On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 04:03:52AM -0230, Chris Gushue wrote:
I guess I should paste basically what I am now doing with procmail.
## ~/.procmailrc
looks good...
:0:
*
0inbox
The "*" line here isn't needed; if there are no "*" lines
procmail applies the rule.
## end of ~/.procmailrc
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 09:35:20PM -0230, Chris Gushue wrote:
Is there a way to archive mailboxes at the beginning of every month (or
some other period) like Pine does? Just after a couple weeks, my
debian-user mailbox (mbox) is 3.6 MB with over 1200 messages. As the
mailbox gets bigger, Mutt
Gerald Oskoboiny ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 04:03:52AM -0230, Chris Gushue wrote:
I guess I should paste basically what I am now doing with procmail.
## ~/.procmailrc
looks good...
:0:
*
0inbox
The "*" line here isn't needed; if there are no "*" lines
ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/urlview-0.7.tar.gz
Jeremy?
On 1999-08-19 01:47:28 -0400, Fairlight wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 01:47:28 -0400
From: Fairlight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: urlview ???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer:
Thomas Roessler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/urlview-0.7.tar.gz
Jeremy?
It's wrong in the manual, not the web site per se. I sent in a patch for
it a month or two ago, here it is again.
On 1999-08-19 01:47:28 -0400, Fairlight wrote:
The ftp url on
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 02:53:40AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
It's wrong in the manual, not the web site per se. I sent in a patch for
it a month or two ago, here it is again.
Uh HUH!...That's what I get for RTFMing! :) *grin*
--
Fairlight- |||[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
*hopeful look*
I love the threading...but I like my folders presented most-recent-first.
So...I'm using reverse-threads.
However...What I'd -really- like is what reverse-threads gives me, except
where there's a thread, have it going DOWN, not up.
I know this seems contradictory, but it's
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
I love the threading...but I like my folders presented most-recent-first.
So...I'm using reverse-threads.
However...What I'd -really- like is what reverse-threads gives me, except
where there's a thread, have it going DOWN, not up.
Been having problems with 0.95.7i. I discovered -Z last night...after
defining all my mailboxes from procmail, plus ! to start with.
NowI could see it saying that /var/spool/mail/fairlite had no new
mail...maybe irc does something when it checks my mailbox. BUT... -Z
should -not- tell me
hello,
fairlight's talking about urlview reminded me of a mod i made to url_handler.sh
in order to get it to play nicely with ncftp. it seems that, since i have
ncftp on my machine, url_view prefers to use (and i do too for that matter)
ncftp. well -- at least with the version of ncftp i have
I have the following line w/regex in my .muttrc to highlight URLs in my
messages:
color body yellow default (http|ftp)://[_a-zA-Z0-9\./~\-]+
However, when I get a url with a question mark in it, it does not work
properly. I thought that the simple solution would be to add a \? to the
character
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% Is there a way to remove the delivered-to line when bouncing a message?
From the bounce command in mutt, I don't think so. It would be a
little ugly, but you could always save the message to another mailbox,
edit that mailbox and remove any
David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999:
Oh, yeah -- I got sidetracked above :-) I'm no pop expert, but I've
bounced messages to myself and to friends before, and they always get
it. Why do you say that the delivered-to entry for ens-lyon.fr caused
it to not be
On 1999-08-19 09:29:03 -0400, Fairlight wrote:
NowI could see it saying that /var/spool/mail/fairlite had no
new mail...maybe irc does something when it checks my mailbox.
BUT... -Z should -not- tell me there's no new mail in any of my
mailboxes when I have two freshly generated
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 04:18:17PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-08-19 09:29:03 -0400, Fairlight wrote:
NowI could see it saying that /var/spool/mail/fairlite had no
new mail...maybe irc does something when it checks my mailbox.
BUT... -Z should -not- tell me there's no new
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 03:04:56PM +0200, Jan Peter Hecking wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
I love the threading...but I like my folders presented most-recent-first.
So...I'm using reverse-threads.
However...What I'd -really- like is what
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 11:24:53AM -0400, Ken W wrote:
I just had a thought. Look at your X-Mailer header:
X-Mailer: Mutt i
Maybe something simply went weird in the source code? Not sure where
the version comes from for that. Did you try unpacking the source
again and rebuilding?
To be more precise, when I try to run mutt-0.95.4, it tells me
"Mutt does not like to run with privileges." I assume that means
mod privileges, so I changed privileges and nothing I tried would
allow me to run mutt. I could run it as root in my single-user
operation, and I could send messages
On 1999-08-19 13:01:31 -0400, sam wrote:
To be more precise, when I try to run mutt-0.95.4, it tells me
"Mutt does not like to run with privileges." I assume that means
mod privileges, so I changed privileges and nothing I tried would
allow me to run mutt.
You should not have installed
Nathan Cullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
color body yellow default (http|ftp)://[_a-zA-Z0-9\./~\-]+
color body yellow default (http|ftp)://[_a-zA-Z0-9\./~\-\?]+
Error in /home/heat/.muttrc, line 67: Invalid range end
Mutt has its own internal parser that examines your input lines before
Hi, folks --
I have the following feature patches now applied to my new copy of
0.95.7i and will start playing with it :-)
What's the scoop with feature patches, though? I presume that the
authors simply haven't updated patchlist.c to mention them -- and does
anyone care?
Here's how my `mutt
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 17:31:12 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999:
Oh, yeah -- I got sidetracked above :-) I'm no pop expert, but I've
bounced messages to myself and to friends before, and they always get
it. Why do you say
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 1999:
This may actually be qmail's loop detection kicking in... At least
that's what I'd guess.
Yes: the message comes from vinc17.org, it has automatically been
forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I've bounced it to vinc17.org.
I'm
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 09:57:20AM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
hello,
fairlight's talking about urlview reminded me of a mod i made to
url_handler.sh
in order to get it to play nicely with ncftp. it seems that, since i have
ncftp on my machine, url_view prefers to use (and i do too for
24 matches
Mail list logo
