Hi all!
There's some uncertainity about g77 in the GNU Compiler Collection
Project, as the lead Fortran developer stoped working on g77 beyond
gcc-2.95 in October 1999. Please check
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/ for further info.
When I tried to compile the PMX source on my linux with g77 I
Hello everyone,
this isn't strictly a MusiXTeX-related question except in the sense
that I've been asked by someone to create some notation extracts to
insert into a Word document. Is there any utility available that will
allow one to convert a page of a DVI file to a graphics format that
Word
Hi Eva,
dvips should do what you want. You can create PostScript (PS)
or Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) with it - at least under
Linux. The latter is achieved by the option "-E" and this
should be what M$-Word can work with.
HTH,
Frank.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello everyone,
this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
this isn't strictly a MusiXTeX-related question except in the sense
that I've been asked by someone to create some notation extracts to
insert into a Word document. Is there any utility available that will
allow one to convert a page of a DVI file
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 05:00:30PM +0100, Keresztfalvi Gabor wrote:
When I tried to compile the PMX source on my linux with g77 I got
segfaults as well, then somebody suggested f2c and the segfaults have gone
away... The debian package of f2c shows the following info:
Christian Mondrup
When I tried to compile the PMX source on my linux with g77 I got
segfaults as well, then somebody suggested f2c and the segfaults have gone
away... The debian package of f2c shows the following info:
Christian Mondrup warned me, that he has problems with f2c and PMX beyond
2.10. Indeed,
Christoph Kukulies wrote
Besides I'd be curious what the problem is. f2c is so mature
that it is unlikely that there is a 'problem' with f2c.
It's more likely there is a problem with the fortran code
not being 100% f77 standard or something.
Thanks to Christoph and others who responded. When
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:01:18AM -0800, Simons, Don wrote:
Christoph Kukulies wrote
Besides I'd be curious what the problem is. f2c is so mature
that it is unlikely that there is a 'problem' with f2c.
It's more likely there is a problem with the fortran code
not being 100% f77 standard
Hi Keresztfalvi,
Christian Mondrup warned me, that he has problems with f2c and PMX beyond
2.10. Indeed, I haven't mentioned, that I tried some time ago only PMX 2.0
with f2c... And I haven't tried the latest release.
Sorry for the inaccuracy.
BTW I've f2c-19971204. Is there any newer?
Of
Hi Don!
I have now tried to compile the code with f2c, and I get several
errors when trying that: f2c -Nn802 -Nx400 pmx218.f
g1etnote:
Error on line 1088 of pmx218.f: Statement order error: declaration after DATA
Warning on line 2817 of pmx218.f: local variable relacc never used
Warning on
I have built (15 years ago) a F77 static checker named FTAx. Although
limited to f77 (and not f90 of f9x) it appears to be a powerful test
tool.
It runs presently on DOS and several UNIX systems. I somebody requires
it, I could easily port it to Linux (I use RedHat 6.1).
FTAx analyses all
The data statement is indeed out of order, but moving it doesn't fix things.
Program compiled OK and ran with -O0 (is -O equivalent to -O1?). But output
tex file is wrong; lots of fermata's etc that are not in the input.
I don't understand the warnings. The variables mentioned are in a common
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:53:02PM +0100, Reinhard Katzmann wrote:
Hi Don!
I have now tried to compile the code with f2c, and I get several
errors when trying that: f2c -Nn802 -Nx400 pmx218.f
g1etnote:
Error on line 1088 of pmx218.f: Statement order error: declaration after DATA
Yes,
13 matches
Mail list logo
