Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-08 Thread Chris Fuchs
on Wed,08 Aug 2001, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: To get these to work I had replace ~/.mutt etc with a full path to the file. ~ does not seem to work in mutt macros for me. Does mutt use 'sh' when executing macros? It does for me even though I have set the mutt 'shell' variable to bash in my

Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-08 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:00:40AM -0700, Chris Fuchs wrote: on Wed,08 Aug 2001, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: To get these to work I had replace ~/.mutt etc with a full path to the file. ~ does not seem to work in mutt macros for me. Does mutt use 'sh' when executing macros? It does for me

Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-07 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:28:57PM -0500, David Champion wrote: On 2001.08.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All that would be necessary is a maillist_file setting in my .muttrc just like alias_file, and add a command to add addresses to it. Although

Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-07 Thread David Champion
On 2001.08.07, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: macro index \Co pipe-messageaddlist ~/.mutt/listsenter Scan a message for mailing lists to add macro pager \Co pipe-messageaddlist ~/.mutt/listsenter Scan a message for mailing lists to add To get

mailing list improvement

2001-08-06 Thread Mike Erickson
Hello, One of the (very) few things that has bugged me about mutt is the way it handles mailing lists. I join/leave too many mailing lists to maintain my .muttrc as well as I should. A couple days ago, the thought occured to me that mailing lists (subscribe, list) should be in a seperate file.

Re: mailing list improvement

2001-08-06 Thread David Champion
On 2001.08.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All that would be necessary is a maillist_file setting in my .muttrc just like alias_file, and add a command to add addresses to it. Although it'd be a nice bonus, it's not even necessary to autoparse the