Hi,
* Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:04:39AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
At home, I'm using Cygwin's mutt package and it just happens to have
+BUFFY_SIZE configured.
Just a comment. I compiled 1.5.18 out of the box on Cygwin and I do not
have
that set. I am not
Hi,
* Cameron Simpson wrote:
No need. For unvisited mboxen the behaviour is already ok. It is that
mutt's sync of the folder on exit sets mtime==atime that causes the
trouble. For some people that's what they want (I've visited it so
don't bug me until something _extra_ arrives) but for the
Hi,
* Wu, Yue wrote:
Thank you, 'check_mbox_size' does the trick.
Hmm, how is the partition with the mboxes mounted? This option only
exists for setups where access/modification time cannot be reliably used
to detect new mail. Filesystems can be mounted to not update atime as
that causes disk
Hi,
* Wu, Yue wrote:
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the mbox's N
mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails in it or not, not
what I think preference for me. Can I configure it? I have set the mark_old=no
Hmm, is this by any chance the same
On 2009-05-12, Rocco Rutte pd...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
* Wu, Yue wrote:
Thank you, 'check_mbox_size' does the trick.
Hmm, how is the partition with the mboxes mounted? This option only
exists for setups where access/modification time cannot be reliably used
to detect new mail.
Hi,
* Wu, Yue wrote:
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the mbox's N
mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails in it or not, not
what I think preference for me. Can I configure it? I have set the mark_old=no
Sorry for the noise. This is just for
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:40:52AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Hi,
* Wu, Yue wrote:
Thank you, 'check_mbox_size' does the trick.
Hmm, how is the partition with the mboxes mounted? This option only
exists for setups where access/modification time cannot be reliably used
to detect new
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:04:39AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2009-05-12, Rocco Rutte pd...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
* Wu, Yue wrote:
Thank you, 'check_mbox_size' does the trick.
Hmm, how is the partition with the mboxes mounted? This option only
exists for setups where
On 2009-05-13, Brian Salter-Duke b_d...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:04:39AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
At home, I'm using Cygwin's mutt package and it just happens to
have +BUFFY_SIZE configured.
Just a comment. I compiled 1.5.18 out of the box on Cygwin and
I do
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:37:16PM +0800, Wu, Yue wrote:
From: Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: How to let mutt always mark mbox as new if it contains new
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
Say, I have many mailboxes that have many new
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-11-09 01:38]:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
I feel mutt's logic is 100% correct.. telling me there are _new_ posts
on top of stuff I intially couldn't be bothered to delete and not take
into account whatever garbage I didn't
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:03:39AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-11-09 01:38]:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
I feel mutt's logic is 100% correct.. telling me there are _new_ posts
on top of stuff I intially couldn't be
Hi,
* Derek Martin wrote:
This is exactly what the OP was complaining about, and I completely
agree with him. It's highly inconvenient, if you have a lot of mbox
folders with unread e-mail in them, to go back and figure out which
ones you care about. NO OTHER MAILER HAS THIS PROBLEM, as
On 2009-05-11, Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I
routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular
posters I know are past redemption..
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 04:48:20PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Strange. I cannot reproduce this with $check_mbox_size unset, i.e. use
atime vs. mtime to detect new mail. And since I cannot reproduce it, I
cannot fix it. Attached is a patch that's supposed to reset times in
case an mbox folder
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:49:16AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2009-05-11, Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com wrote:
Say, I have many mailboxes that have many new messages, but now I have no
so
much time to see all of them, so I quickly enter mailboxes one by one,
then
just pick the message
On 11May2009 08:25, Derek Martin inva...@pizzashack.org wrote:
| On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:03:39AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
| The individual messages are still flagged as net but the mbox
| container files is not. You have lost nothing except a notice that
| the container is not new.
|
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I
routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular
posters I know are past redemption..
I don't see why I should go to the trouble of
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:13:54AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
I totally disagree.
I think mutt's logic makes excellent sense .. Especially in this list, I
routinely get mail that I couldn't care less about .. from regular
posters I know are past redemption..
I don't see why I should go
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the mbox's N
mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails in it or not, not
what I think preference for me. Can I configure it? I have set the mark_old=no
--
Hi,
Wu, Yue
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 10:19]:
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the
mbox's N mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails
in it or not, not what I think preference for me. Can I configure it?
I have set the mark_old=no
Then you
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 10:19]:
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the
mbox's N mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails
in it or not, not what I think preference
* Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com [05-08-09 12:21]:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 11:20]:
No, just new emails remain the new mark, but the mbox that contains
them not.
Ah, then you must correct those that have already been marked O.
t~O;N
return
My bad, sb: T~0;N
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 18:26]:
Do you me I should fix it manually?
:^), yes
From the manpage of muttrc, it says mark_old is for:
Controls whether or not mutt marks new unread messages as old if you
exit a mailbox without reading them.
So it's for message, not for
On 2009-05-08, Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 18:26]:
Do you me I should fix it manually?
:^), yes
From the manpage of muttrc, it says mark_old is for:
Controls whether or not mutt marks new unread messages as old if you
* Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com [05-08-09 19:57]:
I don't think this is Wu Yue's problem, Patrick. I could be wrong,
but as I understand him, he is opening a mailbox, leaving some of
the messages unread, then changing to another mailbox, then checking
to see which mailboxes contain new
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 07:37:45PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 18:26]:
From the manpage of muttrc, it says mark_old is for:
Controls whether or not mutt marks new unread messages as old if you
exit a mailbox without reading them.
So it's
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:53:50PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
I don't think this is Wu Yue's problem, Patrick. I could be wrong,
but as I understand him, he is opening a mailbox, leaving some of
the messages unread, then changing to another mailbox, then checking
to see which mailboxes
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 20:26]:
It more likely is that he expects a folder with new mail to have the
N flag for the folder which contains new mail but not newer than his
last access to that folder.
No, I expect the N flag always there, no matter the access time, if
has
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:17:37PM +0800, Wu, Yue wrote:
No, just new emails remain the new mark, but the mbox that contains them not.
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I could be totally off the mark here, but I believe the problem is
mutt's interpretation of
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:15:47PM EDT, John J. Foster wrote:
I could be totally off the mark here, but I believe the problem is
mutt's interpretation of new mail vs. your (and my) interpretation of
new mail (unread mail). I have always believed, and still do, that
unread mail is the same as
31 matches
Mail list logo
