I can only say, Erik wrote the answer I wanted to write.
@Kevin: The new change sounds very promising. Thank you for that
and all your work!
@Derek: I've read your mails in this thread, and I'm in no way
convinced.
HAND
Nicolas
* Derek Martin [2019-06-11 12:47 -0500]:
> Not only that, but I neglected the fact that if the send fails, the
> file your editor produced in order for it to be passed to Mutt will
> still be on disk, so you do IN FACT still have a copy of the message.
I did just (using my old mutt) set sendmail
* Derek Martin [2019-06-11 12:36 -0500]:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:04:25PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > In the event that send fails, the local copy is essential for a resend
> > attempt. No ifs, no buts, no maybes. I'm at a loss to imagine any
> > scenario in which mutt should risk
* Derek Martin [2019-06-11 12:16 -0500]:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:24:11AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Jack M [2019-06-04 10:20 -0500]:
> > > On Tue, June 4, 2019 5:30 am, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > > The other one (mail sent, but no loca
* Ben Boeckel [2019-06-10 11:56 -0400]:
> If you're this paranoid, the only real fix is to have your editor save a
> backup somewhere before handing it off to mutt in the first place
> anyways. After all, mutt could segfault and lose it before the Fcc!
There is one big difference. If mutt
* Francesco Ariis [2019-06-04 19:52 +0200]:
> Hello Grant,
>
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 04:46:50PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2019-06-04, Jack M wrote:
> >
> > > The reason (or *a* reason) is that the old way led to the following
> > > situation: Fcc first, then try to send, something
* Jack M [2019-06-04 10:20 -0500]:
> On Tue, June 4, 2019 5:30 am, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > The other one (mail sent, but no local copy)
>
> Why would this situation would ever occur?
A power failure at the wrong moment. A crash at the wrong moment. ...
These things tend
* "Kevin J. McCarthy" [2019-06-04 09:44 -0700]:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:30:59PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > Does anybody know the reason of this change?
>
> The most recent discussion on mutt-dev was
> <https://marc.info/?l=mutt-dev=146942930418541=
Hallo,
I just noted the entry in UPDATING:
! Fcc now occurs after sending a message. If the fcc fails, mutt will prompt
to try again, or to try another mailbox.
This seems to be:
https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/commit/e106487b1f4ebe7128982486accec11ac6f54b5c
Does anybody know the reason
* tj 78...@web.de [2013-04-22 17:59 -0400]:
I use fcc_clear to store unencrypted copies of encrypted sent
messages. Now I would like to add an extra header field to these local
copies (for later reference), but not to the mail that is being sent
out. Is this possible with mutt? I could not
* Derek Martin inva...@pizzashack.org [2013-02-02 11:44 -0600]:
[save-message]
Now, I will grant you, this feature is a bit schizophrenic. It also
assumes that once it has done whatever it's going to do, that you no
longer want the existing copy of the message, and marks it for
deletion. At
* Peter Davis p...@pfdstudio.com [2012-11-20 13:37 -0500]:
Most workplaces are using email to communicate, and they want maximum
efficiency in that. Users want a way to get a message across quickly,
as opposed to trying to create a beautiful and literate archive.
These efficient mails usually
* Rocco Rutte pd...@gmx.net [2009-07-10 13:44 +0200]:
I don't know if I mentioned this already, but I think I once hacked
support for read-only variables in mutt-ng that would expose certain
internal settings.
Would something like this be useful for mutt, too? If yes, doing this
for one
* JP Bruns emailj...@gmx.de [2009-06-02 10:37 +0200]:
Is there anything for console-only systems? Mutt is a great piece of
software, but - in my eyes - is lacking this important feature. Would it be
possible to take the return-code/-message of the *smtp program and display
that on the
* Javier Rojas jeroja...@devnull.li [2009-02-13 21:37 -0500]:
folder-hook =inbox 'push
collapse-alltag-pattern~(~r3m)entertag-prefix-condsave-message=archivos/inboxenteruntag-pattern~Aentercollapse-all'
which uncollapses, archives, and the collapses back the mailbox
This, however, creates
* Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-28 14:48 -0500]:
I don't remember the difference, if any other than the syntax,
off-hand.
