David DeSimone on Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 10:10:36PM -0600:
What relevance does the message date have to the filename of the
message folder? The default $index_format is:
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s
And I'm trying to understand why `%b' is between those braces, when
Scott McDermott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what %d is for then. It's specified as being the
date and time, as specified by $date_format, itself a string parsed by
strftime(). It this can be accomplished as easily using the
bracketized methods, then why does %d exist?
If I
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 05:40:04AM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
Fixing your mail to always come from a single address really isn't that
hard. Or subscribe both accounts, and send it to /dev/null on one. But
don't make your e-mail name problem into our spam problem.
Hell yes.
The whole reason I
Le Sat 06/02/1999, David DeSimone disait
Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you _read_ the beginning of my post that you quoted above? I give
another really good reason or two for at least mutt-dev to be open.
Because it's listed in the "mutt -v" output, right? Sounds
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 01:02:53PM -0500, Stan Ryckman wrote:
The procmail list is open (for similar reasons; the procmail man
page points to it), yet it only gets maybe one piece of spam per
month. How? It only accepts posts that have the list address in
the To: or Cc: header. Nearly all
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 09:55:23PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Maybe I should start using group-reply at all times, but that gives the
old dupe-message problem, solved only if the remote users uses Mutt (or
some sort of de-duping agent; most don't).
not completely correct. Mutt uses
On Monday, 08 February 1999, at 00:27:45 (+),
Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
Nope. You misunderstand, Michael. Scott is asking about the
unparenthesized '%d' in index_format. As David already answered, the
the reason is probably historical, since %d is completely equivalent to
%{.} where
