On 2000-06-03 23:42:17 -0700, Anton Graham wrote:
I would guess that your problem stems, in part, from
the fact that the mbox format is not really designed
for a 47 meg box with 7500+ messages.
Personally, I have mbox folders with several 1e5 messages,
and have not experienced any problems
On 2000-06-04 20:44:26 +1000, CaT wrote:
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
hmmm...
Well if you check my X-Mailer header now... :)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
Before attempt:
-%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
After attempt:
---Mutt: /var/spool/mail/damien.work [Msgs:5038 New:9 Old:1074 Post:1 34M]--
What precisely did happen between these two versions of
the
On 2000-06-06 22:14:20 +0300, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
my problem is NOT "how to show/hide specific headers",
but rather "how to retain the original From_ line". for
instance: when the message arrives to the mail server
(sendmail 8.10.1 and mail.local from solaris 7), the
From_ line in the
On 2000-06-08 09:54:49 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html
%s;nametemplate=%s.html
lynx really is in /usr/bin/lnyx, so what's missing?
The copiousoutput entry.
Try this instead:
text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal ;
On 2000-06-08 16:00:11 +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.15i
How do I resend a msg from my outbox?
Upgrade. :-)
Sometimes msgs get lost and I'd like to send a duplicate.
Is there a simple way of doing this?
With your version of mutt, about all you can do is to
bounce the
On 2000-06-08 18:11:42 -0500, Andrew Eichmann wrote:
my_hdr Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather do this:
set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
set envelope_from
set hostname="enteract.com"
I used to run pine, and didn't have this problem after
I forced the header to say [EMAIL
On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
get this to happen again.
I think we have already been reproducing what you
describe, and there are
On 2000-06-11 16:45:56 +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
What does this macro and script achieve that slrn can
not do already. I can already reply and forward from
inside slrn. Am I missing something important?
My reason for writing (and using) it is that I prefer to
have the same set of
On 2000-06-13 15:44:47 -0400, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
Maybe I have a case of the stupids here, but I used the
gpgrc file that comes with the source distro and when I
sign a mail with my GPG signature the entire message
gets converted to SMIME format.
S/MIME is something mutt doesn't
On 2000-06-14 03:20:03 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
It's a pretty simple thing, attached is the perl script
randline.pl that I wrote for my own use. It prints out
a random line from the file given as argument.
set signature="fortune -s|"
--
Barometer, n.:
An ingenious instrument
On 2000-06-14 09:59:43 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Valid Author Specification Present
Error sending message, child exited 9 ().
I'm running Mutt on a sco openserver 5.0.5 box, using
MMDF for mail transport. Any ideas on what may stop
this problem would be helpful, mutt runs fine on
On 2000-06-15 15:36:17 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
Whoever wrote the file in question will have been using
my mutt mode for jed. In case you didn't realise it jed
can use the same mode identifier that emacs uses (as
above).
I was the one to add these comments in the beginning of
quite a few
On 2000-06-15 21:08:02 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
The Jargon File also mentions " " as the standard inclusion leader.
Doesn't RFC 1036 have something on this?
Anyway, regardless of being RFC-documented or not, ""
_is_ the most widely accepted standard for tagging quoted
messages when
On 2000-06-19 22:20:11 -0400, Chris Conrad wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why things broke with the
upgrade ?
Did you update your configuration files? The pgp
interface changed a lot between 1.0 and 1.2.
I'm afraid I can't reproduce this here with PGP.
On 2000-06-20 10:40:37 +0200, Antoine Martin wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:40:37 +0200
From: Antoine Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gpg/mime
Mail-Followup-To: Antoine Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 2000-06-20 12:59:13 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I
meant setgid nor setuid in other message)?
Yes.
I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only
permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has
-rw-rw permissions and is owned by
On 2000-06-20 13:08:25 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
FYI, this may help track down the problems. I think it has something
to do with mutt_dotlock or else how I compiled it. This is how I
compiled mutt... maybe I need to add more stuff (like the locking
stuff?) to configure?
./configure
I wrote a moment ago:
Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock.
In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to
that directory, which is normally enabled by making
mutt_dotlock setgid mail.
To illustrate things, here's an example from my system:
% ls -ld
Mutt-1.2.2 is on its way to the FTP archive under
ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/,
and will soon propagate to the usual mirror sites, as
listed under http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
This version fixes a build problem present with 1.2.1.
