On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
995153880.17759_1.teich
995153880.17760_1.teich
995153880.17761_1.teich
Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs.
If procmail correctly followed the specification for maildirs,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs.
If procmail correctly followed the specification for maildirs,
duplicates would be impossible.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs.
If procmail correctly followed the
So sprach »Tim Legant« am 2001-07-15 um 14:03:36 -0500 :
Okay, so you're writing messages. A unique name has three pieces,
separated by dots. On the left is the result of time(). On the right is
the result of gethostname(). In the middle is something that doesn't
repeat within one
So sprach »Magnus Bodin« am 2001-07-15 um 21:38:49 +0200 :
I agree however, that the procmail filenames are ugly.
How do real maildir filenames look like? In reality, that is - we all
heard the spec :)
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
Note the requirement to use the hostname. Note that procmail doesn't.
Procmail is broken.
Does on mine:
_vz.z77T7.titanium
[breser@titanium new]$ hostname
titanium
[breser@titanium new]$ procmail -v
procmail v3.14 1999/11/22,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:42:03AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »Walt Mankowski« am 2001-07-13 um 19:04:43 -0400 :
Maildirs have some neat advantages of their own. For example it's
very easy to merge two folders together. I send mail from my laptop,
Hmm, dunno, but I find a
