 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1
:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
He's not a PM... Sustained Engineering
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:43
, 2014 4:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
He's not a PM... Sustained Engineering
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10
, 2014 3:56 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Yes, that's what sustained engineering does. :-)
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Tuesday
Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:43 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Are you the only PM interested in improving things?
would you please take over applications and content distribution?
You are taking me back to 2005'ish
-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
He's not a PM... Sustained Engineering
-Original
: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
But maybe he can fix the glitch :-)
Mark Kent (MCP)
Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer
Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State
-Original Message-
From
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Another great feature would
...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Version 5.00.7958.1104 (R2 CU1)
Another great feature would be an in-console check for updates That would
verify if the environemnt and clients
36 matches
Mail list logo