The difference is *when* the command gets executed. With exec, the
function is executed immediately. With push, it is executed the next
time mutt goes into
* Aron Griffis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-30 09:50 -0400]:
Of course this means rebuilding the full set of bindings. Any
other ideas? (apart from changing the approach, remember this is
supposedly theoretical...)
There was at least one discussion about this on mutt-dev. I believe,
there were
* Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-28 16:52 -0500]:
On Monday, July 28 at 09:29 PM, quoth Michael Kjorling:
Something like this:
source gpg -d sensitivestuff.gpg |
No. That can't work (but we can salvage this idea). First, let me
explain why it can't work.
Think about it:
* Marianne Promberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-25 12:17 +0200]:
However, it turns out that even with tag-prefix such as ...
folder-hook . 'push tag-pattern~s
test234entertag-prefixs\Ca\Ck=isomerica/archive\n'
if no message matches ~s test234 it does always save the last
message to the
* Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-16 11:29 -0400]:
If I hit S to save a message and than want to cancel, or some other
action that involves two steps...
What is the right way to cancel that
action?
^G
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
* Vladimir Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-28 10:21 +0100]:
between those. Can I achieve this without restarting mutt, ie. can I
empty the currently defined mailboxes ?
Search your local manual(.txt) for unmailboxes.
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.11
This seems to be for
* Dan H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 14:28 +0100]:
Content-Description: kjlkj
???
1. I can't access encrypted mail that I send. When I try to read
it, I get Could not copy message.
See the thread starting with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
* Clay Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-26 10:57 -0700]:
On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.shtml
That looks like a useful patch. Is it headed for main-line inclusion?
Thank you. There hasn't been much feedback.
Nicolas
--
http
* Dan H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-26 09:50 +0100]:
1. I'd like to have new or unread mail (what's the difference, anyway?)
flagged somehow. Occasionally I see an N next to some messages, but in
general mutt seems to completely oblivious to what's new or unreaed.
At least with maildir,
* Clay Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-26 10:13 -0700]:
On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
You can use encrypt-to in your gpg.conf (see man gpg) or add
--encrypt-to to all the encryption commands in your mutt configuration.
That seems to take a key fingerprint, but my key
* Clay Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-25 22:07 -0700]:
The subject pretty much says it all. I want to set mutt to
automatically encrypt email to anyone who's email has a corresponding
public key in the local gpg keyfile. I know that's more complex than
the usual send-hook entails, but I
* Raphael Brunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-15 22:08 +0100]:
I use the follow hook to tag old messages and save it to a
archive-folder:
folder-hook =051-Sent-Mail
'pushtag-pattern~r12m!~Fentertag-prefixsave-message+052-Sent-Archiveentersync-mailbox'
Now, the problem is, if
[Please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-07 16:11 +0100]:
I must be mentally retarded, but I tried that one and it didn't work
for me... I get always the To:... ??? Please corroborate mi IQ
I just noted that I don't know a way to avoid the 'To '. I seem to
ignore
[please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-06 12:41 +0100]:
I think you mean $simple_search with the default ~f %s | ~s %s.
Right! Sorry, my mistake.
In any case, now I have set default_hook=(~f %s !~P) | (~P ~C %s) |
~s %s in my muttrc and still / stas does
* Pau Amaro-Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-06 14:15 +0100]:
and yet I would love to get rid of the To: thing... I don't have a
From: in my inbox... it's a word repeated unnecessary as many times
as email I have sent... I know I have sent them, it's the SENT
folder...
Redefine
* Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 16:39 -0600]:
Searching in any index (sent, inbox, whatever) relies on the value of
$default_hook, which defaults to ~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s).
I think you mean $simple_search with the default ~f %s | ~s %s.
