lient must be restarted?
/
/ dan
No restart necessary.
Just issue:
:source aliasfile
where aliasfile is the full path to your aliasfile.
--
Rado S. eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-
Message is based on my
body.
--
Rado S. eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-
Message is based on my knowledge: | So much to do, and only so little
I'm not omniscient, take care! | time, no mercy, no hope.
On Tue 1.May'01 at 19:20:47 +0200 wrote
Rado S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have some messages with www/ftp URLs. To highlight them I use
-- QUOTE BEGIN --
color body black yellow '(ftp|www)(\.[^ ]+)+(/[^]*)*'
color body black white [^\t ]+:([^\t ]*/[^\t ]*)+
color
isn't the URL at the bottom not green but white ???
When I comment out the white definition and restart mutt, the URL turns
green !!!
I'm using Mutt 1.2.5
--
Rado S. eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-
Message
time for fcc-saves ?
Is it useful the way it is now ?
If there is a use for the current behavior, perhaps a new switch ?
(postponed_time=create|send)
--
Rado S. eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-
Message
might know most of them but for new users it would
be of great help till we get efficient with these patterns.
You should roam around the wiki in general then, too.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're
=- schoenfeld / in-medias-res wrote on Thu 11.Oct'07 at 17:43:27 +0200 -=
Some of them set the I want to receive a return receipt-option
which means that I (as the receipient) am asked if I want to send
a return receipt.
Simply send a regular reply: Seen and will do it.
--
© Rado S. -- You
a specific
template as the reply to a customer?
Yes.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Fri 12.Oct'07 at 20:22:41 +0200 -=
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:04:22PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
Why not?
What is it different from what you're looking for?
a lot of extra effort is the difference. You cannot really compare
sending a return receipt with sending
/can be accomplished elsewhere.
(not counting recent exceptions ;)
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
and not as comfortable as it could.
So it is possible, but it is everything but a configurable option.
So are many other things.
It's just one of many other mutt must have.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you
don't agree with the hardcode support for
what is possible with current means.
That, and maybe I'm just in the mood for philosophical argument
these days.
Ditto.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible
unknown goals of mutt.
Besides, DSN comes before MDN: you can't respond to which hasn't
arrived on the server.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
into your mailer isn't better.
Definitely I'm happy with mutt as it is, but as much as you and
others would like to add _more_ to it, I'd like to _strip_ it off
some parts not belonging there (by my taste, like smtp or spam).
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
it qualifies to produce
such a decision.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
is it in mine, was just giving an example why it can be
reasonable/ necessary to think more about consequences of what you
release on the world ahead of time.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL
to being bad.
Heh, you're you looking only at the immediate effects.
But there is more to it. There can be cases when too much good slips
in until it begins to produce bad results by the total effect, not
by the sum of the individuals.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
use your own script for $sendmail and manage failover
cases as you like with the means which your actual MTAs allow you to
recognize errors.
Or use a local MTA/MSA that is configured to do all that for you
already.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts
, because I can't see a single valid argument for
double effort for a less reliable solution brought in this
thread. :(
I don't see why a soft-coded solution is less reliable, lesser than
any of the other soft-coded (external) solutions.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
works well enough.
Not all that is popular in numbers in business means good in general
to make it convenient to use with mutt, see TOFU (which is range in
the same level as return-receipt for me: exceptionally necessary,
but not generally desired, same with HTML).
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide
to have admins who prepared
everything well enough.
This then leads to: what is basic, what is advanced?
What should work out of the box and what will/ should always require
tweaking?
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude
add this SMTP or return-receipt and not all the other little
goodies? Convenience applies for all equally.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
no benefit for _you_! :)
Anyway, you don't need to use bloated MTAs, you can use
http://WIKI.mutt.org/?LightSMTPagents
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
direction.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
.
But for this specific case, no code patch is even required, it works
with the current code.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
software).
The same can happen with hardcode: it sucks when you have no ssl,
curses or other libs installed. Want that all built-in?
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you
as if you were
blind to anything that is not *your* opinion.
No, I'm not blind, I'm just giving you opposition where you didn't
expect it, because your view is limited.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're
than any of the other soft-coded (external) solutions.
It's less robust. It's less well-tested. It's less
well-maintained.
Your answers base on what???
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL
is a valid result.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
has returned to mutt. When you press enter again, why should it be
any different from your first execution? Use q or x to see the
difference.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get
not in this case with
mailboxes, but when you it in hooks it might mismatch.
Just don't get used to extra /.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
function can leave traces behind that it was invoked to
distinguish it from single-user replies.
But currently the answer is no.
Though it would certainly be nice to have. ;)
OP: Submit a patch or at least a wish item on the bugs.mutt.org page.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your
.
Have a look at the wiki, too.
