On Tuesday, April 10 at 07:31 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
This also happened a couple times when I upgraded the library; I
assumed that maybe they'd changed their on-disk format, refused to
read in the old format, and mutt simply fell back to fetching all
the headers every time.
It would still
On Sunday, 08 April 2007 at 21:53, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Saturday, April 7 at 01:29 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
When it detects that the cache is outdated, does it delete it and
create a new one, or does it still silently ignore the cache
(requiring the user to guess why mutt is suddenly
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd dare the guess that asking for perl as a build dependency would
be more reasonable than asking for python.
No. As in, Python may not be on older commercial Unix boxes, but I've
always found Python has less edges where you get caught than Perl has.
On Wednesday, 04 April 2007 at 17:24, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, April 4 at 03:23 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract the type definitions
for the structures hcache saves, pipes them
On Saturday, April 7 at 01:29 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
When it detects that the cache is outdated, does it delete it and
create a new one, or does it still silently ignore the cache
(requiring the user to guess why mutt is suddenly slower)?
Actually I'm a little puzzled by this. In my
* Brendan Cully on Wednesday, April 04, 2007 at 15:23:02 -0700:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract the type definitions
for the structures hcache saves, pipes them through an MD5, and uses
an unsigned long's worth of the
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:27:42PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
On Wednesday, 04 April 2007 at 17:24, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, April 4 at 03:23 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract
Re: David Laight 2007-04-05 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:31:11AM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
* Brendan Cully on Wednesday, April 04, 2007 at 15:23:02 -0700:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract the
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:31:11AM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
* Brendan Cully on Wednesday, April 04, 2007 at 15:23:02 -0700:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract the type definitions
for the structures hcache saves,
On Thursday, 05 April 2007 at 10:15, David Champion wrote:
* On 2007.04.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it almost certainly won't be installed on (say) a NetBSD system.
(And neither will perl)
It is only used at build time. (And perl
On Wednesday, April 4 at 03:23 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract the type definitions
for the structures hcache saves, pipes them through an MD5, and uses
an unsigned long's worth of the result
On Wednesday, 04 April 2007 at 17:24, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, April 4 at 03:23 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Here's a patch that attempts to version the header cache more
accurately. It uses a little script to extract the type definitions
for the structures hcache saves, pipes them
12 matches
Mail list logo