Nicolas
--
* Todd Zullinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-06 02:47 -0500]:
Gregor Zattler wrote:
I want to use this group feature to switch encryption on and off
depending on emailaddresses:
FWIW, another way I think you can achieve your goal is to use Nicolas
Rachinsky's crypt-autohook patch[1].
* Breen Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-09 19:05 -0700]:
MAILDIR by itself isn't special in procmail. You usually set it so that
you can use it in your delivery recipes:
It is special. Quoting procmailrc(5):
MAILDIR Current directory while procmail is executing (that means
* Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-06 11:08 -0600]:
On Thursday, September 6 at 09:54 PM, quoth Kumar Appaiah:
1. Everything's fine, except that in the pager, if I press backspace,
it says key not bound. If I press Ctrl+H, it works as expected.
Okay... all that means is that
* Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-25 20:58 +1000]:
I read the previous posts and tried in my inbox - press D, use ~= as
the search pattern, press $ to save. But nothing happens. ~= doesn't
tag anything and so nothing gets deleted. I am sure I have duplicate
mails in my inbox as I downloaded
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-17 12:48 +0200]:
One solution would be to bind L to group-reply for the git
mailing list, but a reply-hook is too late for that, and I don't
have a special folder for git mail.
If you do this bind in a message-hook, it should solve the problem, if
* tannhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-19 14:35 +0200]:
the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have the
gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one key.
I'm not sure, but I think there was a patch to use multiple keyids
with a crypt-hook (or
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-15 23:56 +0300]:
Is there any way I can make mutt (or another application)
automatically delete messages in _certain_ folders (such as mailing
lists) that are over a certain number of days old?
I use folder-hooks to execute
push tag-pattern
* Matthew Daubenspeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 09:48 -0400]:
folder-hook =INBOX 'macro index d save-message=INBOX.Trashenter'
This hook is applied to all folders that contain =INBOX.
when in INBOX and INBOX.Work. However, it is using the setup in ALL
folders. Any suggestions?
Add
* Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-28 14:19 -0700]:
What method of cancelling sending a mail are you using that causes a
problem with this send-hook?
The default of abort_unmodified could cause this, I think.
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
* John Haviland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-18 03:04 +1000]:
I am using mutt (another newbie) as a sub-set of another process, i.e
unattended. The mutt section is intended to go into a mailbox and save mail
that matches a subject pattern, delete that mail and then quit
automatically. This is
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-18 10:39 +0200]:
On Oct 15 at 21:59, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
What about
source `colorset.sh`
Where is colorset.sh available?
Write your own. Something like:
#!/bin/sh
if condition; then
echo colorset1
else
echo colorset2
fi
cut here
* Christoph Kampe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-17 01:16 +0200]:
I took the macro from Alain some threads before, to fetch mail by one
keypress.
Like this:
macro index F12 !fetchmail \r
macro pager F12 !fetchmail \r
macro browser F12 !fetchmail \r
Is there a way to get rid of the Please
* Jose Romildo Malaquias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-15 13:42 -0200]:
Is it possible to specify more than one set of colors
to be used by mutt? The color sets would be
selected according to the terminal colors. This way
I could use an appropriate set of colors with a
light backgound terminal,
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-13 00:08 +0200]:
is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
What about set hostname=`hostname`?
Nicolas
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-13 18:04 +0200]:
On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
hostname = `hostname`
Is it what you want ?
No. I want something like this:
if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
set hostname=host2
fi
It should also affect the domain in
* Robert Lillack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-26 17:11 +0200]:
since I have a lot of mailboxes i wanted to see only those
containing new mail while in the browser view. Because I use
MH folders all needed is just a really simple shell script:
for i in `flist -all -recurse -noshowzero
* savanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-27 03:15 +1000]:
Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample
muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it
anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using
it in my .muttrc ;-) ).
