Re: how to escape complex pattern for folder-hook?

On 2016-07-25 23:44 +0200, Gregor Zattler wrote: > I get status emails in some mail folder which I occasionally > delete with delete-pattern (bound to "D") and this pattern: > > ~s"Cron nice ionice -c 3 ~/bin/my-notmuch-new-and-tagging" > ~b^"No new mail." !~b"^Processed" > > >

Re: / l ~b has become extremely slow

On 2016-07-08 09:37 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > There was a regression that was fixed in 1.5.24: > https://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/755a18da99bc > > I would suggest upgrading to at least 1.5.24 and even better to 1.6.2. Thanks ! Unfortunately, I'm stuck with 1.5.23 as that's what is in

/ l ~b has become extremely slow

After upgrading from Mutt 1.5.21 to 1.5.23, trying to on the contents of the bodies of emails ("l ~b some-string") has become shockingly slow. It goes through about 10 messages per second, taking minutes to filter a medium-size mailbox. Granted, this is on a ten-year-old Athlon X2 but, as I

Re: Default To: per folder

On 2010-09-04 20:07 +0200, E. Prom wrote: On Saturday, 04 September 2010, 19:05:40 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI n...@petole.demisel.net wrote: Andre Majorel aym-t...@teaser.fr writes: Is there a way to set a default value for To: in mail ? It would be very useful after a folder-hook

Replying to oneself

Suppose you're sending email back and forth between two of your addresses. j...@joe.com sends email at j...@joe.com. When joe2 replies, the reply goes to joe2 because alternates is set to joe[...@joe\.com. If reply_self was set, the reply would go to joe1 as expected. But reply_self = no is

Default To: per folder

Is there a way to set a default value for To: in mail ? It would be very useful after a folder-hook for mailing lists etc. -- André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/

Re: Position of the target of a jump

On 2010-07-18 13:17 -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 05:58:18PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: Is there a way to configure Mutt so that, after a jump, the target line does not end up at the edge of the screen ? Perhaps something like less's -j or a minimum number of lines

Position of the target of a jump

Is there a way to configure Mutt so that, after a jump, the target line does not end up at the edge of the screen ? Perhaps something like less's -j or a minimum number of lines from the top or bottom of the screen... -- André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/

Re: Soft killfile, folder-hook limit

On 2010-02-04 09:10 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: I think that's because push actually pushes those commands onto a stack which mutt subsequently pops. Try putting them in this order instead: folder-hook infested 'push limit! ~f annoy...@gmail.comenter' folder-hook .'push

Re: Soft killfile, folder-hook limit

On 2010-02-04 00:33 -0600, David Champion wrote: Limit is a function that you bind to a key. To tell mutt to execute a function, you use the push command. This emulates keystrokes by pushing them into the keyboard input queue. folder-hook .'push limit~Aenter' folder-hook infested

Viewing manual.txt.gz in a non-UTF-8 terminal

How do you view manual.txt.gz in a non-UTF-8 terminal ? iconv --from utf-8 --to iso-8859-1 bombs at line 11 and recode utf-8..latin-1 at line 2769. -- André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/

Soft killfile, folder-hook limit

I'm trying to set up a sort of soft killfile whereby messages from a certain address are not shown. That would be folder-hook . limit ~A folder-hook infested limit ! ~f annoy...@gmail.com right ? Except that there's no limit command. Is there a way around that ? -- André Majorel

Re: Sorting headers in message viewer ?

On 2007-10-19 19:16 +, Dave Evans wrote: On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: It would be nice if there was a way to have the headers sorted (in case-insensitive alphabetical order) in the message viewer. It's something I regularly need when I'm looking

Toggle between wrapping and chopping in viewer

In the viewer, is there a way to toggle between wrapping long lines and truncating them to the width of the terminal, like -S with less or :set wrap/:set nowrap in Vim ? -- André Majorel URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/ Do not use this account for regular correspondence. See the URL above for

Mutt as hybrid mailbox/NNTP client

Is there a way to use Mutt as a hybrid news client, which would send your posts through NNTP but read other people's posts from a mailbox file, instead of retrieving them through NNTP or fishing them out of a slrnpull-style, one-file-per-article spool ? Retrieval would be done by something like

Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

On 2002-03-14 13:52 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: I am using the format yymmdd on my *webpages* - and for dates only. apart from that I was using it in the attribution - with hh:mm. but if applied to messages - which century can this be? 1900? 2100? Think, man, THINK! no - try HARDER! ;-)

Re: vvv.nntp and local spools

On 2002-02-17 22:27 -0600, Peter Horst wrote: Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, à la slrn/slrnpull? I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great, but it would be better without the slow Internet article checking, etc. I'm quite interested in slrnpull support too. I use

Re: mutt and NFS

On 2002-02-10 10:09 -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2002, Paul Ackersviller wrote: Sorry for chiming in late on this, but it sounds an lot like what I saw once when I tried a performance tweak on one of my filesystems. Some filesystems have a mount option noatime to not update

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2002-01-01 10:03 +, Benjamin Smith wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2001-12-28 11:19 -0500, Dan Boger wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command. It's pipe-message (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too and

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle would do the trick but Mutt says pipe-message: unknown command

Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to translate his prose to something less obnoxious. Now how do I configure Mutt to automatically pipe his messages through the filter when reading or replying to him ?

Re: resend-message (esc e) not honouring $record

On 2001-10-01 12:12 -0700, Ben Reser wrote: On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate or an overlook ? It's deliberate. Search

resend-message (esc e) not honouring $record

When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate or an overlook ? -- André Majorel URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/ (Not speaking for my employer, etc.)

Re: Quoting message in replies

On 2001-05-17 20:17 -0600, Duke Normandin wrote: Seems like what I was wanting to do is taboo... OK! How about: It's not taboo in the sense of arbitrary taboo. It's that you seem to think that it's fine to use whatever format you like for quoting. Perhaps you don't realize that it's not

Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail using non-local SMTP server.)

On 2001-05-16 11:45 +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: Purists and Cassandras that cry out each time a user asks for SMTP delivery in mutt are out of touch. No they're not. They're very much in touch with what they need and want. Mutt should be accessible out of the box. It should work

Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail using non-local SMTP server.)

On 2001-05-16 19:31 +0530, Biju Chacko wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: But don't make Mutt users pay for something they won't use. While I agree with the need to keep one's MUAs and MTAs seperate, I find your argument flawed. There are literally dozens

Re: mutt as newsreader?

On 2001-04-26 01:01 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: I am using a newscache (leafnode) Very nice. Do you think it could be made to work with an slrnpull spool ? / var/ spool/ slrnpull/ news/ comp/ lang/ c/ .minmax

Re: threads expands

On 2001-04-22 13:53 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Check your muttrc (and don't forget /etc/Muttrc and /usr/etc/Muttrc) /usr/etc/Muttrc ? Boy, that's some FHS compliance... -- Andr Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/

Re: Mutt NOT deleting /tmp consistently

On 2001-04-04 10:35 -0600, Duke Normandin wrote: What could be some of the reasons why Mutt would NOT be deleting its temporary files in the muttrc-defined /tmp directory? Permissions?? Tia.. Do your leftover files have backup suffixes (E.G. "*~") ? Mutt can't guess that your editor is

Fwd: Using mutt to sort mailboxes by thread

I have large mailboxes (archives of Usenet groups) that I would like to sort by thread. Thought of tagging all articles in the box and saving them to another mailbox (otT^;C) but how do you do that from a shell script (not interactively) ? -- Andr Majorel Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home: [EMAIL

Using mutt to sort mailboxes by thread

I have large mailboxes (archives of Usenet groups) that I would like to sort by thread. Thought of tagging all articles in the box and saving them to another mailbox (otT^;C) but how do you do that from a shell script (not interactively) ? -- Andr Majorel Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home: [EMAIL

Re: Fwd: Using mutt to sort mailboxes by thread

On 2001-03-26 17:30 -0600, David Champion wrote: On 2001.03.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Andre Majorel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have large mailboxes (archives of Usenet groups) that I would like to sort by thread. Thought of tagging all articles in the box and s