Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:30:14AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Magnus Bodin proclaimed on mutt-users that: As of RFC 821 http://rfc821.x42.com/ the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see local-part and

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread David Porter
* Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Magnus Bodin proclaimed on mutt-users that: As of RFC 821 http://rfc821.x42.com/ the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see local-part and quoted-string). It seems though, that

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Magnus Bodin proclaimed on mutt-users that: ' should be " according to the RFC. ah thanks ... so, I did three things ... 1. Talked raw smtp : rcpt to:"suresh test"@kcircle.com Result - Works. 2. Sent using mutt to "suresh test"@kcircle.com and then sent to "suresh test"@kcircle.com just in

Re: tagging unread

2000-07-10 Thread Holger Lillqvist
On Jul 9, David Champion wrote: On 2000.07.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Jason Helfman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I searched threw the manual and it looks us though you may not be able to tag something as unread. If this is the case, why? If I am wrong, can you please point me to the

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As of RFC 821 http://rfc821.x42.com/ the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Michael Tatge
Magnus Bodin muttered: As of RFC 821 http://rfc821.x42.com/ the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see local-part and quoted-string). It seems though, that the mutt client does not support the use of an address like

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Magnus Bodin muttered: As of RFC 821 http://rfc821.x42.com/ the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see local-part and quoted-string). It seems though,

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: It seems though, that the mutt client does not support the

Re: Mutt not following RFC822 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:43:28AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Re: browsing imap folders, and other questions

2000-07-10 Thread Kai Blin
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:17:56PM -0700, Mark D. Anderson wrote: ...[snip]... I apologize; I got off-track. What I meant to say is: then enter an IMAP server spec: e.g., {imap.demo.int/ssl} That will put you into browse mode on that IMAP path. -- -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

1.2 slower than 1.0 over NFS

2000-07-10 Thread Ives Aerts
We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I would like to upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower than 1.0 when reading my mailbox over NFS. Compiling with --disable-fcntl helps, but that doesn't seem to be recommended according to the FAQ on www.mutt.org. The same FAQ also claims that

Re: gzip patch with maildir

2000-07-10 Thread Bennett Todd
2000-07-09-01:10:51 Ronny Haryanto: [...] And for archives I don't think there's any advantage of using maildir over mbox, which loads faster. [...] In the context of a discussion of the compressed folders patch, I don't disagree with your statement, but taken in isolation I'd have to

Re: Fcc'ing to sent...

2000-07-10 Thread David T-G
Jason -- ...and then Jason Helfman said... % % set record=+sent/ ... % % I have all the folders working, however, postponed and sent still seem % to be actually files, not in the folder Maildir format that I am seeing % now. Try either removing your sent file and creating a sent maildir or

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

2000-07-10 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:37:11PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Magnus Bodin muttered: As of RFC 821 http://rfc821.x42.com/ the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be

keymaps header file

2000-07-10 Thread Michael Soulier
Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't think I had before. Making all in charmaps No suffix list. For charmap support, please read INSTALL cd . \ CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status creating Makefile

Re: keymaps header file

2000-07-10 Thread David T-G
Michael -- ...and then Michael Soulier said... % Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't % think I had before. You probably did, but may not have noticed. % ... % keymap.h:112: keymap_defs.h: No such file or directory % *** Error exit code 1 % %

Re: keymaps header file

2000-07-10 Thread Michael Soulier
That appears to have done it. Thanks. Mike On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 02:24:53PM -0400, David T-G wrote: Michael -- ...and then Michael Soulier said... % Hey guys. I'm rebuilding mutt-1.2i, and I'm having a problem that I don't % think I had before. You probably did,

autoconf version

2000-07-10 Thread Michael Soulier
Hey guys. So 1.2i is building, but I just tried 1.2.4i for the hell of it, and I got this. [bmerh56e-pegctrl-mutt-1.2.4]$ make cd . aclocal -I m4 cd . autoheader /opt/corp/unsupported/bin/autoheader: Symbol `PROTOTYPES' is not covered by

Mutt-1.2.4i Fails to Find PGP5 Keys

2000-07-10 Thread Howard Arons
I'm trying to upgrade to 1.2.4, but there's a problem with encrypting mail with PGP 5. Let's say I've written a message to "recipient@fqdomain". After I enter "p" in the Compose menu, and then "e" for encrypt, I see the message: "Looking for keys matching "recipient@fqdomain"... for a