I've
* jochen issing [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-26 09:44 +0200]:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:47:01PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* jochen issing [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-25 16:25]:
after my recent update to 1.4i, I am not able able to remove any mails
out of my spool files. I can open
* Rob Lingelbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-23 22:21 -0700]:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
but there was a patch which allowed to
add a comment in an extra header line.
maybe this can solve your problem...
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt
thank you Sven. it might, but let
* Heiko Heil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-21 18:57 +0200]:
That's exactly what I am looking for... Currently I use:
macro index \ch collapse-all;limit~P\n;T~A\n;limit~a\n;^T~A\n \
show my threads #^^
I'm really fascinated what's possible with mutt. I
* Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]:
[...]
I can't find a way to force clear-flag not to move, nor can I find a way to
get back to where I was, taking into account the move that may result from
clear-flag.
Is there a solution other than hacking the source?
Yes.
From
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-18 22:11 +0200]:
i'd like to delete all threads that consist of messages which are older
than 2 months. i thought of something like this
D~r 2m
T~r !~D
;^U
but ^U does not work with tag-prefix. any ideas?
Perhaps does the following patch what you want:
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-13 00:26 +0200]:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 23:47:23 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
I use the attached patch (with mark_old is unset). But I must admit,
I use it only with local Maildirs.
What does it do?
With mark_old unset mutt changes old
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 17:23 +0200]:
* Ryan Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-10 06:32]:
source ~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/|
source ~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/|
* Sven Guckes wrote:
source filename
source filename|
filename
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 22:31 +0200]:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 16:15:36 -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
Vincent Lefevre said:
I want 4 levels (in the same mailbox, to get the benefit of threading):
1) Messages that mustn't be deleted.
2) Messages I've read
* Aldy Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-08 19:29 -0400]:
Now all mutt needs is for ESCf to be able to pick from the
alternates list. But this is very minor.
I use:
alias f_listNicolas Rachinsky list@...
alias f_Nicolas Rachinsky nicolas@...
alias f_dauerreden Nicolas
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-30 17:03 -0400]:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
No, my comments have nothing to do with limiting. I'll draw out an
The hide_missing option doesn't have anything to do with limiting
either.
Really? I didn't know what hide_missing
* Eric Blau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-17 11:16 -0400]:
I am having a problem getting a folder-hook working properly. I have
the following folder-hook in my muttrc file:
folder-hook =INBOX 'push T~r1m\n\;s=archive/INBOX\n'
I want mutt to automatically move mail older than 1 month from my
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-17 14:39 +0200]:
I remember to have a read about about a patch making the
indicator bar always exactly the same color as specified.
The problem is that if the color of the message in the index
is ``bright...'', the foreground color of the bar gets
* Mat Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-12 14:58 +0100]:
me too please. this is really annoying me.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:56:37 +0200, David Jardine wrote:
When is set subscribe for a mailing list, mutt lists
mail received from this list with something like
to [EMAIL
* David Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-12 17:52 +0200]:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Mat Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-12 14:58 +0100]:
Look for index_format. I think you want to replace %L with %F.
Sorry, I somehow missed that section
* David Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-12 21:10 +0200]:
Well, my documentation (did I mention it was version 1.3.28i) of
the %L variable says, if I can copy it correctly (because I've
never found out how to combine r and -i):
If an address to the To or CC header field
* Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-03 04:28 -0400]:
Can mutt set the envelope to the user's choice *at the time of
message compose* to an address different from the message's
From: address?
Yes, of course!
How is it done? For starters, I'd probably want to:
unset envelope_from
then change
* Melvin Q Watchpocket [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-03 08:20 -0400]:
On Sat 08/03/02 at 12:50 PM +0200,
Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-03 04:28 -0400]:
Can mutt set the envelope to the user's choice *at
the time of message compose
* Melvin Q Watchpocket [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-03 18:45 -0400]:
On Sat 08/03/02 at 09:30 PM +0200,
But if you use the MTA (sendmail in this case, and in many cases)
to create an envelope header that's gonna be different from a
message's From: header, (by doing 'sendmail -f'), then it (the
* Patrik Modesto [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-02 12:09 +0200]:
Maybe this is stupid question but I searched man-page to muttrc and find
nothing about it. So, I need to forward message that contains some
attachments. But I need to edit/update the text part of the forwarded
message. What I've
[please use the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this ML]
* Sven Garbade [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-01 10:59 +]:
I'm new to mutt and have two little questions. How can I turn off th
e bell? Is it possible to clear the screen from mails which are marked as deleted?
grep the manual for beep.
