Hello guys,
When bouncing a message received from someone to someone else, is it
supposed to change the From: header to my email id?
I thought bouncing didn't change the headers or contents of the email.
But in my case, the From field shows my email id, but the name of the
sender remains
On 29Oct2011 21:45, gt codere...@gmail.com wrote:
| When bouncing a message received from someone to someone else, is it
| supposed to change the From: header to my email id?
|
| I thought bouncing didn't change the headers or contents of the email.
| But in my case, the From field shows my email
* gt codere...@gmail.com, 2011-10-29 21:45:24 Sat:
When bouncing a message received from someone to someone else, is it
supposed to change the From: header to my email id?
No, only the envelope From, as Cameron mentioned, but if you're
sending through Gmail's servers, I wouldn't be surprised
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 07:24:33PM -0400, David Haguenauer wrote:
[...]
No, only the envelope From, as Cameron mentioned, but if you're
sending through Gmail's servers, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
they rewrite From: to use either that account or an alternate address
that you've
* Leo Vegoda l...@bind.org, 2011-10-29 16:34:06 Sat:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 07:24:33PM -0400, David Haguenauer wrote:
if you're sending through Gmail's servers, I wouldn't be surprised
to learn that they rewrite From:
Gmail sets the bouncer's address as Sender but does not change the
From:
* David Haguenauer m...@kurokatta.org [10-29-11 19:48]:
* Leo Vegoda l...@bind.org, 2011-10-29 16:34:06 Sat:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 07:24:33PM -0400, David Haguenauer wrote:
if you're sending through Gmail's servers, I wouldn't be surprised
to learn that they rewrite From:
Gmail sets
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:15:18AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Do you mean From or From: ? The former is part of the message
envelope, not the message. Bounce should leave From: alone.
Can you show use the headers before and after the bounce?
I have attached the headers of the original
Nope, this is just by me pressing b to bounce the message. The only thing I
can think of is that it is being displayed inline via antiword. If that is
the case, is it either one or the other then? i.e. Being able to bounce
attachments properly and not have them displayed inline, or not being
On Mon 26-Nov-2001 at 10:59:21AM -0800, Collin Peters wrote:
Nope, this is just by me pressing b to bounce the message. The only
thing I can think of is that it is being displayed inline via
antiword.
No, (b)ouncing a message resends a message in its entirety with just
the addition of a
Collin --
...and then Collin Peters said...
% If I bounce a message that has (For example) a .doc attachment, the
% receipient gets all the headers and .doc is inline with the message and
...
Not to be too picky, but are you using 'f'orward instead of 'b'ounce to
send along the message?
If I bounce a message that has (For example) a .doc attachment, the
receipient gets all the headers and .doc is inline with the message and
totally garbled. What are the correct muttrc parameters for this. Ones I
have that may apply are:
set mime_forward_rest = yes
set
Previously, Collin Peters wrote:
% If I bounce a message that has (For example) a .doc attachment, the
% receipient gets all the headers and .doc is inline with the message and
% totally garbled. What are the correct muttrc parameters for this. Ones I
% have that may apply are:
%
% set
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 03:46:16PM -0800, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
I do not believe any parameters apply. If you bounce a message, the
entire thing gets sent - you cannot have only pieces of it go. If the
recipient cannot understand MIME email, that's another problem all
together.
If you
. Bouncing a message
from my inbox is OK though.
Is it remotely possible that your mail system looks at the "Date"
header of messages and makes problems when that one is too far in
the past?
I suppose that's possible but it seems unlikely, I'll try manually
fudging a messa
with a "Message timed out" error.
Just in case it was really a time out due to the number of messages
and the slowness of the IMAP4 server I tried bouncing a single message
but that failed with "Message timed out" too. A message sent directly
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the same copy of
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-12-02 15:20:54 +, Chris Green wrote:
I've found out that the same occurs when bouncing messages from
other non-inbox folders on my local drive. Bouncing a message
from my inbox is OK though.
Is it remotely
16 matches
Mail list logo
