Hi,
Since April 27, I noticed that ALL my mails pass through outblaze.com, a
Hong Kong based company that I suspect, with extreme prejudice, allows
relaying of spam or could be directly involved with sending of spam
msgs.
I found out about this go-between because I've spent weeks trying to
* On [010511 22:45] Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2001-05-11 15:56:33 -0400, adam morley wrote:
I've just been told that is non-standard though. which means
we are distributing a software package that is non-standard. is
that bad?
Is not _what_ standard? If we don't say
I have a little problem with displaying the proper date in mutt. My
date_format is set to "%c". The problem is with the time zone which mutt
shows when I reply to a message. Let's say I reply to my own mail. I am
in the CEST time zone (yes, date shows the right time; my locale is also
set as it
Hello Mutt Users!
On sob 12 maj 2001 15:10:28 GMT Tomasz Olszewski wrote:
+0200). However I found that the From header may look bad (
like this: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 12 15:01:33 2001). There is no
+0200 in there.
Others' "Froms" look similar, so it's OK. However my problem is still
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
* On [010511 22:45] Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2001-05-11 15:56:33 -0400, adam morley wrote:
I've just been told that is non-standard though. which means
we are distributing a software package that is
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:14:05AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
adam morley proclaimed on mutt-users that:
oh the mail-followup-to header might be a little weird, considering im using
list reply and mine might not be configured the same as yours.still
learning just how it
Thanks for clarifying a lot of things.
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 02:35:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
Since April 27, I noticed that ALL my mails pass through outblaze.com, a
Hong Kong based company that I suspect, with
Using a large mallet, adam morley whacked out:
ignore *# this means ignore all lines by default
unignorefrom: subject to cc mail-followup-to \
date x-mailer x-url # this shows how nicely wrap long lines
well, i wanted to see it at message compose time, not at
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I want to forward a message including the attachment the message
contains. Will Mutt do this by default, or do I have to instruct it to do
so? If so, how? TIA
set mime_fwd=ask-yes
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Lumber Cartel India -
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:48:58AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I want to forward a message including the attachment the message
contains. Will Mutt do this by default, or do I have to instruct it to do
so? If so, how? TIA
Using a large mallet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whacked out:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:48:58AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I want to forward a message including the attachment the message
contains. Will Mutt do this by default, or
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:49:26AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, adam morley whacked out:
ignore * # this means ignore all lines by default
unignore from: subject to cc mail-followup-to \
date x-mailer x-url # this shows how nicely wrap
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:40:12AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
Aren't legit mail supposed to have matching forward and reverse DNS to
avoid having it thought of (or classified) as spam mail?
Definitely not.
You are
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:48:58AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I want to forward a message including the attachment the message
contains. Will Mutt do this by default, or do I have to instruct it to do
so? If so, how? TIA
14 matches
Mail list logo