* jennyw [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-26 11:22 -0700]:
I've been noticing I get some messages where the subject begins with
=?US-ASCII?Q?the subject?=. I looked this up on google (took some time
Can you send us the whole string? =?US-ASCII?Q?the subject?=
Nicolas
Message-ID: and so it changes.
The MID header is left unchanged, mutt adds:
Resent-From: Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:08:43 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-To: Nicolas Rachinsky nicolas
% continue to use 'bounce' since the list of Received
* Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 13:33 +0200]:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:12:33PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]:
% with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too.
%
% Does that mean that mutt won't be able
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-14 13:19 -0500]:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 01:55:15PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
| * Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 06:02:40 +0200] wrote:
| On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 10:08:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
|
| | Hmmm... Perhaps I've
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-09 16:10 -0500]:
* On 2002.07.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance that somebody can place a compressed archive in
correct mbox format somewhere on the web (I would, but I
have too low quota)?
* Deb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-08 11:27 -0700]:
I'm puzzled... Doing a,
:set ?record
in mutt, displays,
record=/home/deb/Mail/.record
What's the output of :set ?copy ?
Nicolas
* Deb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-03 22:37 -0700]:
* Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-04 06:15:38 +0200]:
set sort=subject
set sort=threads# sorting the mails in threads
set sort_aux=date # sorting the threads
... that works for me
Nope, didn't work. Must be
* Aragon Gouveia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-01 05:31 +0200]:
| By Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [ 2002-07-01 01:41 +0200 ]
This would be very expensive when using mbox folders, because mutt
would have to read all folders completely
* Raoul Bönisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-01 21:46 +0200]:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:39:55AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Aragon Gouveia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-30 23:38 +0200]:
Does anyone know how to have Mutt display a 'U' flag in the folder view if a
mail folder has unread
* Qingjia Zhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-01 01:57 +0800]:
Ah, I usualy have lots of mailboxes, I'll have trouble to remember
which mailbox contains unread mails, so maybe a feature request to be
considered:
6.3.49. folder_format
Type: string
Default: %2C %t %N %F %2l %-8.8u
* Lee J. Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-30 19:13 +0100]:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Lee J. Moore spake thus:
[..]
`~/bin/maildir-count ~/Maildir/%f`
...it's actually, ~/Maildir/%f and *not* ~/Maildir/submaildir
that's being passed to the bash script.
* Aragon Gouveia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-30 23:38 +0200]:
Does anyone know how to have Mutt display a 'U' flag in the folder view if a
mail folder has unread messages? There's no folder_format format string for
it, so I was hoping someone could help me add it to the source. I really suck
* Pedro Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-26 09:44 +0100]:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
It's encoded with quoted-printable, AFAIK quoted-printable requires
the sender to a maximal line length of (I think) 100 bytes, after
which you have to add at least
Please do NOT reply to random messages, create a new thread instead.
* Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-26 23:29 +0530]:
I have defined a folder-hook as:
folder-hook !Trash push enter-commandunset maildir_trashenter
But the error coming is 'push too many arguments'
try
folder-hook
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-21 10:02 -0500]:
...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
% push
tag-pattern~r10d\nuntag-pattern~F|~D|~O|~N\nuntag-pattern!~a\ntag-prefix-condsave-message\n\nsync-mailboxfirst-entrynext-newredraw-screen
%
% It's a bit slow with folders containing almost
Hallo,
does anybody know how/where to get patch-1.3.26.dw.pgp-hook.3 for
mutt-1.5.1. I seem to be unable to reach Dale Woolridge.
