Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:30 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > I wo

RE: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

ssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker I would be curious to see whether it is a bug or not. I'm planning and hoping to use the Servicing Method when we start deploying Windows 10. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Kamerman, Sol <skamer...@babs

RE: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

Subject: Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker I would be curious to see whether it is a bug or not. I'm planning and hoping to use the Servicing Method when we start deploying Windows 10. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Kamerman, Sol <skamer...@babson.edu<mailto:

Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

I would be curious to see whether it is a bug or not. I'm planning and hoping to use the Servicing Method when we start deploying Windows 10. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Kamerman, Sol wrote: > All: > > > > I decided to go the Task Sequence route to update the system

UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

All: I decided to go the Task Sequence route to update the system and so far it has been able to install 1607 upgrade. I am curious as to why it wasn’t working using the other method. I realized after testing the TS route it is much better than the other way, but do you think that I should