test

2001-03-18 Thread Dave Murray
I keep getting bounced off of lists, just checking

PGP old/new headers?

2001-03-18 Thread Dave Murray
Since I switched from PGP to GPG mutt works as advertised with GPG/PGP except, I only can use new headers (MIME multi- part), which my friends in the land of Windoz can not deal with. I can't get it to send old inline for them. I tried "set pgp_create_traditional = ask-no" but responding yes to

Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? regards, Stefan

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread phaust
Hi. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? Yes, of course. Tag all messages (T .*), and then remove N flag from all of them (W N). Here's macro

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread David Champion
On 2001.03.18, in 20010318211124.A574@madmachine, "phaust" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ?

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread phaust
Hi. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:11:24PM +0100, phaust wrote: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Oops, it's not what-i've-meant : Better try this: macro index .c "T.*\n;WN" "Cath up" Best regards, -- +[: phaust (at) users.sourceforge.net :]+---+[: http://www.phaust.z.pl/ :]+ +[: the slPIM project

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread Juergen Salk
* Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010318 20:35]: is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? Try adding a macro like that in your $HOME/.muttrc: macro index \ec "T.*\n;WN;WO^T.*\n" "catch up" This should clear

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread Stefan Schwandter
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:13:12PM -0600, David Champion wrote: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster than "." or ".*". The latter performs a regular expression match against all messages, while the former just selects

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread Stefan Schwandter
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:16:22PM +0100, phaust wrote: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Oops, it's not what-i've-meant : Better try this: macro index .c "T.*\n;WN" "Cath up" I figured it out, thanks :-) regards, Stefan

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? T.enter;^R That is: T.enter Tag all messages matching '.' (means all of them) ;^R Mark

Mutt keymapping problem in KDE2.1 Konsole 1.0.1

2001-03-18 Thread John P. Verel
I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1. It's default keyboard mapping has apparently changed with the upgrade, now defaulting to "xterm (XFree 4.x.x)" This mapping does not work correctly in Mutt. Specifically, the backspace, home and end key do not work. (They

Re: Mutt keymapping problem in KDE2.1 Konsole 1.0.1

2001-03-18 Thread tmwhitehead
Whouldn't the problem lie with how your editor handles the various terminals? tw Le jour Sun Mar 18, 2001 at 05:49:30PM +, John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) a ecrit... I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1. It's default keyboard mapping has apparently

Re: Mutt keymapping problem in KDE2.1 Konsole 1.0.1

2001-03-18 Thread John P. Verel
On 03/18/01, 06:11:30PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whouldn't the problem lie with how your editor handles the various terminals? tw I wouldn't' think so. Konsole under KDE 2.0 worked just fine with default settings. As noted, mutt works fine with other terminals and with what would

Re: Mark all messages in folder read

2001-03-18 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 16:13:12 -0600, David Champion wrote: Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster than "." No, it is not. There are equal fast because of a little hack in the code (in the function mutt_check_simple in pattern.c) which checks for "." and

Re: exim and maildir/header sorting

2001-03-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Tom von Schwerdtner proclaimed on mutt-users that: 1) Is there anyway to sort the headers so they display in a certain order in mutt? If not, can you suggest a way to do this (using exim maybe, or procmail)? # Specify the order of the headers to appear when displaying a message #