Thanks
Nicolas
* AxUm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-11 02:02 -0500]:
Humm, even with that the from in a send hooks only takes effect if
I start a message twice, realname takes the first time.
set use_from
set envelope_from
send-hook x \
'set realname=tc; set from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
any ideas?
* Mike Arrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-10 11:40 -0400]:
Well,
macro index $somekey \
set var1; \
set var 2; \
set var 3
I tried this:
macro compose 3 edit-from^Umy_alias^M; \
edit-bcc^Uother_addr^M Set From to my_alias
I would try it without the
* Mike Arrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-10 11:40 -0400]:
I tried this:
macro compose 3 edit-from^Umy_alias^M; \
edit-bcc^Uother_addr^M Set From to my_alias
Why is there a ';', I don't think you need it. Try it without the ';'
and remove all unneccessary whitespace (the
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-06 09:22 +0200]:
* John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-05 23:22]:
I note that if I resend a message from, say, my outbox by
doing ESC e to open it, edit and send the new message, no copy
of the newly edited and sent message is placed in my
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-06 13:28 -0700]:
you can use a macro (see the archives) to bind 'd' to save messages to a
folder, or better, you can apply cedric duval's excellent trash folder
patch.
http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/
2. When I'm in the index mode with all mail
* Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-05 22:39 +0200]:
can I define a default folder for saving attachments (something like
/home/me/download) in the .muttrc?
macro attach s 'save-entrybol~/I/eol' 'save attachment'
Nicolas
PROTECTED]Esc
map #F2 1G/^From: /e+1CRCMike Arrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]Esc
I use the following to set the From address:
macro compose v edit-from^Uf_tab Absender wählen
alias f_de Nicolas Rachinsky xxx
alias f_net Nicolas Rachinsky xxx
Nicolas
* jennyw [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-03 17:32 -0700]:
Also, if resend is the way to go ... is there a way to get messages that
are resent (and possibly edited) to be saved the same way that outgoing
messages are via set record=?
There was a bug. It now works fine (sorry, don't know exactly
* Kyle Knack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-31 23:48:21 -0400]:
I recently switched my workstation from RedHat 7.1 to SuSE 7.3, and
now I'm having a funny problem when I compose mail. Mutt is no longer
asking me for a recipient or CC address when I hit 'm' to compose mail
(ask for CC is
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-27 22:37:07 +0200]:
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-25 08:27]:
Do you really think the time is usefull without a timezone?
no timezone given - GMT!
talk about defaults here..
But you're loosing useful information with converting to GMT
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-25 01:36:30 +0200]:
* Rory Campbell-Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-23 11:38]:
--
Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LEARN TO http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/attribution.html
ATTRIBUTE! http://learn.to/attribute
Summary: Name+Address
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-25 19:00:05 +1000]:
On 02:15 25 May 2002, Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If you mess up, u undoes any number
| of edits. [Cntrl]R undoes the undos.
| will work for elvis and vim only.
| won't work when vi is nvi.
Of course, unless
* Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 21:11:57 -0700]:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:12:48PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
What exactly are you referring to when you say ^H? The backspace key? Or
the actual ^H character?
Sorry, that ^H notation is an old Unix convention for
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-14 07:24:43 +0200]:
* Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 21:11:57 -0700]:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:12:48PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
What exactly are you referring to when you say ^H? The backspace key? Or
the actual ^H
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-30 16:55:07 -0300]:
I have the following lines in my muttrc
folder-hook =exiros|=OUT.exiros my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does
folder-hook =(exiros|OUT.exiros) ...
or
folder-hook exiros|OUT.exiros ...
work?
I could imagine that the second = is
* Shannon Prickett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-28 01:46:56 -0700]:
I'm using the isync package from Debian [0.7-1] and mutt from Debian
[1.3.28-2] and attempting to use the folder-hooks from
http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/isync/ without success.
Here are some examples that don't work for me:
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