Especially the MuttGuide / Folders section, also the faq.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
++
I tried it without the ' ' quotes:
folder-hook . set record=^
which also seems to work. Is there a reason those additional
quotes should be included?
For quoting see DebugConfig and MuttGuide / Syntax and
PatternQuoting on wiki.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal
=- Chris G wrote on Thu 6.Dec'07 at 13:03:13 + -=
What's a reliable way of removing empty maildirs?
Presumably it's possible but you'd have to follow some protocol that
wouldn't interfere with the proper writing of messages to the maildir.
chmod a-w dir/new
rm -rf dir
--
© Rado S
the external address only for outgoing
emails and the internal one for local mail?
Yes, read about the various hooks in manual.txt.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
to set a flag on a folder that I am aware.
Right, mutt can't do that.
But you could change it manually via your shell by resetting mtime and
atime as needed.
Jörg, see also faq (IIRC).
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude
probably have some user-defined ~h or ~b checks/ hooks for
index view.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
write?
No. Yes.
Re-read how various hooks work (not all are the same).
See DebugConfig on wiki for pitfalls.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
for this.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- Eric Smith wrote on Thu 17.Jan'08 at 11:07:13 +0100 -=
{ compose menu }
How do I prevent the Reply-To: from appearing?
You can't, but no worries. No such header will be produced and added
to your outgoing msg as long as it is empty.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your
. is there a way to make all this
happen on the remote IMAP store?
Have a look at guide (folders, imap) + faq at wiki as suggested to
you in your welcome message.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL
there is a better way to do it without
using external programs...
You can put the content of the script in your mailcap, but that's
ugly. That's not a mutt, but a mime/mailcap problem, so you're
already using external programs, one more doesn't hurt you.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your
.
copy: no
define a
macro compose
change-field-in-compose-menukill-linevalue-for-fieldenter
For details about content see '?' help of compose menu.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you
attachments, then hit '?' again to find the keys for 2 ways of
displaying the msg: raw + rendered.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
misunderstood.
+ means pass cmd
/ search for regex
What you want is to search for 1st '^' quote-char, then thereafter
1st non-quote-char '^[^]'.
I leave the exact solution as vim-excercise, or else ask in #vim (on
the IRC-network or mailing-list near you) for more.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide
key-press would start firefox
url.
Perhaps with lynx, but I'm still searching for a method to start
firefox from lynx.
That's documented with lynx, see external applications or
similar. You must configure it before using.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort
or
reduce this delay?
Yes, depending on your context.
See http://WIKI.mutt.org/?BeforeYouAsk
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
it match ML-identification in To: ?
See also http://WIKI.mutt.org/?DebugConfig
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- Bill Moseley wrote on Wed 5.Mar'08 at 12:00:52 -0800 -=
I suspect there's an much easier way to deal with HTML-only email
(other than /dev/null).
The wiki-faq tells you, listed in the welcome-to-this-list message.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort
for
an entry?
See '?' help when you enter 'query' mode.
See also manual.txt about bindings.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- Ken Weingold wrote on Tue 18.Mar'08 at 9:33:45 -0400 -=
{ alternative_order exceptions }
You can use message-hook or macro to reset alternative_order as
needed, or a macro or display_filter to pipe the message to
prepare before display.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort
code only with some macro hacks.
A code patch might be more convenient, but would require policy
decisions and compatibility considerations with IMAP.
I tried to add the group-replied flag 'g', but it wasn't trivial
to make it work with IMAP.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your
.
Why not?
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
FOLDER=...
ADDR=...
INCLUDERC=...
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
I tell mutt to automatically open a certain folder
when calling it?
Fix both at once, read the Welcome mail, follow the Guide to
/Folders.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get
to resend it to you.
Anyway, go to the wiki - Guide - /Folders.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
not working for me,
though. Here's the hook:
message-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'alternative_order text/html'
Any ideas what my problem is?
Yes, see DebugConfig on wiki and also re-read the introduction to
hooks.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts
works, but you'd need to capture the raw
ESC-sequence produced by it, there is no mutt-code for it.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
to populate the list
of folders from.
RTFM all the imap_... variables, there is one doing what you want,
when you subscribe to the IMAP folders.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what
-mail?
view attachments, - '?'
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
much!
I use folder-hook to re-/set autoview: multipart/...
and have in ~/.mailcap:
-- QUOTE BEGIN --
multipart/alternative;cat;copiousoutput
multipart/mixed;cat;copiousoutput
--- QUOTE END ---
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts
=- Kyle Wheeler wrote on Fri 25.Apr'08 at 11:25:56 -0500 -=
On Friday, April 25 at 06:03 PM, quoth Rado S:
I use folder-hook to re-/set autoview: multipart/...
and have in ~/.mailcap:
-- QUOTE BEGIN --
multipart/alternative;cat;copiousoutput
multipart/mixed;cat;copiousoutput
=- Wilkinson, Alex wrote on Tue 29.Apr'08 at 9:01:45 +0800 -=
Is it possible to stop threads un-collaping as new mail arrives ?