Thus, if Mutt-1.2.1 is working for you,
On 2000-06-21 11:57:40 +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
Um, when did 1.2.1 come out? I've had my eyes peeled for the
announcement for quite a while now...
Me2.
That was one or two days ago. It seems the announcement
didn't make it to mutt-announce.
On 2000-06-21 21:13:10 +1000, CaT wrote:
Bug still there.
*sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it
appeared to be from my own tests.
Just a question: Did mutt leave any temporary files behind
which could be used to reconstruct the mail folder?
On 2000-06-21 13:37:45 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
*sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it
appeared to be from my own tests.
Please try the attached patch. The error I made was
incredibly stupid.
Index: mbox.c
On 2000-06-21 10:13:03 -0400, Daniel Monjar wrote:
Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything
appeared to work well but mutt seg faults on
invocation.
Have you recently upgraded your libc?
On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
single slash, I get this:
[...]
It seems to swallow the first slash.
Please try the attached patch.
Index: muttlib.c
On 2000-06-21 14:11:05 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
-rwxr-sr-x1 root mail36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*
-rwxr-xr-x
Ok, this is a bit off-topic, but I still have to ask
somewhere. ;-)
What's the PGP version currently recommended? I don't
seem to be able to find something more recent than some
obscure beta of 6.5.1i, which is likely to still have
certain bugs I already observed in an earlier beta, and
which
On 2000-06-27 22:57:05 -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
I'm having a similar problem. I just ditched 5.0i and
installed 6.5.2. However there are no 'pkspxycwrap' or
'pgpring' command as used in the pgp6.rc sample
included with mutt's source. Which version of PGP
exactly do the developers use
On 2000-06-27 20:40:16 -0700, fman wrote:
try my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDlYQxYRBACHDSw/JNcmvvZeQQMKq954FHbiyJHyNZ+clwwdFPzIOsxiq3AW
On 2000-06-28 11:03:53 -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
Another question - if I type in an *incorrect*
passphrase, it won't let me try again - or at least I
don't know how to make it let me try again - so I have
to abort the message. Is there a way to re-enter a
passphrase enterred incorrectly?
On 2000-06-29 00:13:56 +0200, Dirk Pirschel wrote:
pirschel@tux:~/tmp/mutt-1.3.4 ./configure
[...]
checking for iconv... yes
checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
Any suggestions?
Get libiconv from http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/.
On 2000-06-29 14:46:31 +0800, Wari Wahab wrote:
color body brightyellow default" \([A-Z']{2,}[ ,]*\)+"
As a general rule, try to avoid regular expressions which
nest multiple instances of "+" and "*". They tend to take
very long to apply.
Note, BTW, that the grouping and the trailing
On 2000-06-29 19:42:26 +0800, Wari Wahab wrote:
The question still remains though, why does mutt freeze..
Simple: The regexp library hangs when trying the regular
expression. I don't believe it's an endless loop - most
likely, mutt will continue to work in an hour or two. ;-)
On 2000-06-29 19:36:24 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
Can Mutt 1.2 handle UTF-8?
Only on the receiving side.
When I have $charset="iso-8859-13", and
$send_charset="utf-8", bad things happen. BTW, I have
glibc 2.1.3.
For heavily improved utf-8 support (including the use of
UTF-8 as the
On 2000-06-30 01:10:22 -0400, Hugo Haas wrote:
It makes sense. Now I'm convinced that Mail-Followup-To
is useful. I'll still be frustrated, but I am
convinced. :-)
I found an Internet Draft about it, but it expired 2
years ago:
On 2000-06-30 13:46:22 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
I didn't know Mutt-1.3.x supported utf-8 display
without additional patches.
Most of the changes made to the unstable branch so far
were precisely about that.
I guess it still needs a utf-8 enabled slang, right?
Yes.
urlview-0.9 is out. You can download it from the
following location:
ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/contrib
This version merges in some patches floating around on the
net and in Debian GNU/Linux and SuSE Linux.
This release closes a security hole present in previous
versions which
Mutt-1.2.4 is out. This version fixes a couple of
problems present in 1.2.2, and one problem leading to
crashes whose fix was lacking from 1.2.3. We suggest that
users of earlier versions upgrade to this release of mutt.
You can download this version of mutt from the usual
place:
On 2000-07-07 11:12:59 +0200, Dirk Pirschel wrote:
bakterius{pirschel}~/tmp/mutt-1.3.4 ./configure --prefix=$HOME
[...]
checking for iconv... no
configure: error: Unable to find iconv library
libiconv is installed in my $HOME
Tell that mutt. ./configure --prefix=$HOME --with-iconv=$HOME
On 2000-07-08 18:03:49 +0100, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Mutt-1.2.4 is out. This version fixes a couple of
[...]
?! When was 1.2.3 announced - or did I manage to miss
that announcement somehow? (The web site also still
shows
ng it
upon locking. I don't believe there's anything mutt could
do about that. It has to happen in the file system
implementation.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, for instance, set a
special From address for messages directed to a specific
mailing list. Similarly, you can adjust almost arbitrary
settings, such as your .signature, various formats, and
the like.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set definition files, which happens when these
files are first needed.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mutt's mixmaster support.
Maybe you complain to the current maintainer of mixmaster
about this change, and point to mutt's interface. Adding
a "-T" option should be trivial according to Ulf Möller
who developed large parts of the 2.9 and 3.0 code base.
--
Thomas Roessler
; to "save to trash", and set $purge
to yes.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just for your information: The primary FTP and public CVS
server is unreachable for unknown reasons. The
administrator has been informed.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-07-13 16:16:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can mutt send mails using directly an ESMTP server?
I.e. using the AUTH extension (and other) of ESMTP?
No. You'll have to use a separate SMTP client for that.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The primary FTP and CVS server is back on the net. Note,
however, that it may feel a bit loaded due to the Slashdot
effect (the LinuxTag photo story).
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-07-13 10:48:03 -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
Are you referring to $delete?
Yes.
I'm not aware of a $purge option, and it's not in
the mutt reference.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
agent around. Sorry, but
this isn't our problem.
About supporting SMTP: This would be considerably more
complex than the current approach.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
opening" these text/plain
attachments produces the normal "uh-oh, opening this may
be dangerous" dialog, is just another sign for the
nonsense going on there.)
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, since it assumes
+the alias is a whole address.
Well, this is actually only partially true. You can use
aliases like this one:
alias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in order to get TAB-completion for frequently-used
addresses.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-07-18 06:38:43 -0400, David T-G wrote:
alias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your variant will only be replaced if you actually reach
the alias menu.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on the Solaris machine.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm planning to add a doc/ subdirectory to the FTP area,
which should carry translations of the mutt documentation
which aren't included with the source code.
If you are maintaining such a translation, please contact
me.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
programs than just mutt?
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for this to happen should be fixed as of
1.2.4. All these problems were related to disks running
full.
Do you happen to have insufficient free space in /tmp?
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux ; else echo default ; fi`
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quot;.
- Your terminal must support colors. Setting TERM to
xterm won't give you color support. Try xterm-color, or,
if you have a sufficiently-recent xterm and ncurses
version installed, TERM=xterm-xf86-v33.
- Finally, you should put some color definitions into your
~/.mu
-lookalikes and the like one may stumble
over, I prefer a solution which works for all settings of
$TERM.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the canonical line endings. mutt just pipes the
MIME data into pgp (or gpg, for that matter), and relies on text
mode to do line end canonicalization.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-07-24 19:00:55 -0400, Jason Helfman wrote:
i stopped it after this.
You can safely ignore these.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the beginning of a mail
address. That is, you can easily use things like these:
subscribe mutt-users
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc., and they will work as intended. However, you can't do things
like this:
subscribe @securityfocus.com
--
Thomas Roessler
On 2000-07-26 09:42:06 -0400, David T-G wrote:
One could probably do
subscribe .*@securityfocus.com
or perhaps ("the beginning of a mail address"?) even
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. The matching is done with strncmp.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should have a nice view out of the window. :-)
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w.mutt.org/download.html.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
;" field
completely when Mutt sends mail.
Well, mutt's envelope_from option permits you to make the envelope
from identical to the header from. You can't set them independently
of each other, currently.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-07-30 11:31:15 -0700, DAve wrote:
Next step, I'll try one tonight. If it fails I'm off to
sendmail.org (now where's that m4 file I built last summer?)
Using postfix may be considerably easier.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-08-07 13:38:22 +0200, Caster wrote:
In his mails the are headers like this:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--6B13520415787970"
Could you forward a complete message to this list, including all
relevant headers, and the nested MIME stuff?
Thanks.
--
Thoma
-line?
Please point The Bat!'s authors to RFC 2015. A successor's
revised Internet-Draft should go into the ID repositories these days.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about multipart/mixed with
PGP nessages, I speculated about a broken attempt to implement
PGP/MIME, but this is just a MUA being creative and attaching the
public key to messages.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
recognize this option. Is there some way I can acheive the same
functionality?
The newer versions now have a more generalized PGP setup by the way
of format strings. Just change the appropriate configuration
options - see contrib/gpg.rc for an example.
--
Thomas Roessler
are created by your editor.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-09-05 20:44:42 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
I switched from mbox to Maildir a few days ago. I always had the
feeling that Maildir is much slower - well for big Mailboxes at
least - than mbox. Now I did some testing.
This might be related to your file system's performance.
--
Thomas
.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. a 1000 messages.
I was more thinking about ext2fs performance with large directories.
With reiserfs, the overhead could only come from the larger number
of open() and close() system calls.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-09-06 19:27:57 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
Does anyone have a script that does this?
Why don't you just use mutt to do it?
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
--]
--
/Jason G Helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149
--
Thoma
On 2000-09-11 14:46:43 -0400, hal King wrote:
Hi mutt'sters!
Does anynoe have or know of a substitute for the pkspxy package. I'm on
Solaris and I'm having a heck of a time porting it.
A problem report on this would certainly be welcome.
--
Thomas Roessler
and encrypting emails
is easy from the command-line, but within mutt... well, I just
haven't figured out that yet.
I don't think macros are the way to go here. Please have a look at
mutt's pgp.c which has most of the code for _invoking_ pgp.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(or fixing your PGP setup ,-)
should help for the pager case.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subsequently deleting messages has
traditionally been called "saving" in mail user agents. The key you
are looking for is "s".
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot;lists" are
a superset of addresses in "subscribe". Or am I missing the
point?
Not at all - I mistyped things. So, to get this right: The set of
subscribed lists (subscribe) is always a subset of the set of known
lists (lists).
Sorry for the confusion.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?subject=info etc..).
mutt-1.3.9 accepts mailto URLs on the command line.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a suggestion from someone else, I am going to see if anyone
on the Mutt-Dev list can shed any light on to this ...
You still owe us your $charset variable's setting.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, you can set the
$rfc2047_parameters variable.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mx.c:639
#7 0x805746f in mutt_index_menu () at curs_main.c:977
#8 0x8066b53 in main (argc=1, argv=0xb984) at main.c:709
Adam
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is encrypted/signed, and eventually
put into some more MIME sugar. Here, PGP only ever touches us-ascii
text (with which it deals nicely); the actual character set
conversions are left to the software which interprets the inner MIME
layers.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-10-05 00:22:40 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
[suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which mutt
/usr/bin/mutt
[suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which cmutt
/usr/bin/cmutt
[suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which xmutt
/usr/bin/xmutt
What on earth are cmutt and xmutt supposed to be?
--
Thomas Roessler
mail-file.
That message is generated by Pine, uw-imapd and other software from
that source. It's used to store folder-internal data this software
believes to need.
We don't use it - to mutt, it's just a normal mail message which can
be deleted, saved, and manipulated like any other one.
--
Thoma
),
it also does not support submission as of RFC2476.
Mutt cannot ACT as a mail submission agent in the sense of RFC 2476,
but it can USE an external MSA.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ge
without having to be briefed.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cartel of India, tinlcI
Azh nazg durbataluk, azh nazg gimbatul,
Azh nazg thrakataluk agh burzum ishi krimpatul
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. I
did find a curses library in some odd place, I might try again with slang or
something like that.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a response to a question sent to
a list and I'd like a tab key or something to cycle through
which mailboxes have new mail.
Try space.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
won't have the pine meanings in any of these programs.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$*
else
echo "Please enter passphrase: "
stty -echo
read pgppassphrase
PGPPASS=$pgppassphrase; export PGPPASS
stty echo
$PATHTOMUTT/mutt $passparam
fi
--
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Daniel.
--
Thomas
you try to change the content-type of these octet-streams to
application/pgp? With the more recent mutt versions, you can
comfortably do this from within mutt.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the Sendmail
Installation and Operation Guide.
... and not supported by MTAs different from sendmail, such as
postfix or qmail, right?
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
301 - 400 of 584 matches
Mail list logo
