My shell account provided by my web hosting company has been moved
from a FreeBSD system to a much more modern Linux system. They have
installed mutt (1.5.17 I think) for use there, I was using my own
build of mutt 1.5.16 on the old BSD system.
It all works pretty much the same (no change of
Hi Chris!
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Chris G wrote:
It all works pretty much the same (no change of home directory so my
muttrc is the same one) except that every time I send a mail message
mutt tells me there's new mail in my sentmail folder - true enough but
not very helpful! It didn't do that
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Chris!
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Chris G wrote:
It all works pretty much the same (no change of home directory so my
muttrc is the same one) except that every time I send a mail message
mutt tells me there's new mail in
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:32:24AM +, Chris G wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Chris!
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Chris G wrote:
It all works pretty much the same (no change of home directory so my
muttrc is the same one) except that every
Hi,
yes, absolutely; ~b stas does find stas
What I mean is that when I am in my inbox folder, I usually have to
look for an email from somebody; what I usually do is to look for that
somebody and then order the folder according to the sender, this way I
can quickly look for the email I was
[please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-06 12:41 +0100]:
I think you mean $simple_search with the default ~f %s | ~s %s.
Right! Sorry, my mistake.
In any case, now I have set default_hook=(~f %s !~P) | (~P ~C %s) |
~s %s in my muttrc and still / stas does
Hi,
Segmentation fault occurs when using the operator on command line:
~/temp/usr/bin/mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Testbody
Looking up localhost...
Connecting to localhost...
Authenticating (LOGIN)...
Segmentation fault
How ever if
~/temp/usr/bin/mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is used and we go through
What's a reliable way of removing empty maildirs?
Presumably it's possible but you'd have to follow some protocol that
wouldn't interfere with the proper writing of messages to the maildir.
Or is it simply not possible, in which case the wonderful concept of
maildir not needing file locking is
and yet I would love to get rid of the To: thing... I don't have a
From: in my inbox... it's a word repeated unnecessary as many times
as email I have sent... I know I have sent them, it's the SENT
folder...
2007/12/6, Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why did you set default_hook and not
I've an address for outgoing mail (with my provider's domain)
and a local one ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). When I send local mail,
in the header I fond always, as From field, the external
address. There is a way to tell Mutt to use the external
address only for outgoing emails and the internal one
for
Why did you set default_hook and not simple_search? This is mentioned
in the mail you are replying to.
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
because I am preparing a big move to another country and I didn't look
carefully?
my excuses, my fault
thanks a lot
Pau
* Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-06 14:15 +0100]:
and yet I would love to get rid of the To: thing... I don't have a
From: in my inbox... it's a word repeated unnecessary as many times
as email I have sent... I know I have sent them, it's the SENT
folder...
Redefine
=- John Magolske wrote on Wed 5.Dec'07 at 20:50:00 -0800 -=
I was ready to send this message as a question to the list when
one last round of searching brought this answer...figured I'd send
it anyway to maybe increase the odds of finding for others
searching out a similar solution.
John++
=- Chris G wrote on Thu 6.Dec'07 at 13:03:13 + -=
What's a reliable way of removing empty maildirs?
Presumably it's possible but you'd have to follow some protocol that
wouldn't interfere with the proper writing of messages to the maildir.
chmod a-w dir/new
rm -rf dir
--
© Rado S. --
=- Mauro Sacchetto wrote on Thu 6.Dec'07 at 14:16:02 +0100 -=
I've an address for outgoing mail (with my provider's domain) and
a local one ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). When I send local mail, in the header
I fond always, as From field, the external address. There is a
way to tell Mutt to use the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, December 6 at 04:46 PM, quoth Rado S:
=- Chris G wrote on Thu 6.Dec'07 at 13:03:13 + -=
What's a reliable way of removing empty maildirs?
Presumably it's possible but you'd have to follow some protocol that
wouldn't interfere
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:03:20AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Thursday, December 6 at 04:46 PM, quoth Rado S:
=- Chris G wrote on Thu 6.Dec'07 at 13:03:13 + -=
What's a reliable way of removing empty maildirs?