Yes, check vars with collapse in them.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're
available (errno = 37)
Couldn't lock /myhomedirpath/sent
Permission problems, use maildir instead, don't use sent folder,
fool mutt to believe locking works, put sent onto non-nfs, ...
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude
. uncollapse_jump
3.45. digest_collapse
And none of these control what the desired behaviour.
Can you enlighten me with what you where thinking ?
I presumed the 1st one.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're
have to edit this files all the time I want to change
something...
Using symlinks and abusing $folder should ease things.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
know of stale NFS handles freezing mutt beyond recovery.
Try with local filesys folder open in mutt all day. If it doesn't
hang, it's NFS.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get
this to e.g. the section How to make mutt
check for new mail more often? in
http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Folder if this is considered useful.
Sure, go ahead.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do
=score.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
the wiki said: it is already covered
by tag-prefix.
What you actually produced is tag-prefixtag-prefix
= back to solo mode.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 16:59:22 +0200 -=
On May 31 15:32, Rado S wrote:
=- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 14:51:57 +0200 -=
I should have been more specific. Yes, that works if and only if
one or more messages are tagged. However, as I understand [1], the
above
=- Awflasher(GuoQirui) wrote on Sun 1.Jun'08 at 16:58:36 +0800 -=
Mutt is really great but I cannot get anything when sending a 6M file.
That's not a mutt problem, check your sendmail config and your ISP
limitations.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort
.
For general debugging advice see also the welcome message with links
to the wiki.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
with this. ;)
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
imap_..._subscribed.
Also see the wiki for help with imap: guide - Imap.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
.
Something like imap_..._subscribed.
Also see the wiki for help with imap: guide - Imap.
Really? That will display folders from multiple servers in the
same list?
Really. :)
It does so for me since I started using IMAP with mailboxes and
imap_check(?)_subscribed.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide
,
interleaving folders from different servers, despite sorting by size
or date.
Suggestions, improvements, comments, are welcome, of course. :-)
Repeating myself ad nauseum(?) (in general, not to you in
particular ;): RTFW(iki).
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
':...', drop 1 level of evaluation.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
for sending a new email start which isn't what
I expected or wanted to happen.
Probably a quoting levels problem, related to the unnecessary use of
push.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you
a warning or to even refuse to attach xml files?
= wiki - ConfigTricks
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
- $sendmail - sendmail
and adds a check
mutt - $sendmail - own-script-for-check - sendmail
Now, where comes smtp_url into play here?
I guess right before $sendmail, so ...
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're
be different, so I recommend going through all the vars to
doublecheck them for windows validity.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
what you want before passing the content to the real
sendmail-binary. Take care of locking, since mutt doesn't care for
what sendmail does to folders.
Location: 41:24:51N (41.41417) 2:11:25E (2.1903)
You might want to add yourself to
http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttMaps
--
© Rado S. -- You
).*
but work with * ? fgrep -f file.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
, but it's a
feature rather than a bug.
If it's up to mutt, a filed wish might produce an optional behaviour.
Otherwise hack your server to do as you like or make a new IMAP
standard. ;)
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude
?
Yes, rmdir ~/.mutt*
Scan mutt-dev archive for this topic to understand origin, problems
and workarounds.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
to find a specific thread.
For me it was related to NFS, and it was about tmpdir/tmpfile
generation. Lookout for posts by me, I suggested a patch to revert
the newly introduced behaviour.
After recent discussions I'm almost afraid to ask... :/
*grins*
No worries, just keep improving.
--
© Rado S
strict_threads, then ^D.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
reply-to. Don't become a spammer yourself when you can avoid it, and
you can with mutt-ot.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- Kabel wrote on Thu 2.Oct'08 at 23:05:10 +0200 -=
Does somebody could show me his .muttrc where he's accessing more
than one mail server?
wiki - ConfigList,
but see also MuttGuide / UseIMAP and MuttGuide - UserStories.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
, my friend!\n\n'
P.S. Is there reasons why so useful and trivial patch wasn't added yet
(and won't be added in the future)? I use it for many years.
Because no patch is needed to achieve the same.
rtfm attribution + signature.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
to setup complete email
template for each possible case. And MUA is all about usability,
so this is important thing!
Usability is subjective. For some functionality means even more.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude
.
Which still could be produced _automatically_ by the same script or
an extra wrapper.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed 15.Oct'08 at 7:18:33 -0700 -=
2. I added a send-hook as per a tutorial on the web and tips on
the irc channel. It only works the *2nd* time you try to send a
message.
send-hook vs. send2-hook.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal
/
for it. Attach yourself as Cc: for updates and wait for it to be
corrected or supply a patch yourself.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo