Re: threads, annoying threads

2000-11-30 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:47:58AM +0100, Jesper Holmberg wrote: Subject: Re: Konstituerande =?iso-8859-1?Q?m=F6te?= , FRV My guess would be that this means there is something wrong with the character encoding between the systems. But how would one correct this, apart from manually

Re: Advanced searching revisited

2000-11-30 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:05:49PM +0100, Daniel González Gasull wrote: Hi! :-) * Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Couldn't it be left as an exercise to the witted user or 3rd-party-developer to write a good search-enginge (probably based on grepmail) and

Re: folder-hooks with IMAP mailboxes?

2000-11-30 Thread Conor Daly
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:06:29PM -0500 or thereabouts, Tabor J. Wells wrote: On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 08:01:29PM +, Conor Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] is thought to have said: Ah, got it! use folder-hook INBOX.mutt-users set sort=thread instead so long as the folder appears in

Re: latest version of mutt (1.3.14i?)

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-11-29 19:52:54 +, Paul A. Cheshire wrote: Subject: latest version of mutt (1.3.14i?) 1.3.12i is the latest version. -- Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: folder-hooks with IMAP mailboxes?

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-11-30 09:34:56 +, Conor Daly wrote: mailboxes ! {server}INBOX.mutt-users What's the exclamation mark for. It's a short-hand for your inbox. -- Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

turning save-hook into fcc-save-hook

2000-11-30 Thread Lance Simmons
Awhile ago, someone posted an extremely helpful save-hook: save-hook . "+%(%Y%m)/%a" # Save mails to date-received/user@host I'd like to turn that into an fcc-save-hook, but fcc doesn't work right. I'm missing something obvious, but what? -- Lance Simmons - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: latest version of mutt (1.3.14i?)

2000-11-30 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Paul A. Cheshire [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Can anyone tell me where to get this? I tried www.mutt.org and linux.tucows.com but they have only earlier versions. www.mutt.org and tucows are listing the current *stable* version. 1.3.x is the *development* version. Get them from

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:11:02AM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote: I'm having a problem sending mail *OUT* of my Linux box. Recieving mail works very well. This problem just 'suddenly' appeared a month or two ago. Everything worked very well for several months. The Linux box is Red Hat 6.1,

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Claus Assmann
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000, Kelly Scroggins wrote: The error produced by Mutt is : /etc/sendmail.cf: line 90: fileclass: cannot open /etc/sendmail.cw: Group writable directory It's not mutt, it's sendmail. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 59 Sep 1 1999 /etc/sendmail.cw It's complaining about the

Re: problem using quoted printable encoding with gpg

2000-11-30 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:40:35PM -0800, David Ellement wrote: [ Background: I was having trouble verifying PGP signatures within mutt. I thought it might have been a mutt issue, and asked on the mutt list. Now I think it is a courier issue, hence the Cc: to Sam Varshavchik ] Perhaps you

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Kelly Scroggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This problem just 'suddenly' appeared a month or two ago. Everything worked very well for several months. [...] Starting sendmail: WARNING: Group writable directory /etc WARNING: Group writable directory /etc WARNING: Group writable directory /etc

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:11:02AM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote: [snip] /etc/sendmail.cf: line 90: fileclass: cannot open /etc/sendmail.cw: Group writable directory [snip] # /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail start Starting sendmail: WARNING: Group writable directory /etc Can you show us the

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:11:02AM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote: The problem isn't sendmail. It's your /etc directory, as the log shows. Somehow, you've given it group write permission. As root, run the following command, and you should be fine: # chmod 0755 /etc I'm having a problem sending

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Kelly Scroggins proclaimed on mutt-users that: I'm having a problem sending mail *OUT* of my Linux box. Recieving mail works very well. Starting sendmail: WARNING: Group writable directory /etc WARNING: Group writable directory /etc WARNING: Group writable directory /etc sounds obvious

Re: sendmail error

2000-11-30 Thread Kelly Scroggins
You were on the right track Anand. I changed the permissions on the /etc directory per the other reply (from Peter) to my plea for help. And now you see this message is from the problem child (linux box). Thanks, kelly Quoting Anand Buddhdev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at

Re: Multiple commands in a macro?

2000-11-30 Thread Michael Tatge
Bruce A. Petro muttered: Can this be done? What I want is to do a tag and then a save to mailbox... For instance I thought it would be something like this: macro index .x "T~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n; ;s =bap-test" but that isn't seeming to do it. Any suggestions? Question2: How can I do

gpg signature path tracing during signature verification

2000-11-30 Thread Darxus
I wrote a couple perl scripts that will display a signature path from your key to the signer of an email, while verifying the signature of the email. They can be found at http://www.chaosreigns.com/code/mutt-sigtrace/ The output looks like: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Nov 30

long 'Sending message...'

2000-11-30 Thread Ken Weingold
When mutt sits for a while on 'Sending message...', is it a mutt or sendmail issue? Or something else? Thanks. -Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest

Re: long 'Sending message...'

2000-11-30 Thread Gary
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:22:57AM -0500 or thereabouts, Ken Weingold wrote: When mutt sits for a while on 'Sending message...', is it a mutt or sendmail issue? Or something else? This is the same problem that I have mentioned earlier. Many thought it was a sendmail problem. However, I