Presumably it's possible but you'd have to follow some protocol that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, December 6 at 11:40 AM, quoth Paul Hoffman:
chmod a-w dir/new
if [ `find dir -type f` ] ; then
You have to do something like this instead:
found=`find dir -type f`
if -n $found ; then
At least on my system (Mac OS X 10.3 =
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:40:04AM -0500, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:03:20AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Thursday, December 6 at 04:46 PM, quoth Rado S:
=- Chris G wrote on Thu 6.Dec'07 at 13:03:13 + -=
What's a reliable way of removing empty maildirs?
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:47:53AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Thursday, December 6 at 11:40 AM, quoth Paul Hoffman:
chmod a-w dir/new
if [ `find dir -type f` ] ; then
You have to do something like this instead:
found=`find dir -type f`
if -n $found ; then
At least on my
* Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06.12.07 21:31]:
Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I
was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have
no intention of ever using it again. The support is for a very old
version of Mixmaster and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, December 6 at 03:31 PM, quoth Paul Hoffman:
Or using backticks:
if [ `find dir -type f` ]; then
I don't know if that's any more portable, though.
Backticks aren't any more portable, I don't think... but it doesn't
matter too
chmod a-w dir/new
if [ `find dir -type f` ] ; then
You have to do something like this instead:
[snip other responses]
Perhaps I've misunderstood the reason for doing this, but I would just
ask find to do a rmdir, and let it fail if the directory isn't empty.
find dir -depth -type d -exec
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2007, Rado S ha scritto:
I've an address for outgoing mail (with my provider's domain) and
a local one ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). When I send local mail, in the header
I fond always, as From field, the external address. There is a
way to tell Mutt to use the external
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, December 6 at 09:15 PM, quoth A Darren Dunham:
Perhaps I've misunderstood the reason for doing this, but I would
just ask find to do a rmdir, and let it fail if the directory isn't
empty.
find dir -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} \;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, December 6 at 10:36 PM, quoth Mauro Sacchetto:
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2007, Rado S ha scritto:
I've an address for outgoing mail (with my provider's domain) and
a local one ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). When I send local mail, in the header
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:15:10PM +, A Darren Dunham wrote:
chmod a-w dir/new
if [ `find dir -type f` ] ; then
You have to do something like this instead:
[snip other responses]
Perhaps I've misunderstood the reason for doing this, but I would just
ask find to do a rmdir, and
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2007, Kyle Wheeler ha scritto:
Yes. When you use the ^ in your pattern, you're telling it to match
the beginning of the address (the $ at the end tells it to match the
end of the address). Thus [EMAIL PROTECTED] will ONLY match @debian and
nothing else---it will not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, December 6 at 11:35 PM, quoth Mauro Sacchetto:
If you use this hook instead:
send-hook '~t @debian$' 'my_hdr From: Mutt User [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
...then it WILL match all three examples I listed above, but will NOT
match
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:51:44PM +0100, Francesco Ciattaglia wrote:
* Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06.12.07 21:31]:
Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I
was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have
no intention of ever
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2007, Kyle Wheeler ha scritto:
But when I controll in inbox after the delivering of email,
When you control in inbox? I don't understand what you're talking
about.
I mean that, after receiving the email, it stays in inbox.
In the header of this (seceived) mail, i find
I needed to empty some subdirectories and this is what I did:
du test
4 test/cur
4 test/tmp
4 test/new
16 test
Nothing in the test directory, so I deleted it.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:28:26PM +, Chris G wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:15:10PM +, A Darren
On 06Dec2007 21:15, A Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| chmod a-w dir/new
| if [ `find dir -type f` ] ; then
|
| You have to do something like this instead:
| [snip other responses]
|
| Perhaps I've misunderstood the reason for doing this, but I would just
| ask find to do a rmdir,
Cameron Simpson wrote:
Yeah, but without even invoking find:
rmdir dir/new dir/tmp dir/cur dir \
|| mkdir -p dir/new dir/tmp dir/cur
Robust, safe, trivial.
Hooray for simplicity. :)
People always seem to forget that rmdir is perfectly safe, in that
it won't remove empty directories.
34 matches
Mail list logo
