On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:30:46AM -0400, adam morley wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:03:50PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
[snipped]
Honestly, I'm not looking for a 100% spam-free environment because
that's next to impossible without blocking other legit mail.
seriously look into
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 04:13:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
I read from the RedHat Sendmail HOWTO that the forward and reverse DNS
should match. This became necessary due to the proliferation of spam
mails on the Net.
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:40:12AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
I wrote:
Outblaze is a third party email outsourcer.
By third party email outsourcer, do you mean it acts as a relay for
selected clients such as
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:24:24AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
You are correct as per the SMTP protocol and the relevant RFCs.
However it's my understanding from a very recent thread on the
FreeBSD-questions list, that the SMTP
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I take that by mismatches you mean an almost correct match on the RDNS.
In this day-and-age, 'almost' _is not_ good enough. The suckers _had_
better resolve. The implications of this whole thread for some Mutt users
Heck no. Have you ever
Hi,
Since April 27, I noticed that ALL my mails pass through outblaze.com, a
Hong Kong based company that I suspect, with extreme prejudice, allows
relaying of spam or could be directly involved with sending of spam
msgs.
I found out about this go-between because I've spent weeks trying to
Thanks for clarifying a lot of things.
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 02:35:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
Since April 27, I noticed that ALL my mails pass through outblaze.com, a
Hong Kong based company that I suspect, with
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:40:12AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
Aren't legit mail supposed to have matching forward and reverse DNS to
avoid having it thought of (or classified) as spam mail?
Definitely not.
You are
