Re: [OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

2001-09-14 Thread David T-G
Justin -- ...and then Justin R. Miller said... ... % Mutt problem, but I'd like to learn what the deal is either way and this % list has the kind of people who tend to know this stuff :- *grin* % % I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results Good for you! % in

[OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

2001-09-12 Thread Justin R. Miller
I've looked around a bit on several mailing list archives, but I can't seem to figure out what's causing this specific problem, though I think I've narrowed it down. Any help would be appreciated. I doubt it's a Mutt problem, but I'd like to learn what the deal is either way and this list has

Re: [OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

2001-09-12 Thread Christoph Maurer
Am Mit, 12 Sep 2001, schrieb Justin R. Miller: I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the signature. Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I take it means that the MUA is