Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, March 27, 2007 at 18:10:22 -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Alain Bench wrote:
some terminals (Rxvt?) can display simultaneously Latin-1 and UTF-8.
Something has to provide the mode-switch between UTF-8 and Latin-1.
I meant *without* mode
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Alain Bench wrote:
some terminals (Rxvt?) can display simultaneously Latin-1 and UTF-8.
Something has to provide the mode-switch between UTF-8 and Latin-1.
I meant *without* mode switch. Something that would print (fake):
| $ printf \0351 \0303\0251\n #
On Monday, March 26, 2007 at 16:39:36 +0200, Vincent Lefèvre wrote:
about files that contain both ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8, to let the user
decide. [...] it can happen in diffs where some files are encoded in
ISO-8859-1 and others in UTF-8.
That's definitely undecidable by the
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Alain Bench wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2007 at 16:39:36 +0200, Vincent Lefèvre wrote:
about files that contain both ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8, to let the user
decide. [...] it can happen in diffs where some files are encoded in
ISO-8859-1 and others in UTF-8.
That's
Salut Alain,
On 2007-03-25 20:21:35 +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
Bonjour Vincent,
On Sunday, March 25, 2007 at 4:28:36 +0200, Vincent Lefèvre wrote:
On 2007-03-24 16:05:08 +0100, Alain Bench wrote:
Setting UTF-8 after ISO-8859-1 is useless. Any string is always
valid Latin-1.
Re: Vincent Lefevre 2007-03-25 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting UTF-8 after ISO-8859-1 is useless. Any string is always
valid Latin-1. UTF-8 will never be tried nor selected.
Shouldn't characters 128-159 be regarded as invalid? Text should
contain only printable characters and some restricted
Hello Christoph!
On Sunday, March 25, 2007 at 13:30:12 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
CP1251 (iirc, the last digit could be different) is what windows
usually uses. It is a superset of latin1, with characters in the
128-159 range, mainly some quotes. That could also be a good guess.
Bonjour Vincent,
On Sunday, March 25, 2007 at 4:28:36 +0200, Vincent Lefèvre wrote:
On 2007-03-24 16:05:08 +0100, Alain Bench wrote:
Setting UTF-8 after ISO-8859-1 is useless. Any string is always
valid Latin-1.
Shouldn't characters 128-159 be regarded as invalid?
No, I don't think so,
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Alain Bench wrote:
Hello Christoph!
On Sunday, March 25, 2007 at 13:30:12 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
CP1251 (iirc, the last digit could be different) is what windows
usually uses. It is a superset of latin1, with characters in the
128-159 range, mainly some quotes.
On Monday, March 19, 2007 at 10:10:40 +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:
you can set assumed_charset=iso-8859-1:utf-8
Setting UTF-8 after ISO-8859-1 is useless. Any string is always
valid Latin-1. UTF-8 will never be tried nor selected.
The reversed order,
10 matches
Mail list logo
