Re: [mssms] Maintenance Windows & Restart Behavior

2017-03-30 Thread Adam Juelich
Thanks, guys. Daniel, how has 1E Nightwatchman been? Our WoL isn't perfect. It has gotten better since I configured compliance settings for NIC Power Management. Since we are smaller they won't do a PoC with us but until I can see proof that this gives us a better success-rate, I can't justify

Re: [mssms] Recommended process for moving SCCM CB to new server?

2017-03-30 Thread Adam Juelich
Just to piggy-back on this. What if the previous Systems Administrator named the server something stupid. How would one then migrate to a new Server with a new naming convention? On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Jason Sandys wrote: > I’ve never had an issue with it rebuilding

Re: [mssms] GPO Update Disable Manual MS checks

2017-03-30 Thread Adam Juelich
Yes, other than the GP setting to 'Disable Automatic Updates,' don't configure anything else related to it. There is the User-Side GP Setting: "Remove access to use all Windows Update features" That should do the trick. On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Daniel Ratliff

RE: [mssms] GPO Update Disable Manual MS checks

2017-03-30 Thread Daniel Ratliff
Never configure any of your windows update settings with GPO, let SCCM handle that via local policy. I believe the setting you want is here for Win10: https://miketerrill.net/2016/10/11/disable-check-online-for-updates-from-microsoft-update-in-windows-10/ For Win7, we just disable the ability

RE: [mssms] Maintenance Windows & Restart Behavior

2017-03-30 Thread Daniel Ratliff
Honestly, hard to say. We have it implemented, but the team that owns it hasn’t started using it. We know the capability is there for full automation, the only prereq we had to do was set the EnablePME reg key to allow WoL on the NIC. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [mssms] UEFI PXE boot HP 650 G3 Probook

2017-03-30 Thread Gannon, Todd
Yes I have. However the x86 never gets used in any task sequence so the drivers don’t get updated for the boot image. v10.0.14393.0. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady Sent: Thursday, 30 March 2017 12:58 PM To:

RE: [mssms] Recommended process for moving SCCM CB to new server?

2017-03-30 Thread Jason Sandys
You wouldn’t – there is no supported method to rename a site server. Who cares what the name is though? Do you really want to perform a week’s worth of work for a name regardless of how stupid it is? I have much better and more productive things to do. Also, while naming conventions are great

[mssms] Query for users with multiple primary devices

2017-03-30 Thread Beardsley, James
Anyone have a SQL query that'll show me all users with more than one primary device assigned to them through UDA? Thanks, James Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. It contains information that is privileged,

[mssms] RE: Query for users with multiple primary devices

2017-03-30 Thread Enley, Carl
You could use this and just filter excel to show the duplicates in the name field? SELECT UMR.MachineResourceID, UMR.MachineResourceName, UMR.UniqueUserName, Mail0 FROM v_R_User U JOIN v_UserMachineRelationship UMR ON UMR.UniqueUserName = U.Unique_User_Name0 I also believe there is a built in

[mssms] RE: Query for users with multiple primary devices

2017-03-30 Thread Garth Jones
This should do the trick. SELECT UMR.MachineResourceID, UMR.MachineResourceName, UMR.UniqueUserName, U.Mail0 FROM dbo.v_R_User U JOIN dbo.v_UserMachineRelationship UMR ON UMR.UniqueUserName = U.Unique_User_Name0 join (SELECT UMR.UniqueUserName as

Re: [mssms] RE: Query for users with multiple primary devices

2017-03-30 Thread Adam Juelich
Wouldn't this be a great feature? ::wink wink:: https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/15040527-option-to-specify-maximum-number-of-primary-device On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Enley, Carl wrote: > You could use this and just filter